Background. The Operations Research Interest Group (ORIG) within the Society of Medical Decision Making (SMDM) is a multidisciplinary interest group of professionals that specializes in taking an analytical approach to medical decision making and healthcare delivery. ORIG is interested in leveraging mathematical methods associated with the field of Operations Research (OR) to obtain data-driven solutions to complex healthcare problems and encourage collaborations across disciplines. This paper introduces OR for the non-expert and draws attention to opportunities where OR can be utilized to facilitate solutions to healthcare problems. Methods. Decision making is the process of choosing between possible solutions to a problem with respect to certain metrics. OR concepts can help systematically improve decision making through efficient modeling techniques while accounting for relevant constraints. Depending on the problem, methods that are part of OR (e.g., linear programming, Markov Decision Processes) or methods that are derived from related fields (e.g., regression from statistics) can be incorporated into the solution approach. This paper highlights the characteristics of different OR methods that have been applied to healthcare decision making and provides examples of emerging research opportunities. Examples. We illustrate OR applications in healthcare using previous studies, including diagnosis and treatment of diseases, organ transplants, and patient flow decisions. Further, we provide a selection of emerging areas for utilizing OR. Conclusions. There is a timely need to inform practitioners and policy makers of the benefits of using OR techniques in solving healthcare problems. OR methods can support the development of sustainable long-term solutions across disease management, service delivery, and health policies by optimizing the performance of system elements and analyzing their interaction while considering relevant constraints.
Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the U.S. Health System. Hospital-based emergency care: at the breaking point. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
2.
WHO, Dept of HIV/AIDS and Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO/TDR). Operational research to support HIV treatment and prevention in resource-limited settings – Summary of activities, July 2004 to January 2006. Available from: URL: www.who.int/hiv/topics/or/en/index.html.
3.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). Report to the President - Better Health Care and Lower Costs: Accelerating Improvement Through Systems Engineering. Washington DC, Executive Office of the President; 2014). Available from: URL: http://www.imedicalapps.com/2015/10/ibm-watson-health-cloud-extend-reach.
4.
PorterMELeeTH.The strategy that will fix health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;91:50–70.
5.
HillierFSLiebermanGJ.Introduction to Operations Research. 9th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
6.
RiskoRMerdanSWomblePRBarnettCYeZLinsellSMMontieJEMillerDCDentonBT.Clinical predictors and recommendations for staging computed tomography scan among men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2014;84:1329–34.
7.
LibbrechtMWNobleWS.Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:321–32.
8.
WillMBertrandJFransooJC.Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2002;22:241–264.
9.
SchaeferAJBaileyMDShechterSMRobertsMS.Modeling medical treatment using Markov decision processes. In: BrandeauMLSainfortFPierskallaWP, eds. Operations Research and Health Care: A Handbook of Methods and Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2005. p 593–612.
10.
AlagozOHsuHSchaeferAJRobertsMS.Markov decision processes: a tool for sequential decision making under uncertainty. Med Decis Making. 2009;30:474–83.
11.
ZhangJMasonJEDentonBTPierskallaWP. Disease Prevention, Detection, and Treatment. In: Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. 3rd ed.Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2013. p 437–47.
12.
BrandeauMLSainfortFPierskallaWP, eds. Operations Research and Health Care: A Handbook of Methods and Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer;2004.
13.
DentonBT.Handbook of Healthcare Operations Management. New York: Springer; 2013.
14.
ZaricGS.Operations Research and Health Care Policy. New York: Springer; 2013.
15.
WinstonWLGoldbergJB.Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press;2004.
16.
BertsimasDTsitsiklisJN.Introduction to Linear Optimization. Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific; 1997.
17.
WolseyLA.Integer Programming. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
18.
PriceCGoldenBHarringtonMKonewkoRWasilEHerringW.Reducing Boarding in a Post-Anesthesia Care Unit. Production and Operations Management. 2011;20:431–41.
19.
ErnstATJiangHKrishnamoorthyMSierD.Staff scheduling and rostering: A review of applications, methods and models. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;153:3–27.
20.
KongGXuDLYangJB.Clinical decision support systems: a review on knowledge representation and inference under uncertainties. Int J Comp Intel Systems. 2008;1:159–67.
21.
DeGrootMH.Optimal Statistical Decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
22.
HowardRA.Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press; 1960.
LawAM.Simulation modeling and analysis. 4th ed.New York: Tata McGraw-Hill; 2007.
25.
BarnesSGoldenBPriceS.Applications of Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation to Healthcare Operations Management. In: DentonBT, ed. Handbook of Healthcare Operations Management. New York: Springer; 2013.
26.
RossSM.Introduction to probability models. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2014.
27.
RubinsteinRYKroeseDP.Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
28.
ZaricGS.Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Health-Care Policy, and Operations Research Models. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
29.
ZeniosSA.Modeling the transplant waiting list: A queueing model with reneging. Queueing Systems. 1999;31:239–51.
30.
FriedmanCPWongAKBlumenthalD.Achieving a nationwide learning health system. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:57cm29.
DetskyASNaglieGKrahnMDNaimarkDRedelmeierDA.Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 1—Getting started. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:123–5.
33.
SonnenbergFABeckJR. Markov models in medical decision making a practical guide. Med Decis Making. 1993;13:322–38
34.
ElwynGEdwardsAEcclesMRovnerD.Decision analysis in patient care. The Lancet. 2001;358:571–4.
35.
LoboJMDickerAPBuerkiCet al. Evaluating the clinical impact of a genomic classifier in prostate cancer using individualized decision analysis. PloS One. 2015;10:e0116866
36.
AyvaciMUSAlagozOBurnsideES. The effect of budgetary restrictions on breast cancer diagnostic decisions. Manuf Serv Oper Manag. 2012;14:600–17.
37.
DentonBTKurtMShahNDBryantSCSmithSA.Optimizing the start time of statin therapy for patients with diabetes. Med Decis Making. 2009;29:351–367.
38.
YanJAyerTKeskinocakPCaugheyA.Preference-sensitive risk cutoff values for prenatal integrated screening test for Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:645–51.
39.
DavisAEMehrotraSLadnerDPKilambiVFriedewaldJJ.Changes in geographic disparity in kidney transplantation since the final rule. Transplantation. 2014;98:931–6.
40.
GentrySEMassieABCheekSWet al. Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:2052–8.
41.
SegevDLGentrySEWarrenDSReebBMontgomeryRA.Kidney paired donation and optimizing the use of live donor organs. JAMA. 2005;293:1883–90.
42.
TangriNStevensLAGriffithJet al. A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure. JAMA. 2011;305:1553–9.
43.
MoormanJRLakeDEGriffinMP.Heart rate characteristics monitoring for neonatal sepsis. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53:126–32.
44.
HasanOMeltzerDOShaykevichSAet al. Hospital readmission in general medicine patients: a prediction model. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:211–9.
45.
SwaminathanJMAsheMDukeKMaslinLWildeL.Distributing scarce drugs for the Medpin program. Interfaces. 2004;34:353–8.
46.
EnderleJDBronzinoJD, Introduction to biomedical engineering. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2012.
47.
WebsterJG.The ten most important biomedical engineering devices. In: World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering2006:664-667. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. 2007.
KhojandiAMaillartLMProkopyevOARobertsMS.Medical decision making problems with large policy spaces: Why Markov Decision Processes Trump Simulation. Poster presentation at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making; 2014. [cited 2016August31]. Available from: https://smdm.confex.com/smdm/2014fl/webprogram/Paper8832.html
ParekhAKBartonMB.The challenge of multiple comorbidity for the US health care system. Am Med Assoc. 2010;303:1303–4.
53.
WarshawG.Introduction: advances and challenges in care of older people with chronic illness. Generations. 2006;30:5–10.
54.
FortinMLapoointeLHudonCVanasseANtetuALMaltaisD.Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:51.
55.
BartolomeoNTrerotoliPSerioG.Progression of liver cirrhosis to HCC: an application of hidden Markov model. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:1.
56.
Dall’EraMAAlbertsenPCBangmaCCarrollPRCarterHBCooperbergMRFreedlandSJKlotzLHParkerCSolowayMS.Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2012;62:976–83.
57.
BerwickDMNolanTWWhittingtonJ.The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff. 2008;27:759–69.
