How Should Effectiveness of Risk Communication to Aid Patients' Decisions Be Judged?

Abstract

Risk-communication interventions are associated with benefits at both the individual and the public health level. However, the types of outcomes used to assess the effec tiveness of risk-communication interventions vary greatly. This makes synthesis of the research in systematic review difficult, and limits both the implementation of advances in clinical practice and further research. This article reviews the outcomes used in risk- communication publications, particularly those addressing individual decisions about treatment. From the traditional cognitive and behavioral research outcomes of patient knowledge, risk perception, and compliance, the emphasis has shifted towards more affective outcomes, including satisfaction, assessment of the information provided and the decision-making process, and certainty about whether the best option has been chosen. These affective outcomes may be more specific and sensitive measures for risk-communication research. Further development and validation of measurement scales to address these issues is needed. Key words: risk communication; physician- patient communication; outcome assessment; affective outcomes. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:428-434)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Guadagnoli E. , Ward P.

Patient participation in decision-making

Soc Sci Med 1998,47.329-39

Charles C. , Gafni A. , Whelan T.

Shared decision-making in the medical encounter what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)

Soc Sci Med 1997 ,44 681-92

McWhinney I.A. Textbook of Family Medicine. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Richards T.

Partnership with patients

BMJ 1998 ;316 85-6

Edwards Agk , Barker J. , Bloor M. , et al. A systematic review of risk communication-improving effective clinical practice and research in primary care Cardiff , Wales, U.K University of Wales College of Medicine, Department of General Practice Report to U.K National Health Service Executive, 1998.

Ahl AS , Acree JA , Gipson PS , McDowell RM , Miller L. , Mc-Elvaine MD

Standardisation of nomenclature for animal health risk analysis

Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 1993;12 1045-53

Ng KL , Hamby DM

Fundamentals for establishing a risk communication program

Health Physics 1997,73.473-82.

Kasper J. , Mulley AG , Wennberg JE

Developing shared decision making programs to improve the quality of health care

Quarterly Res Bull. 1992.183-90.

NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Deeks J , Glanville J , Sheldon T (eds) Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness CRD Guidelines for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews Report no. 4 York, U K . University of York, 1996.

10.

Robinson A.

Kit helps physicians, women to work together to weigh HRT risks, benefits

Can Med Assoc J. 1997;156:248-50.

11.

Rothert ML , Holmes-Rovner M. , Rovner D. , et al An educational intervention as decision support for menopausal women Research in Nursing and Health 1997;20-377-87 12. Kelson M.

Consumer Involvement Initiatives in Clinical Audit and Outcomes—A Review of Developments and Issues in the Identification of Good Practice

London , U K.: Department of Health Clinical Outcomes Group , 1995

12.

Llewellyn-Thomas HA Patients' health care decision-making: a framework for descriptive and experimental investigations. Med Decis Making 1995;15-101-6.

13.

Alemi F. , Higley P. Reaction to "talking" computers assessing health risks. Med Care 1995,33 227-33

14.

Shepperd S. , Coulter A. , Farmer A.

Using interactive videos in general practice to inform patients about treatment choices: a pilot study

Fam Pract 1995,1 2-443-7

15.

Hux JE , Naylor CD Communicating the benefits of chronic preventive therapy: does the format of efficacy data determine patients' acceptance of treatment? Med Decis Making. 1995;15 152-7

16.

Vanhaecht Chm , Vanderstichele R. , Debacker G. , Bogaert MG

Impact of patient package inserts on patients' satisfaction, adverse drug-reactions and risk perception—the case of NSAIDs for posttraumatic pain relief

Patient Education & Counseling 1991,17-205-15

17.

O'Connor AM , Pennie RA , Dales RE Framing effects on expectations, decisions, and side-effects experienced—the case of influenza immunization . J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49-1271-6

18.

Whelan TJ , Levine M. , Gafni A. , et al Breast irradiation post-lumpectomy. development and evaluation of a decision instrument. J Clin Oncol 1995 ,13:847-53.

19.

Matthews EJ , Edwards Agk , Barker J. , et al Efficient literature searching in diffuse topics lessons from a systematic review of research on communicating risk to patients in primary care. Health Libraries Review 1999; 16 112-20

20.

Frankland J. , Bloor M. Some issues arising in the systematic analysis of focus group materials. In Barbour R , Kitzinger J (eds) The Use of Focus Groups in Health Research . 1st ed. London, U.K. SAGE Publications, 1997-144-55

21.

Hopper KD , Zajdel M. , Hulse SF , et al Interactive method of informing patients of the risks of intravenous contrast media. Radiology 1994,192.67-71.

22.

Hopper KD , Tyler HN Informed consent for intravascular administration of contrast material: how much is enough? Radiology 1989,171.509-14

23.

Inglis S. , Farnill D. The effects of providing preoperative statistical anaesthetic-risk information . Anaesth Intens Care. 1993,21 799-805

24.

Quaid KA , Faden RR , Vining EP , Freeman JM Informed consent for a prescription drug-impact of disclosed information on patient understanding and medical outcomes. Patient Education & Counseling 1990;15:249-59.

25.

Michie S. , Smith D. , McClennan A. , Marteau TM Patient decision making. an evaluation of two different methods of presenting information about a screening test. Br J Health Psychol. 1997;2:317-26

26.

Aiken LS , West SG , Woodward CK , Reno RR , Reynolds KD Increasing screening mammography in asymptomatic women evaluation of a second-generation, theory-based program. Health Psychol. 1994 ;13.526-38.

27.

Reynolds KD , West SG , Aiken LS Increasing the use of mammography : a pilot program. Health Educ. Q. 1990;17:429-41.

28.

Jacoby A. , Baker G. , Chadwick D. , Johnson A. The impact of counselling with a practical statistical model on patients' decision-making about treatment for epilepsy: findings from a pilot study . Epilepsy Res. 1993;16:207-14.

29.

Fetting JH , Siminoff LA , Piantadosi S. , Abeloff MD , Damron DJ , Sarsfield AM Effect of patients' expectations of benefit with standard breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy on participation in a randomised clinical trial: a clinical vignette study. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:1476-82.

30.

Evans Dgr , Blair V. , Greenhalgh R. , Hopwood P. , Howell A. The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1994 ;70:934-8.

31.

Alexander NE , Ross J. , Sumner W. , Nease RF Jr , Littenberg B. The effect of an educational intervention on the perceived risk of breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:92-7.

32.

Gagnon P. , Massie MJ , Kash KM , et al. Perception of breast-cancer risk and psychological distress in women attending a surveillance program. Psycho-Oncology. 1996;5:259-69.

33.

Paskett ED , Phillips KC , Miller ME Improving compliance among women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears . Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:353-9.

34.

Rothman AJ , Salovey P. , Antone C. , et al. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1993;29:408-33.

35.

Lerman C. , Ross E. , Boyce A. , et al. The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. Am J Public Health. 1992 ;82:729-30.

36.

Palmer CG , Sainfort F. Toward a new conceptualization and operationalization of risk perception within the genetic counseling domain. J Genet Counseling. 1993;2:275-94. 38. Frets PG , Niermeijer MF Reproductive planning after genetic counselling: a perspective from the last decade. Clin Genet. 1990;38:295-306.

37.

Mazur DJ , Hickam DH The effect of physician's explanations on patients' treatment preferences: five-year survival data. Med Decis Making. 1994;14:255-8.

38.

Mazur DJ , Hickam DH Treatment preferences of patients and physicians: influences of summary data when framing effects are controlled. Med Decis Making. 1990;10:2-5.

39.

Llewellyn-Thomas HA , McGreal MJ , Thiel EC Cancer patients' decision making and trial-entry preferences: the effects of "framing" information about short-term toxicity and long-term survival. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:4-12.

40.

Wolf AM , Nasser JF , Schorling JB The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1333-6.

41.

Malenka DJ , Baron JA , Johansen S. , Wahrenberger JW , Ross JM The framing effect of relative and absolute risk. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:543-8.

42.

Working Party of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. From Compliance to Concordance—Achieving Shared Goals in Medicine Taking. London, U.K.: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. 1997.

43.

Phatouros CC , Blake MP How much now to tell? Patients' attitudes to an information sheet prior to angiography and angioplasty. Australasian Radiology. 1995;39:135-9.

44.

Liao L. , Jollis JG , DeLong ER , Peterson ED , Morris KG , Mark DB Impact of an interactive video on decision making of patients with ischaemic heart disease. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:373-6.

45.

Spielberger CD Manual of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory . Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists' Press, 1983

46.

Marteau TM , Bekker H. The development of a six-item short form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31:301-6.

47.

Hayward P. , Chan N. , Kemp R. , Youle S. , David A. Medication self-management: a preliminary report on an intervention to improve medication compliance. J Mental Health. 1995 ;4: 511-7.

48.

O'Connor AM Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25-30.

49.

Davison BJ , Degner LF Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1997;20:187-96.

50.

Street RL , Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:298-306.

51.

Holmes-Rovner M. , Kroll J. , Schmitt N. , et al. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:58-64.

52.

Michie S. , McDonald V. , Marteau TM Genetic counselling: information given, recall and satisfaction. Patient Education & Counseling. 1997;32:101-6.

53.

Entwhistle VA , Sowden AJ , Watt IS Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision-making: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged ? J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998;3:100-7.

54.

Green MJ , Fost N. An interactive computer program for educating and counseling patients about genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. J Cancer Educ. 1997;12:204-8.

55.

Shiloh S. Genetic counselling-a developing area of interest for psychologists . Professional Psychology—Research and Practice. 1996;27:475-86.

56.

Edwards Agk , Matthews EJ , Pill RM , Bloor M. Communication about risk: the responses of primary care professionals to standardizing the language of risk and communication tools. Fam Pract. 1998;15:301-7.

57.

Weinstein ND , Klein WM Resistance of personal risk perceptions to debiasing interventions. Health Psychol. 1995 ;14: 132-40.