Background. Few studies have compared multiple health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instruments simultaneously for pediatric populations. This study aimed to test psychometric properties of 4 legacy pediatric HRQOL instruments: the Child Health and Illness Profile (CHIP), the KIDSCREEN-52, the KINDL, and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Methods. This study used data from 908 parents whose children (ages 2–19 years) were enrolled in Florida Medicaid. Parents were asked via telephone interview to complete each instrument appropriate to the age of their children. Structural, convergent/discriminant, and known-group validities were investigated. We examined structural validity using confirmatory factor analyses. We examined convergent/discriminant validity by comparing Spearman rank correlation coefficients of homogeneous (physical functioning and physical well-being) versus heterogeneous (physical and psychological functioning) domains of the instruments. We assessed known-groups validity by examining the extent to which HRQOL differed by the status of children with special health needs (CSHCN). Results. Domain scores of the 4 instruments were not normally distributed, and ceiling effects were significant in most domains. The KIDSCREEN-52 demonstrates the best structural validity, followed by the CHIP, KINDL, and PedsQL. The PedsQL and the KIDSCREEN-52 show better convergent/discriminant validity than the other instruments. Known-groups validity in discriminating CSHCN versus no needs was the best for the PedsQL, followed by the KIDSCREEN-52, the CHIP, and the KINDL. Conclusion. No one instrument was fully satisfactory in all psychometric properties. Strategies are recommended for future comparison of item content and measurement properties across different HRQOL instruments for research and clinical use.
VarniJWBurwinkleTMLaneMM. Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:34.
2.
De CivitaMRegierDAlamgirAHAnisAHFitzgeraldMJMarraCA. Evaluating health-related quality-of-life studies in paediatric populations: some conceptual, methodological and developmental considerations and recent applications. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23:659–85.
3.
DetmarSBMullerMJSchornagelJHWeverLDVAaronsonNK. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:3027–34.
4.
EspallarguesMValderasJMAlonsoJ. Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Med Care. 2000;38:175–86.
5.
HigginsonIJCarrAJ. Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ. 2001;322:1297–300.
6.
WolfeJGrierHEKlarN. Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:326–33.
7.
VarniJWSetoguchiY. Screening for behavioral and emotional problems in children and adolescents with congenital or acquired limb deficiencies. Am J Dis Child. 1992;146:103–7.
8.
SolansMPaneSEstradaM. Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: a systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value Health. 2008;11:742–64.
9.
StarfieldBRileyAWGreenBF. The adolescent child health and illness profile: a population-based measure of health. Med Care. 1995;33:553–66.
10.
Ravens-SiebererUGoschARajmilL. KIDSCREEN-52: quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2005;5:353–64.
11.
Ravens-SiebererUBullingerM. Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: first psychometric and content analytical results. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:399–407.
12.
VarniJWSeidMRodeCA. The PedsQL™: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care. 1999;37:126–39.
13.
DavisEWatersEMackinnonA. Paediatric quality of life instruments: a review of the impact of the conceptual framework on outcomes. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:311–8.
14.
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: use in medicinal product development to support labeling claims. Fed Reg. 2009;71:5862–3.
15.
RileyAW. Evidence that school-age children can self-report on their health. Ambul Pediatr. 2004;4:371–6.
16.
VarniJLimbersCBurwinkleT. Parent proxy-report of their children’s health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents’ reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQLTM 4.0 generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:2.
17.
WatersE. Quality of life. In: MoyerV, ed. Evidence-Based Pediatrics and Child Health. London: British Medical Journal Books; 2000.
18.
CampoJVComerDMJansen-McWilliamsLGardnerWKelleherKJ. Recurrent pain, emotional distress, and health service use in childhood. J Pediatr. 2002;141:76–83.
19.
JanickeDMFinneyJWRileyAW. Children’s health care use: a prospective investigation of factors related to care-seeking. Med Care. 2001;39:990–1001.
20.
SeidMVarniJWBermudezLO. Parents’ perceptions of primary care: measuring parents’ experiences of pediatric primary care quality. Pediatrics. 2001;108:264–70.
21.
WadeTJGuoJJ. Linking improvements in health-related quality of life to reductions in Medicaid costs among students who use school-based health centers. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:1611–6.
22.
SeidMVarniJWSegallDKurtinPS. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of pediatric healthcare costs: a two-year prospective cohort analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:48.
23.
BrunnerHITaylorJBrittoMT. Differences in disease outcomes between Medicaid and privately insured children: possible health disparities in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2006;55:378–84.
24.
Ravens-SiebererUErhartMWilleNWetzelRNickelJBullingerM. Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents: methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24:1199–220.
25.
EiserCMorseR. A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84:205–11.
26.
WallanderJLSchmittMKootHM. Quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: Issues, instruments, and applications. J Clin Psychol. 2001;57:571–85.
27.
ConnollyMAJohnsonJA. Measuring quality of life in paediatric patients. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;16:605–25.
28.
Ravens-SiebererUGoschARajmilL. The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Value Health. 2008;11:645–58.
29.
FayersPMMachinD. Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
30.
WatersEDavisERonenGMRosenbaumPLivingstonMSaigalS. Quality of life instruments for children and adolescents with neurodisabilities: how to choose the appropriate instrument. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:660–9.
31.
Institute of Medicine. Children’s Health, the Nation’s Wealth: Assessing and Improving Child Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
32.
RileyAWForrestCBStarfieldBRebokGWRobertsonJAGreenBF. The parent report form of the CHIP-child edition: reliability and validity. Med Care. 2004;42:210–20.
33.
The KIDSCREEN Group Europe. The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires: Quality of Life Questionnaires for Children and Adolescents. Handbook. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers; 2006.
34.
BethellCDReadDSteinREKBlumbergSJWellsNNewacheckPW. Identifying children with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument. Ambul Pediatr. 2002;2:38–48.
HuLBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model. 1999;6:1–55.
37.
CampbellDTFiskeDW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959;58:81–105.
38.
VarniJWBurwinkleTMSeidMSkarrD. The PedsQL™* 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3:329–41.
39.
NormanGRStreinerDL. Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1998.
40.
FayersPMMachinD. Chapter 4: scores and measurements: validity, reliability, sensitivity. In: Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
41.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
42.
WareJJrKosinskiMKellerSD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.
43.
SnedecorGWCochranWG. Statistical Methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1967.
44.
WareJEKosinskiMBjornerJTurner-BowkerBGandekME. User’s Manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2007.
45.
McHorneyCAWareJEJrRaczekAE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.
46.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2009.
47.
RileyAWForrestCBRebokGW. The child report form of the CHIP-child edition: reliability and validity. Med Care. 2004;42:221–31.
48.
ErhartMEllertUKurthBRavens-SiebererU. Measuring adolescents’ HRQoL via self reports and parent proxy reports: an evaluation of the psychometric properties of both versions of the KINDL-R instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:77.
49.
LeBovidgeJSLavigneJVDonenbergGRMillerML. Psychological adjustment of children and adolescents with chronic arthritis: a meta-analytic review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28:29–39.
50.
MartinezWCarterJSLegatoLJ. Social competence in children with chronic illness: a meta-analytic review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011;36:878–90.
51.
LeeAM. Using the ICF-CY to organise characteristics of children’s functioning. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:605–16.
52.
McDougallJWrightVSchmidtJMillerLLowryK. Applying the ICF framework to study changes in quality-of-life for youth with chronic conditions. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14:41–53.
53.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
54.
SchiaritiVFayedNCiezaAKlassenAO’DonnellM. Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures for cerebral palsy based on the international classification of functioning. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1330–9.
55.
HambletonRKJonesRW. Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices. 1993;12:38–47.
56.
HaysRDMoralesLSReiseSP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care. 2000;38:II28–42.
57.
VarniJWBurwinkleTMRapoffMAKampsJLOlsonN. The PedsQL™ in pediatric asthma: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life Inventory™ generic core scales and asthma module. J Behav Med. 2004;27:297–318.
58.
YeattsKBStuckyBThissenD. Construction of the pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS) for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). J Asthma. 2010;47:295–302.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
