Comparison of Finnish and U.S.-based Visual Analog Scale Valuations of the EQ-5D Measure

Abstract

The EQ-5D is a multiattribute health status measure that can be used to derive preference-based index scores for health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) assessment. Valuations for EQ-5D health states using different techniques have been obtained in a number of countries. It is not clear how valuations from different countries compare. Using an ordinary least-squares regression, visual analog scale valuations for EQ-5D health states obtained in postal surveys in Finland and the United States were compared. The regression model estimates indicated that Finnish and U.S. respondents did provide different preference valuations for different levels of health. However, the country-specific differences were not large and depended on the dimension and the level of problem on that dimension. Differences in health-state valuations are unlikely to have important implications when using the EQ-5D in international studies. Key words: EQ-5D; valuations; health-related quality of life; visual analog scale; health status. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:281-289)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Drummond MF , O'Brien B , Stoddart G , Torrance G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997

Guideline for the Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals. 2nd ed. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Coordinating Office on Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA), 1997

Gold MR , Siegal JE , Russell LB , Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Kind P. The EuroQol instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In: Spilker B (ed). Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1996

Brooks RG , and the EuroQol Group

EuroQol the current state of play

Health Policy 1996;37:1

Essink-Bot ML , Bonsel GJ , van der Maas PJ Valuations of health states by general public: feasibility of standardized measurement procedure. Soc Sci Med. 1990;31:1201-6.

Brooks RG , Jendteg S , Lindgren B , Persson U , Bjork S.

EuroQoL. health-related quality of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise

Health Policy. 1991; 18:25-36.

Nord E

EuroQoL health-related quality of life measurement Valuations of health states by the general public in

Norway Health Policy 1991;18:37-46.

Dolan P , Gudex C , Kind P , Williams A. The time-trade off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ 1996;5:141-54.

10.

Nord E , Richardson J , Macarounas-Kirchman K. Social evaluation of health care versus personal evaluation of health states. Evidence of the validity of four health-state scaling instruments using Norwegian and Australian surveys. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993;9:463-78.

11.

Johnson JA , Ergo A , Coons SJ

Valuation of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) in adult US sample

PharmacoEconomics 1998;13:421-33.

12.

Aaronson NK , Acquadro C , Alonso J , et al. International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Quality of Life Research. 1992;1:349-51

13.

Dolan P.

Valuing health-related quality of life: issues and controversies

PharmacoEconomics . 1999;15:119-27.

14.

Ohinmaa A , Helala E , Sintonen H. Modeling EuroQol values of Finnish adult population. 12th EuroQol Plenary Meeting, Barcelona, Spain, 3-6 October 1995.

15.

Williams A Measuring and valuing health in the UK. a chronicle. Discussion Paper 136. York, U.K. Centre for Health Economics, The University of York, 1995

16.

Dolan P

Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states

Med Care 1997,35:1095-108

17.

Gujarati DN Basic Econometrics. Singapore, Malaysia: McGraw-Hill, 1995.

18.

Feeny D , Furlong W , Boyle M , et al. Multi-attribute health status classification systems PharmacoEconomics . 1995,7: 490-502.

19.

Kaplan RM , Anderson JP. The general health policy model: an integrated approach. In: Spilker B (ed). Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven , 1996.

20.

Herdman M , Fox-Rushby J , Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQOL instruments. the universalist approach. Quality of Life Research 1998,7 323-35

21.

Herdman M , Fox-Rushby J , Badia X.

Equivalence and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires

Quality of Life Research. 1997,6:237-47.

22.

Kind P , Dolan P , Gudex C , Williams A. Variations in population health status results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998;316 736-41.

23.

Ohinmaa A , Sintonen H. Quality of life of the Finnish population as measured by the EuroQol. 12th EuroQol Plenary Meeting, Barcelona, Spain, 3-6 October 1995

24.

Ohinmaa A , Sintonen H. Inconsistencies and their effects on modelling for EQ-5D. 15th EuroQol Plenary Meeting, Hannover, Germany, 1-3 October 1998.

25.

Dolan P , Kind P Inconsistency and health state valuations. Soc Sci Med 1996,42.609-15