Online Decision Aids for Knee Osteoarthritis and Low Back Pain: An Environmental Scan and Evaluation

Abstract

Background. Musculoskeletal conditions are leading causes of disability. Management options are plentiful, but the current evidence base suggests many are ineffective or unproven. Online decision aids can help support patients make informed health care choices. However, there are little data on the quality of online decision aids for common musculoskeletal conditions such as knee or low back pain. Purpose. To identify all publicly available online decision aids for knee osteoarthritis and low back pain and evaluate them against the International Patient Decision Aids Standards Inventory (IPDASi). Data Sources. Google Australia. Study selection. Two reviewers independently screened websites for inclusion and assessed the quality of included online decision aids between April and May 2018. Included online decision aids were free, provided information about knee osteoarthritis or low back pain, and written in English. Online decision aids that required payment, targeted health professionals, addressed rheumatoid arthritis, or addressed a screening decision were excluded. Data Extraction. IPDASi Version 4. Data Synthesis. Twenty-five online decision aids were identified: 15 knee osteoarthritis and 10 low back pain. Only 3 online decision aids (12%) provided a “wait-and-see” option. Nineteen (75%) met IPDASi criteria to be considered a decision aid and 3 (12%) met IPDASi criteria to state that the online decision aid was unbiased. Limitations. Dynamic nature of Google searches may not be replicable easily. Conclusions. Few good-quality online decision aids are available for people with knee osteoarthritis or low back pain. Most online decision aids failed to explicitly provide a wait-and-see option, suggesting a bias toward intervention. These online decision aids would benefit from explicitly highlighting a wait-and-see option to support informed choice.

Keywords

decision aid evaluation low back pain knee osteoarthritis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Murray

CJL

Vos

Lozano

, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223.

Gomez-Gaian

Pérez-Alonso

Callejon-Ferre

A-J

Lopez-Martinez

. Musculoskeletal disorders: OWAS review. Industrial Health. 2017;55(4):314–37.

Min

Chan

VWY

Aristizabal

, et al. Clinical decision support decreases volume of imaging for low back pain in an urban emergency department. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(7):889–99.

Traeger

Buchbinder

Harris

Maher

. Diagnosis and management of low-back pain in primary care. Can Med Assoc J. 2017;189(45):E1386–95.

Blackmore

Mecklenburg

Kaplan

. Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8(1):19–25.

McKinnis

. Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Imaging. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Davis; 2014.

Siemieniuk

RAC

Harris

Agoritsas

, et al. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee arthritis and meniscal tears: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2017;357:j1982.

Healey

Afolabi

Lewis

, et al. Uptake of the NICE osteoarthritis guidelines in primary care: a survey of older adults with joint pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):295.

Foster

Anema

Cherkin

, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368–83.

10.

Elwyn

Frosch

Thomson

, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.

11.

Elwyn

O’Connor

Stacey

, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006;333(7565):417.

12.

Joseph-Williams

Newcombe

Politi

, et al. Toward minimum standards for certifying patient decision aids: a modified Delphi consensus process. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(6):699–710.

13.

Stacey

Légaré

Lewis

, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(4):CD001431.

14.

Hersch

Barratt

Jansen

, et al. Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9978):1642–52.

15.

Mann

Ponieman

Montori

Arciniega

McGinn

. The Statin Choice decision aid in primary care: a randomized trial. Patient Educ Counsel. 2010;80(1):138–40.

16.

Rego

Nagiah

. Over-imaging in uncomplicated low back pain: a 12-month audit of a general medical unit. Intern Med J. 2016;46(12):1437–9.

17.

Chou

Carrino

Deyo

. Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9662):463–72.

18.

Patel

Ngunjiri

Hee

, et al. Primum non nocere: shared informed decision making in low back pain—a pilot cluster randomised trial. BMC Musculoskel Disord. 2014;15(1):282.

19.

Sakellariou

Conaghan

Zhang

, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in the clinical management of peripheral joint osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(9):1484–94.

20.

McMullan

. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient–health professional relationship. Patient Educ Counsel. 2006;63(1):24–8.

21.

Cline

RJW

Haynes

. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(6):671–92.

22.

Saunders

Elwyn

Kirkland

Durand

M-A

. Serious choices: a protocol for an environmental scan of patient decision aids for seriously ill people at risk of death facing choices about life-sustaining treatments. Patient. 2018;11(1):97–106.

23.

Donnelly

Thompson

. Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids. BMJ Open. 2015;5(7).

24.

Diouf

Menear

Robitaille

Painchaud Guérard

Légaré

. Training health professionals in shared decision making: Update of an international environmental scan. Patient Educ Counsel. 2016;99(11):1753–8.

25.

Aslakson

Schuster

ALR

Miller

Weiss

Volandes

Bridges

JFP

. An environmental scan of advance care planning decision aids for patients undergoing major surgery: a study protocol. Patient. 2014;7(2):207–17.

26.

Légaré

Politi

Drolet

Desroches

Stacey

Bekker

. Training health professionals in shared decision-making: an international environmental scan. Patient Educ Counsel. 2012;88(2):159–69.

27.

Bonner

Fajardo

Hui

Stubbs

Trevena

. Clinical validity, understandability, and actionability of online cardiovascular disease risk calculators: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e29.

28.

Downie

Hancock

Jenkins

, et al. How common is imaging for low back pain in primary and emergency care? Systematic review and meta-analysis of over 4 million imaging requests across 21 years [published online February 13, 2019]. Br J Sports Med.

29.

Qaseem

Wilt

McLean

Forciea

. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):514–30.

30.

Donnelly

Elwyn

Thompson

. Quantity over quality: findings from a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids on early abortion methods. Health Expectations. 2018;21(1):316–26.

31.

Fajardo

Harris

Naidoo

Trevena

Bonner

. Systematic review and evaluation of freely available online diabetes medication decision aids. Eur J Person Centred Health Care. In press.

32.

Trevena

Zikmund-Fisher

Edwards

, et al. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med Inform Decis. 2013;13(2):S7.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB