Background. The Rasch model prescribes procedures to ensure that a scale constructed from multiple items conforms to fundamental requirements of interval scales of measurement. Objective. To test the Rasch properties of the domains of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument–abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF) in depressed patients from primary care settings. Design. Cross-sectional, cross-national study. Setting. Primary care. Patients. The sample consisted of 1193 patients having a confirmed diagnosis of depression from 6 countries (Australia, Brazil, Israel, Russia, Spain, and the United States) involved in the Longitudinal Investigation of Depression Outcomes (LIDO) study. Measurements. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) diagnosed depression, whereas the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) assessed severity of depression. The WHOQOL-BREF measured generic quality of life (QOL). Results. Three of the 4 WHOQOL-BREF domains (physical, psychological, and environment) conform to the Rasch model expectations, following adjustments required mainly because of individual item misfit or differential item functioning (DIF) due to age or country. The social domain showed relatively poor psychometric properties, as observed in previous studies. Conclusions. The Rasch analysis demonstrated that, with some modifications, all domains of the WHOQOL-BREF, except for the social domain, provide an interval scale measure of generic subjective QOL in the context of depressed primary care patients in 6 countries worldwide.
SkevingtonSMLotfyMO’ConnellKA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299–310.
2.
The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–8.
3.
MerbitzCMorrisJGripJC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(4):308–12.
4.
RaschG. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research; 1960.
5.
TesioL. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:105–15.
6.
NorquistJMFitzpatrickRDawsonJJenkinsonC. Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Med Care. 2004;42(1, Suppl):I25–36.
7.
PrietoLAlonsoJLamarcaR. Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1(1):27.
8.
MallinsonTStelmackJVelozoC. A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in the creation of minimum item sets. Med Care. 2004;42(1, Suppl):I17–24.
9.
AndrichDSheridanBLuoG. RUMM 2020: A Windows Program for Analysing Item Response Data According to Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Models. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory; 2004.
10.
EyresSCareyAGilworthGNeumannVTennantA. Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(8):878–87.
11.
ConaghanPGEmertonMTennantA. Internal construct validity of the Oxford Knee Scale: evidence from Rasch measurement. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(8):1363–7.
12.
CovicTPallantJFConaghanPGTennantA. A longitudinal evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression scale (CES-D) in a rheumatoid arthritis population using Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:41–7.
13.
KeenanAMRedmondACHortonMConaghanPGTennantA. The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(1):88–93.
14.
KutlaySKucukdeveciAAElhanAHYavuzerGTennantA. Validation of the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State (MEAMS) as a cognitive screening test in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(4):315–21.
15.
McKennaSPDowardLCMeadsDMTennantALawtonGGruegerJ. Quality of life in infants and children with atopic dermatitis: addressing issues of differential item functioning across countries in multinational clinical trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:45–52.
16.
TennantAConaghanPG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(8):1358–62.
17.
PallantJFMillerRLTennantA. Evaluation of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale using Rasch analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2006;6:28–37.
18.
PallantJFTennantA. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46(Pt 1):1–18.
19.
TennantAMcKennaSPHagellP. Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value Health. 2004;7(Suppl 1):S22–6.
20.
LawtonGLundgren-NilssonABiering-SorensenF. Cross-cultural validity of FIM in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(12):746–52.
21.
SladeAFearJTennantA. Identifying patients at risk of nursing home admission: the Leeds Elderly Assessment Dependency Screening tool (LEADS). BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:31.
22.
TennantAKucukdeveciAAKutlaySElhanAH. Assessing normative cut points through differential item functioning analysis: an example from the adaptation of the Middlesex Elderly Assessment of Mental State (MEAMS) for use as a cognitive screening test in Turkey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:18.
23.
RochaNSFleckM. Validity of the Brazilian version of WHOQOL-BREF in primary care depressed patients using Rasch modelling. Rev Saude Publica. 2009;43:147–53.
24.
FrybackDGPaltaMCherepanovDBoltDKimJS. Comparison of 5 health-related quality-of-life indexes using item response theory analysis. Med Decis Making. 2010;30:5–15.
25.
AndrichD. Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms?Med Care. 2004;42(1, Suppl):I7–16.
26.
WrightBDStoneMH. Best Test Design. Chicago: MESA Press; 1979.
27.
BondTGFoxCM. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 2nd ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
TennantAPentaMTesioL. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med Care. 2004;42(1, Suppl):I37–48.
30.
HambletonRKPatsulaL. Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Soc Indic Res. 1998;45:153–71.
31.
MarwahaSJohnsonSBebbingtonP. Correlates of subjective quality of life in people with schizophrenia: findings from the EuroSC study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196(2):87–94.
32.
ShimEJMehnertAKoyamaA. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer: a cross-cultural survey of German, Japanese, and South Korean patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;99(3):341–50.
33.
AignerMForster-StreffleurSPrauseWFreidlMWeissMBachM. What does the WHOQOL-Bref measure? Measurement overlap between quality of life and depressive symptomatology in chronic somatoform pain disorder. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41(1):81–6.
34.
AngermeyerMCHolzingerAMatschingerHStenglerWenzkeK. Depression and quality of life: results of a follow-up study. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2002;48(3):189–99.
35.
Ay-WoanPSarahCPLyinnCTsyr-JangCPing-ChuanH. Quality of life in depression: predictive models. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(1):39–48.
36.
KuehnerC. Subjective quality of life: validity issues with depressed patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;106(1):62–70.
37.
NaumannVJByrneGJ. WHOQOL-BREF as a measure of quality of life in older patients with depression. Int Psychogeriatr. 2004;16(2):159–73.
38.
PapakostasGIPetersenTMahalYMischoulonDNierenbergAAFavaM. Quality of life assessments in major depressive disorder: a review of the literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26(1):13–7.
39.
PyneJMPattersonTLKaplanRMGillinJCKochWLGrantI. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with major depression. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48(2):224–30.
40.
BechPLucasRAmirMBushnellDMartinMBueschingD. Association between clinically depressed subgroups, type of treatment and patient retention in the LIDO study. Psychol Med. 2003;33(6):1051–9.
41.
DiehrPHDerlethAMMcKennaSP. Synchrony of change in depressive symptoms, health status, and quality of life in persons with clinical depression. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:27–36.
42.
HerrmanHPatrickDLDiehrP. Longitudinal investigation of depression outcomes in primary care in six: the LIDO study. Functional status, health service use and treatment of people with depressive symptoms. Psychol Med. 2002;32(5):889–902.
43.
LimaAFFleckMP. Subsyndromal depression: an impact on quality of life?J Affect Disord. 2007;100(1–3):163–9.
44.
FleckMPLimaAFLouzadaS. Association of depressive symptoms and social functioning in primary care service, Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2002;36(4):431–8.
45.
FleckMPSimonGHerrmanHBushnellDMartinMPatrickD. Major depression and its correlates in primary care settings in six countries: 9-month follow-up study. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;186:41–7.
46.
PowerMQuinnKSchmidtS. Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(10):2197–214.
47.
ChisholmDAmirMFleckM. Longitudinal Investigation of Depression Outcomes (The LIDO Study) in primary care in six countries: comparative assessment of local health systems and resource utilization. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2001;10(2):59–71.
48.
RadloffLS. The CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;I:385–401.
49.
RobinsLNWingJWittchenHU. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(12):1069–77.
50.
WeillerELecrubierYMaierWUstunTB. The relevance of recurrent brief depression in primary care: a report from the WHO project on Psychological Problems in General Health Care conducted in 14 countries. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994;244(4):182–9.
51.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
52.
The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403–9.
53.
DerogatisLRLipmanRSRickelsKUhlenhuthEHCoviL. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a measure of primary symptom dimensions. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatr. 1974;7:79–110.
54.
HuntSMMcKennaSP. The QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy. 1992;22(3):307–19.
55.
WareJEJrSherbourneCD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.
56.
SeppaKMakelaRSillanaukeeP. Effectiveness of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in occupational health screenings. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1995;19(4):999–1003.
57.
MastersGN. Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149–74.
StreinerDLNormanGR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
60.
AndrichD. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43:561–73.
61.
TeresiJA. Overview of quantitative measurement methods: equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications. Med Care. 2006;44(11, Suppl 3):S39–49.
62.
TeresiJA. Different approaches to differential item functioning in health applications: advantages, disadvantages and some neglected topics. Med Care. 2006;44(11, Suppl 3):S152–70.
63.
HagquistCAndrichD. Is the Sense of Coherence-instrument applicable on adolescents? A latent trait analysis using Raschmodelling. Pers Individ Dif. 2004;36(4):955–68.
AndrichD. A latent trait model for items with response dependencies: implications for test construction and analysis. In: EmbretsonSE ed. Test Design. New York: Academic Press; 1985. p 245–75.
67.
van der VeldeGBeatonDHogg-JohnstonSHurwitzETennantA. Rasch analysis provides new insights into the measurement properties of the neck disability index. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(4):544–51.
68.
SmithEV. Detecting and evaluation the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:205–31.
69.
TennantAPallantJF. Unidimensionality matters! (a tale of two Smiths?). Rasch Meas Trans. 2006;20(1):1048–51.
AtkinsonMZibinSChuangH. Characterizing quality of life among patients with chronic mental illness: a critical examination of the self-report methodology. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(1):99–105.
72.
BerlimMTPavanelloDPCaldieraroMAFleckMP. Reliability and validity of the WHOQOL BREF in a sample of Brazilian outpatients with major depression. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(2):561–4.
73.
LeplegeAEEcosseE. Methodological issues in using the Rasch model to select cross culturally equivalent items in order to develop a quality of life index: the analysis of four WHOQOL-100 data sets (Argentina, France, Hong Kong, United Kingdom). J Appl Meas. 2000;1:372–92.
74.
SchmidtSDebensasonDMuhlanH. The DISABKIDS generic quality of life instrument showed cross-cultural validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(6):587–98.
75.
SaxenaSJane-LlopisEHosmanC. Prevention of mental and behavioural disorders: implications for policy and practice. World Psychiatry. 2006;5(1):5–14.
76.
SmithEVJr. Evidence for the reliability of measures and validity of measure interpretation: a Rasch measurement perspective. J Appl Meas. 2001;2(3):281–311.
77.
CosteJBoueeSEcosseELeplegeAPouchotJ. Methodological issues in determining the dimensionality of composite health measures using principal component analysis: case illustration and suggestions for practice. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(3):641–54.
78.
YaoGWuCH. Factorial invariance of the WHOQOL-BREF among disease groups. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(8):1881–8.
79.
TrivediMHRushAJWisniewskiSR. Factors associated with health-related quality of life among outpatients with major depressive disorder: a STAR*D report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(2):185–95.
