The Unconscious Thought Effect in Clinical Decision Making: An Example in Diagnosis

Abstract

The unconscious thought effect refers to improved judgments and decisions after a period of distraction. The authors studied the unconscious thought effect in a complex and error-prone part of clinical decision making: diagnosis. Their aim was to test whether conscious versus unconscious processing influenced diagnosis of psychiatric cases. They used case descriptions from the DSM-IV casebook. Half of the participants were randomly assigned to the conscious-processing-condition (i.e., consciously thinking about the information they read in the case description), the other half to the unconscious-processing condition (i.e., performing an unrelated distracter task). The main dependent measure was the total number of correct classifications. Compared to conscious processing, unconscious processing significantly increased the number of correct classifications. The results show the potential merits of unconscious processing in diagnostic decision making.

Keywords

unconscious thought effect clinical decision making diagnosis classification DSM.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed., rev. ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

Garb HN Studying the Clinician: Judgment Research and Psychological Assessment . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association ; 1998.

Evans, Jsbt. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255-78.

Hogarth RM Deciding analytically or trusting your intuition? The advantages and disadvantages of analytic and intuitive thought. In: Betsch T , Haberstroh S , eds. The Routines of Decision-Making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005. p 67-82.

Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol. 2003;28:697-720.

Sloman SA The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull . 1996;119:3-22.

Hamm RM Clinical intuition and clinical analysis: expertise and the cognitive continuum . In: Elstein AS , Dowie J , eds. Professional Judgment: A Reader in Clinical Decision Making. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1988. p 78-105.

De Vries M. , Holland RW , Witteman CLM. In the winning mood: affect in the Iowa gambling task. Judgment Decis Making. 2008;3:42-50.

Dijksterhuis A. Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;87:586-98.

10.

Epstein S. , Pacini R. , Denes-Raj V. , Heider H. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71:390-405.

11.

Strick M. , Dijksterhuis A. , Van Baaren RB Unconscious thought effects take place off-line, not on-line. Psychol Sci. In press.

12.

Nørretranders T. The User illusion: Cutting Consciousness Down to Size. New York: Viking; 1998.

13.

Wilson TD Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ; 2002.

14.

Wilson TD , Lisle D. , Schooler JW , Hodges SD , Klaaren KJ , LaFleur SJ Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1993;19:331-9.

15.

Dijksterhuis A. , Bos MW , Nordgren LF , van Baaren RB On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. Science. 2006;311:1005-7.

16.

Dijksterhuis A. , Nordgren LF A theory of unconscious thought . Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006;1:95-109.

17.

Kim NS , Ahn W. Clinical psychologists’ theory-based representations of mental disorders predict their diagnostic reasoning and memory. J Exp Psychol . 2002;131:451-76.

18.

Dijksterhuis A. , Bos MW , Van der Leij A. , Van Baaren RB Predicting soccer matches after unconscious and conscious thought as a function of expertise . Psychol Sci. 2009;20:1381-7.

19.

Koster van Groos GAS. DSM-IV Caseboek [DSM-IV case book]. Amsterdam: Harcourt Assessment BV; 2004.

20.

Frances A. , Ross R. DSM-IV-TR Case Studies : A Clinical Guide to Differential Diagnosis. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2001.

21.

Witteman CLM , Van den Bercken JHL. Intermediate effects in psychodiagnostic classification. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2007 ;23: 56-61.

22.

Bos MW , Dijksterhuis A. , Van Baaren RB On the goal-dependency of unconscious thought. J Exp Soc Psychol . 2008;44: 1114-20.

23.

Ham J. , Van den Bos K. , Van Doorn E. Lady Justice thinks unconsciously: unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments. Soc Cogn. 2009;27:509-21.

24.

Lerouge D. Evaluating the benefits of distraction on product evaluations: the mindset effect. J Consumer Res. 2009;36:367-79.

25.

González-Vallejo C. , Lassiter GD , Belleza FS , Lindberg MJ ‘‘Save angels perhaps’’: a critical examination of the unconscious thought theory and the deliberation-without-attention effect. Rev Gen Psychol. 2008;12:282-96.

26.

Lassiter GD , Lindberg MJ , Belleza FS , González-Vallejo C. , Phillips ND The deliberation-without-attention-effect: evidence for an artifactual interpretation . Psychol Sci. 2009;20:671-5.

27.

Strick M. , Dijksterhuis A. , Bos MW , Sjoerdsma A. , Van Baaren RB , Nordgren L. A Meta-Analysis on Unconscious Thought Effects. Manuscript in preparation; see www.unconsciouslab.com.

28.

Sedlmeier P. From associations to intuitive judgment and decision making: implicitly learning from experience. In: Betsch T , Haberstroh S , eds. The Routines of Decision Making. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005. p 83-99.

29.

Kostopoulou O. , Oudhoff J. , Nath R. , et al. Predictors of diagnostic accuracy and safe management in difficult diagnostic problems in family medicine. Med Decis Making. 2008 ;28:668-80.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.71 MB