Long-term Care Residents' Preferences for Health States on the Quality of Well-Being Scale

Abstract

The Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB) quantifies health-related quality of life with a single number that represents community-based preferences for combinations of symptom/problem complexes, mobility, physical activity, and social activity. The aim of this study was to compare preferences of a long-term care population with those of the general population, determine whether preferences vary by the age of the hypo thetical (target) person depicted in the health-state case description, and derive weights for new symptom/problem complexes of particular relevance to frail, older individuals. A sample of 38 female and 12 male long-term care residents with an average age of 86 years was asked to rate health-state scenarios that combined the four health domains of the QWB. This sample rated quality of life 0.10 units lower on average (on a 0-1 scale) than did the general population sample from which the QWB preferences were originally developed. Ratings of the same health state for younger versus older target persons did not differ significantly (all p values > 0.05 for t statistics). Weights derived for 11 new symptom/problem complexes were: disturbed sleep (-0.252), sit-to-stand requires maximal effort (-0.259), lonely (-0.265), walking a short distance causes extreme fatigue (-0.273), agitated (-0.284), hallucinating (-0.355), incontinent (-0.359), unable to control one's behavior (-0.360), urinary catheter (-0.374), restrained in bed or chair (-0.374), and feeding tube through the nose or stomach (-0.402). These new weights increase the relevance of the QWB for cost-utility evaluations of health interventions for long-term care residents. Key words: health state preferences; long-term care; patient preferences; Quality of Well-Being Scale; quality of life; age factors. (Med Decis Making 1996;16:254-261)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Detsky AS , Nagle IG A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 1990,113:147-54

Patrick DL , Starks HE , Cain KC , Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA. Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making. 1994,14:9-18.

Kaplan RM , Bush JW Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychol 1982;1.61-80.

Kaplan RM , Anderson JP The general health policy model. an integrated approach. In: Spilker B (ed). Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials . New York: Raven Press, 1990.

Kaplan RM , Bush JW , Berry CC

Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being

Health Serv Res 1976;11: 478-507

Kaplan RM , DeBon M. , Anderson BF

Effects of number of rating scale points upon utilities in a quality of well-being scale

Med Care 1991,29 1061-4

Hing E. , Sekscenski E. , Strahan G. The National Nursing Home Survey 1985 Summary for the United States National Center for Health Statistics Washington, DC US Government Printing Office, 1989.

Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992 ;112:155-9.

Huber PJ The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions . Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium, 1965. Berkeley, CA. University of California Press, 1967.221-33.

10.

Balaban DJ , Fagi PC , Goldfarb NI, et al. Weights for scoring the quality of well-being instrument among rheumatoid arthritics. Med Care 1986 ,24.973-80

11.

Kaplan RM , Feeny D. , Revicki DA Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures . Quality of Life Res. 1993,2:467-75

12.

Llewellyn-Thomas HA , Sutherland HJ , Thiel EC

Do patients' evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state?

Med Care. 1993;31:1002-12.

13.

Busschbach Jjv , Hessing DJ , De Charro FT

The utility of health at different stages in life: a quantitative approach

Soc Sci Med 1993;37 153-8.

14.

Kaplan RM , Bush JW , Berry CC

Health status index: category rating versus magnitude estimation for measuring levels of well-being

Med Care. 1979;17.501-25.

15.

Kaplan RM , Bush JW , Berry CC The reliability, stability, and generalizability of a health status index American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Social Sciences Section. Washington, DC, 1978.704-9.

16.

Daly E. , Gray A. , Barlow D. , McPherson K. , Roche M. , Vessey M.

Measuring the impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life

Br Med J. 1993,307.836-40.

17.

Nord E.

Toward quality assurance in QALY calculations

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993;9:37-45.