The Relationship between Descriptive and Valuational Quality-of-life Measures in Patients with Intermittent Claudication

Abstract

The study objective was to assess the relationship between descriptive and valuational quality-of-life measures in patients with intermittent claudication. In telephone inter views, 68 patients completed a questionnaire consisting of a descriptive health status measure (RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0), and several valuational measures (stan dard gamble, time tradeoff, rating scale, and McMaster health utility index). All mea sures demonstrated reduced quality of life in the patients. Scores on the RAND-36 dimensions correlated moderately well with the rating scale and McMaster health utility index (R = 0.37-0.67) but less well with the standard gamble and the time tradeoff (R = 0.10-0.46). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that 28% of the variance in the time-tradeoff values and 14% of the variance of the standard-gamble utilities could be explained by the best combination of RAND dimensions. These results suggest that answers to descriptive health-status questions cannot reliably predict standard-gamble utilities or time-tradeoff values. Key words: quality of life; health status; utility assess ment ; peripheral vascular diseases; intermittent claudication. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:217-225)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bergner, M. Quality of life, health status, and clinical research. Med Care. 1989,27 S148-S156.

Bergner, M. , Bobbitt RA , Kressel S. , Pollard WE , Gilson BS , Morris JR

The Sickness Impact Profile development and final revision of a health status measure

Med Care. 1981,19 787-805

Hunt SM , McEwen J. , McKenna SP , Backett EM , Pope C. Subjective health of patients with peripheral vascular disease. Practitioner 1982,226133-6.

Hays RD , Sherbourne CD , Mazel RM

The RAND 36-item health survey 1 0

Health Econ. 1993,2 217-27.

Torrance GW , Furlong W. , Feeny D. , Boyle M.

Multi-attribute preference functions

Pharmacol Econ . 1995,7:503-20

Froberg DG , Kane RL

Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—II

Scaling methods J Clin Epidemiol. 1989, 42.459- 71

Von Neumann J. , Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. 1st ed , 2nd ed , 3rd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994;1947;1953.

Torrance GW

Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal

J Health Econ 1986,5:1-30.

Torrance GW , Thomas WH , Sackett DL A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs . Health Serv Res 1972,7 118-33

10.

Torrance GW , Boyle MH , Horwood SP

Application of multiattribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states

Oper Res . 1982,30:1043-69.

11.

Feeny DH , Torrance GW

Incorporating utility-based quality-of-life assessment measures in clinical trials two examples

Med Care 1989 ,27 S190-S204

12.

Revicki DA Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures . Med Care 1992;30:MS274-MS282

13.

Revicki DA , Kaplan RM

Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life

Qual Life Res 1993,2 477-87

14.

Tsevat J. , Goldman L. , Lamas GA, et al

Functional status versus utilities in survivors of myocardial infarction

Med Care 1991,29 1153-9

15.

Fryback DG , Dasbach ED , Klein R., et al. Health assessment by SF-36, Quality of Well-being Index, and time tradeoffs. predicting one measure from another (abstr). Med Decis Making 1992,12:348.

16.

Albers M. , Ayrton C. , Fratezi C. , De Luccia N. Assessment of quality of life of patients with severe ischemia as a result of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1992,16. 54-9.

17.

Hunt SM , McKenna SP , McEwen J. , Williams J. , Papp E.

The Nottingham Health Profile. subjective health status and medical consultations

Soc Sci Med. 1981a;15A.221-9.

18.

Humphreys W. , Evans F. , Williams T.

Quality of life. is it a practical tool in patients with vascular disease?

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994,23 S34-S36.

19.

Schneider JR , McHorney CA , Malenka DJ , McDaniel MD , Walsh DB , Cronenwett JL

Functional health and well-being in patients with severe atherosclerotic peripheral vascular occlusive disease

Ann Vasc Surg 1993;7 419-28.

20.

Froberg DG , Kane RL

Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—I

Measurement strategies J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;42 345-54.

21.

Drummond MF , Stoddard GL , Torrance GW Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes Oxford, U.K. Oxford University Press, 1987.

22.

Van der Zee K. , Sanderman R. , Heyink J. De psychometrische kwaliteiten van de MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in een Nederlanse populatie. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geneeskunde. 1993;71 183-91

23.

Torrance GW Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socio-Econ Plan Sci. 1976,10 129-36.

24.

Nord E.

Methods for quality adjustment of life years

Soc Sci Med 1992,34 559-69.

25.

Read JL , Quinn RJ , Berwick DM , Fineberg HV , Weinstein MC Preferences for health outcomes. Comparison of assessment methods . Med Decis Making 1984,4 315-29

26.

Boyd NF , Sutherland HJ , Heasman KZ , Tritchler DL , Cummings BJ

Whose utilities for decision analysis?

Med Decis Making 1990,10 58-67

27.

Revicki DA , Weinstein M. , Alderman M., et al. Health Utility and Health Status Outcomes of Antihypertensive Treatment Washington, DC Battelle Medical Technology Assessment and Policy Research Center, 1992.

28.

Bult JR , Bosch JL , Hunink Mgm.

Heterogeneity in the relationship between the standard-gamble utility measure and health-status dimensions

Med Decis Making. 1996,16 226-33.

29.

Llewellyn-Thomas H. , Sutherland HJ , Tibshirani R. , Ciampi A. , Till JE , Boyd NF

Describing health states Methodologic issues in obtaining values for health states

Med Care. 1984,22 543-52.