Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation for Older Transplant Candidates: A New Microsimulation Model for Determining Risks and Benefits

Abstract

Background

Under the current US kidney allocation system, older candidates receive a disproportionately small share of deceased donor kidneys despite a reserve of potentially usable kidneys that could shorten their wait times. To consider potential health gains from increasing access to kidneys for these candidates, we developed and calibrated a microsimulation model of the transplantation process and long-term outcomes for older deceased donor kidney transplant candidates.

Methods

We estimated risk equations for transplant outcomes using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), which contains data on all US transplants (2010–2019). A microsimulation model combined these equations to account for competing events. We calibrated the model to key transplant outcomes and used acceptance sampling, retaining the best-fitting 100 parameter sets. We then examined life expectancy gains from allocating kidneys even of lower quality across patient subgroups defined by age and designated race/ethnicity.

Results

The best-fitting 100 parameter sets (among 4,000,000 sampled) enabled our model to closely match key transplant outcomes. The model demonstrated clear survival benefits for those who receive a deceased donor kidney, even a lower quality one, compared with remaining on the waitlist where there is a risk of removal. The expected gain in survival from receiving a lower quality donor kidney was consistent gains across age and race/ethnic subgroups.

Limitations

Limited available data on socioeconomic factors.

Conclusions

Our microsimulation model accurately replicates a range of key kidney transplant outcomes among older candidates and demonstrates that older candidates may derive substantial benefits from transplantation with lower quality kidneys. This model can be used to evaluate policies that have been proposed to address concerns that the current system disincentivizes deceased donor transplants for older patients.

Highlights

The microsimulation model was consistent with the data after calibration and accurately simulated the transplantation process for older deceased donor kidney transplant candidates.

There are clear survival benefits for older transplant candidates who receive deceased donor kidneys, even lower quality ones, compared with remaining on the waitlist.

This model can be used to evaluate policies aimed at increasing transplantation among older candidates.

Keywords

kidney transplantation waitlist posttransplant older candidates microsimulation calibration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Knoll

. Kidney transplantation in the older adult. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61:790–7.

United States Renal Data System. 2020 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States, Chapter 5: Mortality. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2020. Available from: https://adr.usrds.org/2020

Wolfe

Ashby

Milford

, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1725–30.

United States Renal Data System. 2020 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States, Chapter 6: Transplantation. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2020. Available from: https://adr.usrds.org/2020

Aubert

Reese

Audry

, et al. Disparities in acceptance of deceased donor kidneys between the United States and France and estimated effects of increased US acceptance. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:1365–74.

Mehrotra

Gonzalez

Schantz

Yang

Friedewald

Knight

. Patient preferences for waiting time and kidney quality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;17(9):1363–71.

Reese

Harhay

Abt

Levine

Halpern

. New solutions to reduce discard of kidneys donated for transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:973–80.

Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. 5-tier outcome assessment. Available from: https://www.srtr.org/about-the-data/guide-to-using-the-srtr-website/txguidearticles/5-tier-outcome-assessment/ [Accessed February 1, 2021].

Jay

Schold

. Measuring transplant center performance: the goals are not controversial but the methods and consequences can be. Curr Transplant Rep. 2017;4:52–8.

10.

Collett

. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. New York: CRC Press; 2015.

11.

StataCorp. Stata 14. https://www.stata.com/

12.

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/

13.

Delignette-Muller

M-L

Dutang

. fitdistrplus: an R Package for fitting distributions. J Stat Softw. 2015;64:1–34.

14.

Hofert

Kojadinovic

Maechler

Yan

Nešlehová

Morger

. copula: multivariate dependence with copulas, 2020. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=copula

15.

Menzies

Soeteman

Pandya

Kim

. Bayesian methods for calibrating health policy models: a tutorial. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35:613–24.

16.

Briggs

Sculpher

Claxton

. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2011.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.70 MB