Methods for Handling Unobserved Covariates in a Bayesian Update of a Cost-effectiveness Model

Abstract

Health economic decision models often involve a wide-ranging and complicated synthesis of evidence from a number of sources, making design and implementation of such models resource-heavy. When new data become available and reassessment of treatment recommendations is warranted, it may be more efficient to perform a Bayesian update of an existing model than to construct a new model. If the existing model depends on many, possibly correlated, covariates, then an update may produce biased estimates of model parameters if some of these covariates are completely absent from the new data. Motivated by the need to update a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing diagnostic strategies for coronary heart disease, this study develops methods to overcome this obstacle by either introducing additional data or using results from previous studies. We outline a framework to handle unobserved covariates, and use our motivating example to illustrate both the flexibility of the proposed methods and some potential difficulties in applying them.

Keywords

Bayesian methods cost-effectiveness probabilistic sensitivity analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Briggs

Sculpher

. An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Apr;13(4):397–409.

Briggs

Weinstein

Fenwick

et al . Model parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: A report of the ISPOR-SMDM modeling good research practices task force-6. Value Health. 2012;15:835–42.

Ades

Claxton

Sculpher

. Evidence synthesis, parameter correlation and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Health Econ. 2006 Apr;15(4):373–81.

Mason

Richardson

Plewis

Best

. Strategy for modelling non-random missing data mechanisms in observational studies using Bayesian methods. J Off Stat. 2012 June;28(2)2:279–302.

Mason

. Bayesian methods for modelling non-random missing data mechanisms in longitudinal studies. Doctoral thesis, Imperial College London; 2009. Retrieved from http://www.bias-project.org.uk/research.htm

Baio

. Bayesian methods in health economics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2012.

Claxton

Sculpher

McCabe

Briggs

Akehurst

Buxton

et al . Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: Not an optional extra. Health Econ. 2005 Feb;14(4):339–47.

Greenwood

Maredia

Radjenovic

et al . Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease: The CE-MARC study. Trials. 2009 Jul 29;10:62.

Greenwood

Maredia

Younger

et al . Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): A prospective trial. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):453–60.

10.

Walker

Girardin

McKenna

et al . Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease: An economic evaluation using data from the CE-MARC study. Heart. 2013 Jun;99(12):873–81.

11.

Fox

et al . Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA study). Lancet. 2003 Sep 6;362(9386):782–8.

12.

Briggs

Mihaylova

Sculpher

et al . Cost effectiveness of perindopril in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease using data from the EUROPA study. Heart. 2007;Sep;93(9):1081–6.

13.

Greenwood

Herzog

Brown

et al . Prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography in suspected coronary heart disease: Long-term follow-up of a prospective, diagnostic accuracy cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(1):1–9.

14.

Lunn

Thomas

Best

Spiegelhalter

. WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comp. 2000;10:325–37.

15.

Gelman

Carlin

Stern

et al . Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed.Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2013.

16.

Faria

Gomes

Epstein

White

. A guide to handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analysis conducted within randomised controlled trials. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32:1157–70.

17.

Genders

Meijboom

Meijs

et al . CT coronary angiography in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease: Decision making from various perspectives in the face of uncertainty. Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):734–44.

18.

Sharples

Hughes

Crean

et al . Cost-effectiveness of functional cardiac testing in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease: A randomised controlled trial. The CECaT trial. Health Technol Assess. 2007;Dec;11(49):iii–iv,ix–115.

19.

Gelman

Jakulin

Pittau

. A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2008;2(4):1360–83.

20.

Gelman

. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statist. Med. 2008;27:2865–73.

21.

Ghosh

Mitra

. On the use of Cauchy prior distributions for Bayesian logistic regression. Bayesian Anal. advance publication. 7March2017. doi:10.1214/17-BA1051

22.

Lunn

Jackson

Best

et al . The BUGS book: A practical introduction to Bayesian analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC;2012.

23.

Fox

Cokkinos

Deckers

et al . The ENACT study: A pan-European survey of acute coronary syndromes. European Network for Acute Coronary Treatment. Eur Heart J. 2000 Sep;21(17):1440–9.

24.

Gelman

Meng

Stern

. Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica. 1996;6:733–807.

25.

Gelman

. Exploratory data analysis for complex models. J. Comp. Graph. Stat. 13(4):755–87.

26.

Hartman

Grieve

Ramsahai

Sekhon

. From sample average treatment effect to population average treatment effect on the treated: Combining experimental with observational studies to estimate population treatment effects. J. R. Statist. Soc. A. 2015;178(3):757–78.

27.

Jackson

Best

Richardson

. Bayesian graphical models for regression on multiple data sets with different variables. Biostatistics. 2009;10(2):335–51.

28.

Jackson

Best

Richardson

. Hierarchical related regression for combining aggregate and individual data in studies of socio-economic disease risk factors. J. R. Stat. Soc. A. 2008;171(1):159–78.

29.

Molitor

Best

Jackson

Richardson

. Using Bayesian graphical models to model biases in observational studies and to combine multiple sources of data: Application to low birth weight and water disinfection by-products. J. R. Stat. Soc. A. 2009;172(3):615–37.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB