Improving Patient Preparedness and Confidence in Discussing Advance Directives for End-of-Life Care with Health Care Providers in the United States and Japan
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2021
Improving Patient Preparedness and Confidence in Discussing Advance Directives for End-of-Life Care with Health Care Providers in the United States and Japan
The low completion rate of advance directives (ADs) has received attention in Japan and the United States, as policy makers and health care professionals face aging populations with multiple comorbidities. Among the barriers to AD planning, cultural values and attitudes appear to be particularly influential. A comparison of culturally distinct societies provides a deeper understanding of these barriers. Through such an approach, this study identifies strategies for increasing AD planning among late-middle-age Japanese and US individuals.
Methods
After giving informed consent for the Institutional Review Board–approved study, Japanese and US respondents (45–65 y; 50% female) without ADs completed a language-appropriate online survey. Participants were asked to review a decision aid as part of a scenario-based physician consultation regarding artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH). Hypotheses were analyzed using multigroup structural equation modeling.
Results
Important similarities were identified across the 2 groups. After reviewing the decision aid, both samples strongly preferred “no ANH.” Respondents who strongly valued either self-reliance or interpersonal relationships experienced greater preparedness for AD planning. In both countries, greater decision preparedness and positive death attitude predicted greater confidence to discuss care options with a provider. Finally, cultural values predicted preference for family participation: respondents with a strong interdependent self-concept desired more family involvement, whereas high independents preferred less.
Conclusions
Findings indicate the importance of documenting care preferences and accounting for individual differences. To increase AD adoption, providers should identify patient segments likely to benefit most from the interventions. Targeting individuals in both countries who value self-reliance and interpersonal relationships appears to be a good place to begin. Such individuals can be identified clinically through administration of validated measures used in this study.
DowneyLAuDHCurtisJREngelbergRA.Life-sustaining treatment preferences: matches and mismatches between patients’ preferences and clinicians’ perceptions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;46(1):9–19.
2.
GrecoPJSchulmanKALavizzo-MoureyRHansen-FlaschenJ.The Patient Self-Determination Act and the future of advance directives. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(8):639–43.
3.
Nedjat-HaiemFRCadetTJAmatyaAMishraS.Healthcare providers’ attitudes, knowledge, and practice behaviors for educating patients about advance directives: a national survey. Am J Hospice Palliat Med. 2019;36(5):387–95.
4.
HoubenCHMSpruitMAGroenenMTJWoutersEFMJanssenDJA. Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(7):477–89.
5.
BarnesSGardinerCGottM, et al. Enhancing patient-professional communication about end-of-life issues in life-limiting conditions; a critical review of the literature. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44(6):866–79.
6.
Kermel-SchiffmanIWernerP.Knowledge regarding advance care planning: a systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;73:133–42.
7.
SilveiraMJKimSYHLangaKM.Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1211–81.
8.
RaoJKAndersonLALinFCLauxJP.Completion of advance directives among U.S. consumers. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(1):65–70.
9.
YadavKGablerNBCooneyE, et al. Approximately one in three US adults completes any type of advance directive for end-of-life care. Health Aff. 2017;36(7):1244–51.
10.
SullivanSSDickersonSS.Facing death: a critical analysis of advance care planning in the United States. Adv Nurs Sci. 2016;39(4):320–32.
11.
MoormanSMInoueM.Persistent problems in end-of-life planning among young-and middle-aged American couples. J Gerontol Ser B. 2013;68:97–106.
12.
PollackKMorhaimDWilliamsMA.The public’s perspectives on advance directives: implications for state legislative and regulatory policy. Health Policy. 2010;96(1):57–63.
PaezKZhaoLHwangW.Rising out-of-pocket spending for chronic conditions: a ten-year trend. Health Aff. 2009;28(1):15–25.
15.
TsujiT.Cross-boundary cancer studies at the University of Tokyo: current status and outlook for Japan’s healthcare system: focus on the response to the aging society. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44(suppl 1):i22–7.
16.
NojiriSItohHKasaiT, et al. Comorbidity status in hospitalized elderly in Japan: analysis from national database of health insurance claims and specific health checkups. Sci Rep. 2019;9:20237.
17.
MakinoJFujitaniSTwohigBKrasnicaSOropelloJ.End-of-life considerations in the ICU in Japan: ethical and legal perspectives. J Intens Care. 2014;2(1):9
18.
InoueMHanariKHamanoJGallagherJTamiyaN.Current engagement in advance care planning in Japan and its associated factors. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2019;5:1–7.
19.
YokoyaSKizawaYMaenoT.Practice and perceived importance of advance care planning and difficulties in providing palliative care in geriatric health facilities in Japan: a nationwide survey. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2018;35(3):464–72.
20.
MiyashitaJKohnoAChengSY, et al. Patients’ preferences and factors influencing initial advance care planning discussions’ timing: a cross-cultural mixed-method study. Palliat Med. 2020;34(7):906–16.
21.
NakazawaEYamamotoKOzeki-HayashiRAkabayashiA.Why can’t Japanese people decide? Withdrawal of ventilatory support in end-of-life scenarios and their indecisiveness. Asian Bioethics Rev. 2019;11:343–7.
22.
KizawaYTsunetoSHamanoJNagaokaHMaenoTShimaY.Advance directives and do-not-resuscitate orders among patients with terminal cancer in palliative care units in Japan: a nationwide survey. Am J Hospice Palliat Med. 2012;30(7):664–9.
23.
AkabayashiASlingbyBTKaiI.Perspectives on advance directives in Japanese society: a population-based questionnaire survey. BMC Med Ethics. 2004;4:E5.
24.
HirakawaYChiangCHilaweE.HAyomaA.Content of advance care planning among Japanese elderly people living at home: a qualitative study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;70:162–8.
25.
HawkinsNADittoPHDanksJHSmuckerWD.Micromanaging death: process preferences, values, and goals in end-of-life medical decision making. Gerontologist. 2005;45(1):107–17
26.
CoxKMoghaddamNAlmackKPollockKSeymourJ.Is it recorded in the notes? Documentation of end-of-life care and preferred place to die discussions in the final weeks of life. BMC Palliat Care. 2011;10:18.
27.
TenoJMGruneirASchwartzZNandaAWetleT.Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(2):189–94.
28.
ParkJSongJ.Predictors of agreement with writing advance directives among older Korean adults. J Transcult Nurs. 2016;27(6):574–82.
29.
SilbermannMFinkRMMinSJ, et al. Evaluating palliative care needs in Middle Eastern countries. J Palliat Care. 2015;18(1):18–25.
30.
RheeJJZwarNAKempLA.Uptake and implementation of advance care planning in Australia: findings of key informant reviews. Aust Health Rev. 2012;36(1):98–104.
31.
EnguidanosSAilshireJ.Timing of advance directive completion and relationship to care preferences. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(1):49–56.
32.
DeepKSGriffithCHWilsonJF.Communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experience of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(11):1877–82.
33.
HongMYiEHJohnsonKJAdamekM.E.Facilitators and barriers for advance care planning among ethnic and racial minorities in the U.S.: a systematic review of the current literature. J Immigr Minor Health. 2018;20(5):1277–87.
34.
RahemiZWilliamsCL.Older adults of underrepresented populations and their end-of-life preferences: an integrative review. Adv Nurs Sci. 2016;39(4):E1–29.
35.
de CaprariisPJRuckerBLyonC.Discussing advance care planning and directives in the general population. South Med J. 2017;110(9):563–8.
36.
AldenDLFriendJSchapiraMStiggelboutA.Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision making technology: a theoretical framework for improving the effectiveness of patient decision aids in culturally diverse groups. Soc Sci Med. 2014;105:1–18.
37.
HawleySTMorrisAM.Cultural challenges to engaging patients in shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):18–24.
38.
PerkinsHSGeppertCMAGonzalesACortezJDHazudaHP.Cross-cultural similarities and differences in attitudes about advance care planning. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(1):48–57.
39.
BullockK.The influence of culture on end-of-life decision making. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2011;7(1):83–98.
40.
OhrSJeongSSaulP.Cultural and religious beliefs and values, and their impact on preferences for end-of-life care among four ethnic groups of community dwelling older persons. J Clin Nurs. 2016;26(11–12):1681–1689.
41.
PlusninNPeppingCAKashimaES.The role of close relationships in terror management: a systematic review and research agenda. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018;22(4):307–46.
42.
GreenbergJPyszczynskiTSolomonS.The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: a terror management theory. In: BaumeisterRF, ed. Public Self and Private Self. New York: Springer; 1986.
43.
JohnstoneM.J.Bioethics, cultural differences and the problem of moral disagreement in end-of-life care: a terror management theory. J Med Philos. 2012;37(2):181–200.
44.
GoldenbergJLArndtJ.The implications of death for health: a terror management health model for behavioral health promotion. Psychol Rev. 2008;115(4):1032–53.
45.
StaceyDLégaréFLewisK, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.
46.
DuHJoHJonasEKlacklJAgroskinDHuiEKPMaL. Cultural influences on terror management: independent and interdependent self-esteem as anxiety buffers. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;49(6):1002–11.
47.
HofstedeGH.Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill; 1991.
48.
OysermanDSorensonNReberRChenSX.Connecting and separating mind-sets: culture as situated cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;97(2):217–35.
49.
IshikawaHYamazakiY.How applicable are western models of patient-physician relationship in Asia? Changing patient-physician relationship in contemporary Japan. Int J Jpn Sociol. 2005;14(1):84–93.
50.
ItoMTanidaNTuraleS.Perceptions of Japanese patients and their family about medical treatment decisions. Nurs Health Sci. 2010;12(3):314–31.
51.
LégaréFThompson-LeducP.Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):281–6.
52.
AldenDLFriendJLeeADe VriesMOsawaRChenQ.Culture and medical decision making: health care consumer perspectives in Japan and the U.S. Health Psychol. 2015;34(12):1133–44.
53.
HibbardJHGreeneJ.What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):207–14.
54.
BoernerKCarrDMoormanS.Family relationships and advance care planning: do supportive and critical relations encourage or hinder planning?J Gerontol Ser B. 2013;68(2):246–56.
55.
HindererKALeeMC.Assessing a nurse-led advance directive and advance care planning seminar. Appl Nurs Res. 2014;27(1):84–6.
56.
AldenDLFriendJLeePY, et al. Who decides: me or we? Family involvement in medical decision making in Eastern and Western countries. Med Decis Making. 2018;38(1):14–25.
57.
MoormanSM.Older adults’ preferences for independent or delegated end-of-life medical decision making. J Aging Health. 2011;23(1):135–57.
58.
Kataoka-YahiroMRCondeFAWongRSPageVPellerB.Advance planning among Asian American and Native Hawaiians receiving haemodialysis. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010;16(1):32–40.
59.
FishbeinM.A reasoned action approach to health promotion. Med Decis Making. 2008;28(6):834–44.
60.
BaumanABowlesHRHuhmanM, et al. Testing a hierarchy-of-effects model: pathways from awareness to outcomes in the VERB campaign 2000-2003. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(suppl 6):S249–56.
61.
GoldsteenMHoutepenRProotIMAbu-SaadHHSpreeuwenbergCWiddershovenG.What is a good death? Terminally ill patients dealing with normative expectations around death and dying. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):378–86.
62.
CarrDKhodyakovD.End-of-life health care planning among young-old adults: an assessment of psychosocial influences. J Gerontol Ser B2007;62(2):S135–41.
63.
KeLSHuangXHuWYO’ConnorMLeeS.Experiences and perspectives of older people regarding advance care planning: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Palliat Med. 2017;31(5):394–405.
64.
DobbsDParson EmmettCHammarthADaalemanTP.Religiosity and death attitudes and engagement of advance care planning among chronically ill older adults. Res Aging. 2012;34(2):113–130.
65.
MackJWWeeksAABlockSDPrigersonHG.End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at EOL: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1203–8.
66.
BrownAJShenMJRamondettaLMBodurkaDCGiuntoli IIRLDiaz-MontesT.Does death anxiety affect end-of-life care discussions?Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(8):1521–6.
67.
SimonJPorterfieldPRaffin BouchalSHeylandD.‘Not yet’ and ‘just ask’: barriers and facilitators to advance care planning—a qualitative descriptive study of the perspectives of seriously ill, older patients and their families. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015;5(1):54–62.
68.
UskulAKOysermanD.When the message fits salient cultural-frame, messages feel more persuasive. Psychol Health. 2010;25(3):321–37.
69.
EysenbachG.Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of Internet e-surveys (Cherries). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34.
70.
HoaglinDCIgelwiczB.Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82(400):1147–9.
71.
KimMTasakiKKimILeeH.The influence of social status on communication predispositions. J Asian Pac Commun. 2007;17(2):303–29.
72.
CrossSEBaconPLMorrisML.The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;78(4):791–808.
73.
WongPTPRekerGTGesserG. Death attitude profile-revised: a multidimensional measure of attitudes toward death. In: NeimeyerRA, ed. Death Anxiety Handbook: Research, Instrumentation, and Application. Washington (DC): Taylor & Francis; 1994. p 121–48.
74.
BennettCGrahamIDKristjanssonEKearingSAClayKFO’ConnorAM.Validation of a preparation for decision making scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(1):130–3.
75.
BastianLAMcBrideCMFishL, et al. Evaluating participants’ use of a hormone replacement therapy decision-making intervention. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(3):283–91.
76.
DegnerLFSloanJAVenkateshP.The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29(3):21–43.
77.
GerbingDWHamiltonJG.Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling. 1996;3(1):62–72.
78.
HairJBlackWBabinBAndersonR.Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed.London: Pearson–Prentice Hall; 2010.
79.
ZwickWRVelicerWF.Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bull. 1986;99(3):432–42.
HuLBentlerPM.Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55.
82.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJYPodsakoffN.Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903.
83.
MacKenzieSBPodsakoffPM.Common method bias in marketing: causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. J Retail. 2012;88(4):542–55.
84.
FullerCMSimmeringMJAtincGAtincYBabinBJ.Common method variance detection in business research. J Business Res. 2016;69(8):3192–8.
85.
ByrneBM.Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programing. 3rd ed.New York: Routledge; 2016.
86.
WestSGTaylorABWuW.Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In: HoyleRH, ed. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 2012. p 209–31.
87.
UllmanJBBentlerPM.Structure equation modeling. In: WeinerIB, ed. Handbook of Psychology. 2nd ed.Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2003. p 661–90.
88.
ZhaoXLynchJGChenQ.Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consumer Res. 2010;37(2):197–206.
89.
MitchellSLMorVGozaloPLServadioJLTenoJM.Tube feeding in US nursing home residents with advanced dementia, 2000-2014. JAMA. 2016;316(7):769–70.
90.
MoritaTMiyashitaMShibagakiM, et al. Knowledge and beliefs about end-of-life care and the effects of specialized palliative care: a population-based survey in Japan. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006;31(4):306–16.
91.
KendraAMRubinEBHalpernSD.The problem with physician orders for life-sustaining treatment. JAMA. 2016;315(3):259–60.
92.
SinclairCSmithJToussaintYAuretK.Discussing dying in the diaspora: attitudes towards advance care planning among first generation Dutch and Italian migrants in rural Australia. Soc Sci Med. 2014;101:86–93.
93.
RocqueGBDionne-OdomJNHuangCHS, et al. Implementation and impact of patient lay navigator-led advance care planning conversations. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(4):682–92.
94.
MiyashitaMSanjoMMoritaTHiraiKUchitomiY.Good death in cancer care: a nationwide quantitative study. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(6):1090–7.
95.
HirayamaYOtani Takashi MatsushimaM.Japanese citizens’ attitudes toward end-of-life care and advance directives: a qualitative study for members of medical cooperatives. J Gen Fam Med. 2017;18(6):378–85.
96.
DavisonSN.End-of-life care preferences and needs: perceptions of patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(2):195–204.
97.
OldingMMcMillanSEReevesSSchmittMHPuntilloKKittoS.Patient and family involvement in adult critical and intensive care settings: a scoping review. Health Expect. 2016;19(6):1183–202.
98.
BrownBA.The history of advance directives: a literature review. J Gerontol Nurs. 2003;29(9):4–14.
99.
MatsumuraSBitoSLiuHKahnKFukuharaSKagawa-SingerMWengerN.Acculturation of attitudes toward end-of-life care: a cross-cultural survey of Japanese Americans and Japanese. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(7):531–9.
100.
FrenchEBMccauleyJAragonM, et al. End-of-life medical spending in the last twelve months of life is lower than previously reported. Health Aff. 2017;36(7):1211–7.
ButlerMRatnerEMcCreedyEShippeeNKaneRL.Decision aids for advance care planning: an overview of the state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(6):408–18.
103.
PeabodyJWLiuA.A cross-national comparison of the quality of clinical care using vignettes. Health Policy Plan. 2007;22(5):294–302.
104.
SprengCPOjoIPBurgerNESoodNPeabodyJWDemariaLM.Does stewardship make a difference in the quality of care? Evidence from clinics and pharmacies in Kenya and Ghana. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26(4):388–96.
HuangIANeuhausJMChiongW.Racial and ethnic differences in advance directive possession: role of demographic factors, religious affiliation, and personal health values in a national survey of older adults. J Palliat Med. 2016;19(2):149–56.
107.
BrannonTNMarkusHRTaylorVJ.“Two souls, two thoughts,” two self-schemas: Double consciousness can have positive academic consequences for African Americans. J Pers Soc Sci. 2015;108(4):586–609.
108.
ConstantineMGGainorKAAhluwaliaMKBerkelLA.Independent and interdependent self-construals, individualism, collectivism, and harmony control in African Americans. J Black Psychol. 2003;29(1):87–101.
109.
CollinsJWZouchaRLockhartJSMixerSJ. (2018). Cultural aspects of end-of-life care planning for African Americans: An integrative review of literature. J Transact Nurs. 2018;29(6):578–90.
110.
NathSBHirschmanKBLewisBStrumpfNE.A place called LIFE: exploring the advance care planning of African-American PACE enrollees. Soc Work Health Care. 2008;47(3):277–92.
111.
ShermanDKUskulAKUpdegraffJA.The role of self in response to health communications: a cultural perspective. Self Identity. 2011;10(3):284–94.
112.
MartinDKEmmanuelLLSingerPA.Planning for the end of life. Lancet. 2000;356(9242):1672–6.
113.
TenoJM.Looking beyond the ‘form’ to complex interventions needed to improve end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(9):1170–1.
114.
HughesMTSmithTJ.The growth of palliative care in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:459–75.
