This study was an investigation of whether a paper and pencil measure of cognitive development level is a better predictor of success in an eighth grade algebra course than more traditional measures such as algebra prognosis and general achievement test scores, teacher recommendations, and previous mathematics grades. Multiple regression analyses using a sample of 131 students indicated that two standardized measures, one of general achievement and one of cognitive development, were the best overall predictors of success as measured by a standardized algebra achievement test. Using the final algebra grade as the criterion measure resulted in teacher recommendations and previous mathematics grades as the best predictors. The addition of gender to both equations showed a slight edge for males on achievement scores, but did not differentiate between the sexes with respect to grades received.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arlin, P. K.
(1982a). A multi-trait/multi-method validity study of a test of formal reasoning. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 1077-1088.
2.
Arlin, P. K.
(1982b). An objective test of formal reasoning, (1982 rev.). Unpublished test.
3.
Barnes, W.
, & Asher, J. (1962). Predicting students' success in first year algebra. Mathematics Teacher, 55, 651-654.
4.
Bates, M. (1978). An investigation of the relation between certain reasoning abilities and the ability to learn certain algebraic operations. (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 2110-2111A.
5.
Beard, R. M.
(1972). The growth of logical thinking. In L. R. Chapman (Ed.). The process of learning mathematics (pp. 155-182). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
6.
Benbow, C. P.
, & Stanley, J. C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: A longitudinal perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 598-622.
7.
Begle, E. G.
(1976). Predicting success in beginning algebra: A review of the empirical literature. (SMESG, Working paper No. 18). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Mathematics Education Study Group. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 121 606)
8.
Bloland, R. M.
, & Michael, W. B. (1984). A comparison of the relative validity of a measure of Piagetian cognitive development and a set of conventional prognostic measures in the prediction of the future success of the ninth-and tenth-grade students in algebra. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 925-943.
9.
Carpenter, T. P.
, Corbitt, M. K., Kepner, H. S., Jr., Lindquist, M. M., & Reyes, R. E. (1982). Student performance in algebra: Results from the national assessment. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 514-531.
10.
Cooperative Mathematics Tests, Form A, Algebra 1(1962). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
11.
Dockweiler, C. J.
(1983). 8th grade algebra after six years A study report. College Station, TX: Texas A & M University, College of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 223457).
12.
Flexer, B. K.
(1984). Predicting eighth-grade algebra achievement. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 352-360.
13.
Forman, S. L. (1980). The relations between age, certain reasoning abilities and the ability to learn selected algebraic operations: An exploratory study. (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 575-A.
14.
Hanna, G.
, Bligh, H., & Lenke, J. (1970). Student reported grades as predictors. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 48, 465-468.
15.
Hanna, G.
, Bligh, H., & Lenke, J., & Orleans, J. B. (1969). Predicting algebra achievement with an algebra prognosis test, IQs, teacher predictions, and mathematics grades. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 903-907.
16.
Higgins-Trenk, A.
, & Gaite, A. J. H. (1971). Elusiveness of formal operational thought in adolescence. Proceedings of the 79th Convention of the American Psychological Association, 6, 201-202.
17.
Inhelder, R.
, & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Lawson, A. E.
, & Wolman, W. T. (1980). Developmental level and learning to solve problems of proportionality in the classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 80, 69-75.
19.
Mogull, R. G.
, & Rosengarten, W. (1974). Predicting success in elementary algebra. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 20, 34-38.
20.
Orleans, J. B.
, & Hanna, G. S. (1982). Orleans-Hanna algebra prognosis test. New York: Harcourt-Brace Jovanovich.
21.
Pallrand, G. J.
(1979). The transition to formal thought. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16, 445-451.
22.
Pedhazur, E. J.
(1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
23.
Piaget, J.
(1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24.
Prevost, E. J.
(1985). Let's not teach algebra to eighth graders. Mathmatics Teacher, 78, 586-587.
25.
Reed, R. B. (1978). The relationship between the level of cognitive development and success in first-year algebra. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
26.
Sabers, D. L.
, & Feldt, L. S. (1968). The predictive validity of the Iowa Algebra Aptitude Test for achievement in modern mathematics and algebra. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 901-907.
27.
Shayer, M.
, & Wylam, H. (1978). The distribution of Piagetian stages of thinking in British middle and secondary school children. II: 14-16-year olds and sex differentials. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 62-70.
28.
Stevens, J.
(1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
