Angina Patients' Ratings of Current Health and Health without Angina

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the relationship between chronic stable angina patients' rat ings of two health states (current health and health free of angina), the difference between these two ratings (the "anticipated gain"), and measures of anginal severity and comorbidity. Design. Cross-sectional interviews and questionnaires. Setting. Out patient clinics and medical inpatient service of a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Par ticipants. Patients with chronic stable angina with no prior history of a revascularization procedure attending clinic appointments (n = 44) or electively admitted for cardiac catheterization (n = 11). Measurements. Ratings of current health and health free of angina using a verbal rating scale in which 0 = death and 100 = perfect health, the MOS SF-36, the Index of Coexistent Disease (a validated measure of comorbidity), and a question on the severity of anginal symptoms. Results. Mean (95% Cl) rating of current health was 61.8 (59.2, 64.4) and that of health free of angina was 77.0 (74.5, 79.5). Median anticipated gain between the two health ratings was 10.0 (range 0-80). Correlations between ratings for both health states and subscales of the SF-36 were positive, with some reaching statistical significance. In regression models with rating of current health, rating of life without angina, and anticipated gain as the dependent variables, severity of comorbidity was highly significant in all three, whereas severity of angina was significant only in the current-health rating model. Severity of comorbidity had much greater explanatory power in all three models than did severity of angina. Conclusions. Severity of comorbidity was a better predictor of patients' current health rating, rating for angina-free health, and anticipated gain from relief of angina than was severity of angina. Since patient perceptions of a symptom may be distinct from self- reported symptom severity, treatment-outcome studies should assess patient prefer ences in addition to symptom severity. Comorbidity should also be measured in such studies. Having patients rate current health and symptom-free health may be a useful measure of treatment effectiveness for specific symptoms in clinical trials and patient care, and may help patients and clinicians prioritize multiple health problems. Key words: quality of life; functional status; utility; patient preferences; comorbidity; angina. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:169-177)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cohn PF , Goldberg S. Cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography In: Cohn PF, ed. Diagnosis and Therapy of Coronary Artery Disease. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985 : 220-1.

DeSanctis RW , Hutter AM Jr. Angina pectoris: pathophysiology and medical management In: Eagle KA, Haber E, DeSanctis RW, Austen WG, eds. The Practice of Cardiology. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1989:376.

Schlant RC , Alexander RW Diagnosis and management of chronic ischemic heart disease In: Schlant RC, Alexander RW, eds. The Heart. New York: McGraw Hill, 1994:1072.

Feinstein AR , Josephy BR , Wells CK

Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability

Ann Intern Med. 1986;105:413-20.

Diamond GA , Denton TA

Alternative perspectives on the biased foundations of medical technology assessment

Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:455-64.

Bell MJ , Bombardier C. , Tugwell P.

Measurement of functional status, quality of life, and utility in rheumatoid arthritis

Arthritis Rheum. 1990 ;33:591-601.

Tsevat J. , Goldman L. , Lamas GA, et al.

Functional status versus utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction

Med Care. 1991;29:1153-9.

Revicki DA

Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures

Med Care. 1992;30:MS274-82.

Tsevat J. , Weeks JC , Guadagnoli E., et al.

Using health-related quality-of life information: clinical encounters, clinical trials, and health policy

J Gen Intern Med. 1994;10:576-82.

10.

Guyatt GH , Veldhuyzen Van Zanten SJO , Feeny DH , Patrick DL

Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: a taxonomy and review

Can Med Assoc J. 1989;140:1441-8.

11.

Fowler FJ Jr , Cleary PD , Magaziner J. , Patrick DL , Benjamin KL

Methodological issues in measuring patient-reported outcomes: the agenda of the work group on outcomes assessment

Med Care. 1994;32:JS65-76.

12.

Bombardier C. , Ware J. , Russell IJ , Larson M. , Chalmers A. , Read JL

Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Results of a multicenter trial. Am J Med. 1986;81:565-78.

13.

Katz JN , Phillips CB , Fossel AH , Liang MH

Stability and responsiveness of utility measures

Med Care. 1994;32:183-8.

14.

Patrick DL , Deyo RA

Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life

Med Care. 1989; 27:S217-32.

15.

Guyatt GH , Bombardier C. , Tugwell PX

Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials

Can Med Assoc J. 1986; 134:889-95.

16.

O'Connor GT , Nease RF Jr.

The descriptive epidemiology of health-state values and utilities (editorial)

Med Decis Making. 1993;13:87-8.

17.

Rose GA

The diagnosis of ischaemic heart pain and intermittent claudication in field surveys

Bull WHO. 1962;27: 645-58.

18.

The Medical Outcomes Trust. How to Score the SF-36 Health Survey Boston, MA: The Medical Outcomes Trust, 1993.

19.

Hlatky MA , Boineau RE , Higginbotham MB, et al.

A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index)

Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651-4.

20.

Greenfield S. , Apolone G. Assessment of comorbidity: the Index of Coexistent Disease (ICED). How to use the revised approach of the ICED Booklet available from the authors.

21.

Greenfield S. , Blanco DM , Elashoff RM Ganz PA

Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients

JAMA 1987;257: 2766-70.

22.

Bennett CL , Greenfield S. , Aronow H. , Ganz P. , Vogelzang NJ , Elashoff RM

Patterns of care related to age of men with prostate cancer

Cancer. 1991;67:2633-41.

23.

Greenfield S. , Apolone G. , McNeil BJ , Cleary PD

The importance of co-existent disease in the occurrence of post-operative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement

Med Care. 1993;31:141-54.

24.

Weinstein MC , Fineberg HV Clinical Decision Analysis Philadelphia : W. B. Saunders, 1980:197.

25.

SAS Institute , Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Version 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1990 .

26.

Kleinbaum DG , Kupper LL , Muller KE Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods Boston, MA: PWS-Kent, 1988:126-31, 149-153.

27.

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences New York: Academic Press, 1977:407-53.

28.

Ware JE Jr.

Norm-based interpretation

Medical Outcomes Trust Bulletin. 1994;2(6):3.

29.

Fryback DG , Dasbach EJ , Klein R., et al.

The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-state quality factors

Med Decis Making. 1993;13:89-102.

30.

Churchill DN , Torrance GW , Taylor DW, et al.

Measures of quality of life in end-stage renal disease: the time trade-off approach

Clin Invest Med . 1987;10:14-20.

31.

Krumins PE , Fihn SD , Kent DL

Symptom severity and patients' values in the decision to perform a transurethral resection of the prostate

Med Decis Making. 1988;8:1-8.

32.

Tsevat J. , Goldman L. , Soukup JR, et al.

Stability of time-tradeoff utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction

Med Decis Making. 1993;13:161-5.

33.

Boyd NF , Sutherland HJ , Heasman KZ , Tritchler DL , Cummings BJ

Whose utilities for decision analysis

Med Decis Making. 1990;10:58-67.

34.

Nease RF Jr. , Kneeland T. , O'Connor GT, et al.

Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina

JAMA. 1995;273:1185-90.

35.

Hlatky MA

Patient preference and clinical guidelines

JAMA. 1995;273:1219-20.

36.

Spertus JA , Winder JA , Dewhurst TA , Deyo RA , Fihn SD

The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a valid quality of life measure for patients with coronary artery disease (abstr)

J Gen Int Med. 1994;9(suppl. 2):68.

37.

Kaplan S.

The future of patient input into medical decision making (editorial)

Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:182.