Objective. Research testing the concept of decision-making styles in specific contexts such as health care–related choices is missing. Therefore, we examine the contextuality of Scott and Bruce’s (1995) General Decision-Making Style Inventory with respect to patient choice situations. Methods. Scott and Bruce’s scale was adapted for use as a patient decision-making style inventory. In total, 388 German patients who underwent elective joint surgery responded to a questionnaire about their provider choice. Confirmatory factor analyses within 2 independent samples assessed factorial structure, reliability, and validity of the scale. Results. The final 4-dimensional, 13-item patient decision-making style inventory showed satisfactory psychometric properties. Data analyses supported reliability and construct validity. Besides the intuitive, dependent, and avoidant style, a new subdimension, called “comparative” decision-making style, emerged that originated from the rational dimension of the general model. Conclusions. This research provides evidence for the contextuality of decision-making style to specific choice situations. Using a limited set of indicators, this report proposes the patient decision-making style inventory as valid and feasible tool to assess patients’ decision propensities.
ScottSGBruceRA. Decision-making style: the development and assessment of a new measure. Educ Psychol Meas. 1995;55(5):818–31.
2.
BetschCIannelloP. Measuring individual differences in intuitive and deliberative decision making styles: a comparison of different measures.
In: GlöcknerAWittemanC eds. Tracing Intuition: Recent Methods in Measuring Intuitive and Deliberate Processes in Decision Making. London: Psychology Press; 2010. p 251–67.
3.
CurşeuPLSchruijerSGL. Decision styles and rationality: an analysis of the predictive validity of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory. Educ Psychol Meas. 2012;72(6):1053–62.
4.
ThunholmP. Decision-making style: habit, style or both?Pers Indiv Differ. 2004;36(4):931–44.
5.
Bruine de BruinWParkerAMFischhoffB. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92(5):938–56.
6.
LooR. A psychometric evaluation of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory. Pers Indiv Differ. 2000;29(5):895–905.
7.
MoreraOFMaydeu-OlivaresANygrenTEWhiteRJFernandezNPSkewesMC. Social problem solving predicts decision making styles among US Hispanics. Pers Indiv Differ. 2006;41(2):307–17.
8.
ParkerAMBruinedeBruinWFischhoffB. Maximizers versus satisficers: decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes. Judgm Decis Mak. 2007;2(6):342–50.
9.
RussFAMcNeillyKMComerJM. Leadership, decision making and performance of sales managers: a multi-level approach. J Pers Selling Sales Manage. 1996;16(3):1–15.
10.
SinghRGreenhausJH. The relation between career decision-making strategies and person-job fit: a study of job changers. J Vocat Behav. 2004;64(1):198–221.
11.
SpicerDPSadler-SmithE. An examination of the general decision making style questionnaire in two UK samples. J Manag Psychol. 2005;20(2):137–49.
12.
GambettiEFabbriMBensiLTonettiL. A contribution to the Italian validation of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory. Pers Indiv Differ. 2008;44(4):842–52.
13.
BaioccoRLaghiFD’AlessioM. Decision-making style among adolescents: relationship with sensation seeking and locus of control. J Adolescence. 2009;32(4):963–76.
14.
GafniACharlesCWhelanT. The physician-patient encounter: the physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(3):347–54.
15.
CriéDChebatJ-C. Health marketing: toward an integrative perspective. J Bus Res. 2012;66(1):123–6.
16.
SimonHA. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. Am Econ Rev. 1959;49(3):253–83.
17.
KahnemanD. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol. 2003;58(9):697–720.
18.
JungKFeldmanRScanlonD. Where would you go for your next hospitalization?J Health Econ. 2011;30(4):832–41.
19.
de GrootIBOttenWDijs-ElsingaJSmeetsHJKievitJMarang-van de MheenPJ. Choosing between hospitals: the influence of the experiences of other patients. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(6):764–78.
20.
MoserAKorstjensIvan der WeijdenTTangeH. Patient’s decision making in selecting a hospital for elective orthopaedic surgery. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(6):1262–8.
21.
FlynnKESmithMAVannessD. A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(5):1158–69.
22.
BrislinRW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cultural Psychol. 1970;1(3):185–216.
23.
BrehautJCO’ConnorAMWoodTJ. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003;23(4):281–92.
24.
ChouC-PBentlerPM. Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In: HoyleRH, ed. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995. p 37–55.
25.
CurranPJWestSGFinchJF. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(1):16–29.
26.
BagozziRPYiY. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci. 1988;16(1):74–94.
27.
FornellCLarckerDF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mar Res. 1981;18(1):39–50.
28.
HuLBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55.
29.
BagozziRP. The role of measurement in theory construction and hypothesis testing: toward a holistic model. In: FerrellOCBrownSWLambCW eds. Conceptual and Theoretical Developments in Marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association; 1979, p 15–32.
30.
GatiIGadassiRMashiah-CohenR. Career decision-making profiles vs. styles: convergent and incremental validity. J Vocat Behav. 2012;81(1):2–16.
31.
PayneJWBettmanJRJohnsonEJ. The Adaptive Decision Maker. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
32.
HibbardJHSlovicPJewettJJ. Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision-making research. Milbank Q. 1997;75(3):395–414.
33.
SchwartzJLuceMFArielyD. Are consumers too trusting? The effects of relationships with expert advisers. J Mar Res. 2011;48(Special issue 2011):S163–74.
34.
DewberryCJuanchichMNarendranS. The latent structure of decision styles. Pers Indiv Differ. 2013;54(2013):566–71.
