Students' perception of the instructor's personality and the evaluation of instruction were found to be strongly related. Students appear to be using a contaminated measure to establish personality and its relationship to the evaluations. The findings do not support the contention that the association reflects a valid measure of instruction. Implications for changing evaluations and the use of the instruments are discussed.
Allport, Gordon W.1955. Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality (Terry lectures). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Ambady, Nalini, and Robert Rosenthal. 1993. Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64 (3): 431–441.
3.
Basow, Susan A.2000. Best and worst professors: Gender patterns in students' choices. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research (Sept.) Retrieved March 31, 2006, from www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2294/is_2000_sept/ai_71118815.
4.
Boice, Robert1992. Countering common misbelieves about student evaluation of teaching. ADE Bulletin101 (Spring): 2–8.
5.
Braskamp, Larry A., and John C. Ory. 1994. Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performances. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Buchanan, Tom2001. Online implementation of an IPIP Five Factor personality inventory. Retrieved from //users.wmin.ac.uk/%7Ebuchant/wwwffii/introduction.html (Last accessed April 6, 2005).
7.
Cashin, William E.1995. Student ratings of teaching: The research revisited. Idea Paper No. 32. Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Division of Continuing Education, Kansas State University.
8.
Centra, John A.1993. Reflective faculty evaluations: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Chonko, Lawrence B.2004. If it walks like a duck...: Concerns about quackery in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education26 (1): 4–16.
10.
Clayson, Dennis E.1989. Halo effects in student evaluations of faculty: A question of validity. In Marketing: Positioning for the 1990s, Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Southern Marketing Association, edited by Robert L. King, 271–275. Charleston, SC: Southern Marketing Association and The Citadel.
11.
Clayson, Dennis E.1999. Students' evaluation of teaching effectiveness: Some implication of stability. Journal of Marketing Education21 (1): 69–75.
12.
Clayson, Dennis E.2004. A test of reciprocity effects in the student evaluation of instructors in marketing classes. Marketing Education Review14 (2): 11–21.
13.
Clayson, Dennis E., Taggart F. Frost, and Mary Jane Sheffet. 2006. Grades and the student evaluation of instruction: A test of the reciprocity effect. Academy of Management Learning & Education5 (1): 52–65.
14.
Clayson, Dennis E., and Debra A. Haley. 1990. Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured?Journal of Marketing Education12 (3): 9–17.
15.
Clayson, Dennis E., and Debra A. Haley. 2005. Marketing models in education: Students as customers, products, or partners. Marketing Education Review15 (1): 1–17.
16.
Digman, John M.1990. Personality structure: An emergence of the five-factor model. The Annual Review of Psychology41: 417–440.
17.
Erdle, Stephen, Harry G. Murray, and J. Philippe Rushton. 1985. Personality, classroom behavior and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology77 (4): 394–407.
18.
Faranda, William T., and Irvine Clark III. 2004. Student observations of outstanding teaching: Implications for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education26 (3): 271–281.
19.
Felder, Richard M.1995. What do they know anyway?Chemical Engineering Education26 (3): 134–135.
20.
Feldman, Kenneth A.1986. The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis. Research in Higher Education24 (2): 139–213.
21.
Foote, David A., Susan K. Harmon, and Donna T. Mayo. 2003. The impacts of instructional style and gender role attitude on students' evaluation of faculty. Marketing Education Review13 (Summer): 9–19.
22.
Grimes, Paul W., Mehan J. Millea, and Thomas W. Woodruff. 2004. Grades—Who's to blame? Student evaluations of teaching and locus of control. Journal of Economic Education35 (2): 129–147.
23.
Hewett, L. J., Garvin Chastain, and Steven Thurber. 1988. Course evaluations: Are students' ratings dictated by first impressions? Paper presented at the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, April 21–22, Snowbird, Utah.
24.
Jang, Kerry L., Robert R. McCrae, Alois Angleitner, Ranier Riemann, and W. John Livesley. 1998. Habitability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: Support for a hierarchical model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74 (6): 1556–1565.
25.
Johnson, Valen E.2003. Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. New York: Springer.
26.
Kulik, James A.2001. Student ratings: Validity, utility, and controversy. New Directions for Instructional Research109 (Spring): 9–25.
27.
Langbein, Laura I.1994. The validity of student evaluations of teaching. PS: Political Science and Politics27 (3): 545–552.
28.
Lantos, Geoffrey P.1997. Motivating students: The attitude of the professor. Marketing Education Review7 (2): 27–38.
Marks, Ronald B.2000. Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value. Journal of Marketing Education22 (2): 108–119.
31.
Marsh, Herbert W., and Dennis Hocevar. 1991. Students' evaluation of teaching effectiveness: The stability of mean rating of the same teachers over a 13-year period. Teaching & Teaching Education7 (1): 303–314.
32.
Marsh, Herbert W., and Lawrence A. Roche. 1997. Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist52 (11): 1187–1197.
33.
Marsh, Herbert W., and Lawrence A. Roche. 1999. Reply upon SET research. American Psychologist54 (7): 517–518.
34.
Marsh, Herbert W., and Lawrence A. Roche. 2000. Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students' evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders?Journal of Educational Psychology92 (1): 202–228.
35.
McCrae, Robert R., and Paul T. Costa Jr. 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist52 (5): 509–516.
36.
Murray, Harry G.1975. Predicting student ratings of college teaching from peer ratings of personality types. Teaching of Psychology2: 66–70.
37.
Murray, Harry G., J. Philippe Rushton, and Sampo V. Paunonen. 1990. Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology82 (2): 250–261.
38.
Naftulin, Donald H., John E. Ware, and Frank A. Donnelly. 1973. The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education48 (July): 630–635.
39.
Orsini, Joseph L.1988. Halo effects in student evaluations of faculty: A case application. Journal of Marketing Education10 (2): 38-45.
40.
Ortinau, David J., and Robert P. Bush. 1987. The propensity of college students to modify course expectations and its impact on course performance information. Journal of Marketing Education9 (Spring): 42–52.
41.
Osgood, Charles E., George J. Suci, and Percy H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The measurment of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
42.
Sauber, Matthew H., and R. Rodman Ludlow. 1988. Student evaluation stability in marketing: The importance of early class meetings. The Journal of Midwest Marketing3 (1): 41–49.
43.
Schlee, Regina P.2005. Social styles of students and professors: Do students' social styles influence their preferences for professors?Journal of Marketing Education27 (2): 130–142.
44.
Sherman, Barbara R., and Robert T. Blackburn. 1975. Personal characteristics and teaching of college faculty. Journal of Educational Psychology67 (1): 124–131.
45.
Simpson, Penny M., and Judy A. Siguaw. 2000. Student evaluations of teaching: An exploratory study of the faculty response. Journal of Marketing Education22 (3): 199–213.
46.
Soldz, Stephen, and George E. Vaillant. 1999. The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality33 (2): 208–232.
47.
Stumpf, Stephen A., and Richard D. Freedman. 1979. Expected grade co variation with student ratings of instruction: Individual versus class effects. Journal of Educational Psychology71 (3): 293–302.
48.
Theall, Michael, and Jennifer Franklin. 2001. Looking for bias in all the wrong places: A search for truth of a witch-hunt in student ratings of instruction?New Directions for Institution Research109 (Spring): 45–56.
49.
Widmeyer, W. Neil, and John M. Loy. 1988. When you're hot, you're hot! Warm-cold effects in first impressions of persons and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology80 (1): 118–121.
50.
Ziegart, Andrea L.2000. The role of personality temperament and student learning in principles of economics: Further evidence. Research in Economic Education31 (4): 307–322.
