The paramount role of scholarship in the modern academic environment is manifest across program accreditation, individual evaluation, and institutional reputation processes. At the microlevel, success in this domain positively influences scholars’performance evaluations and institutions’external reputations. At the macrolevel, research expands and deepens the boundaries of the discipline. It is widely accepted that knowledge development is seminal to the advancement of marketing as a discipline. Accordingly, the academic community is increasingly concerned with potential limits and constraints on knowledge development. This article explores the influence of image management, self-justification, and escalation of commitment within the marketing discipline. A two-phase study using both a broad survey of marketing academicians and in-depth interviews of faculty at two universities indicates that these influences may be constraining creative marketing thought and may limit knowledge development.
Accounting Education Change Board (AECC). 1990. AECC urges priority for teaching in higher education. Issues in Accounting Education5 (2): 330-330.
2.
Adler, Nancy J.1991. International dimensions of organizational behavior. 2nd ed.Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Company.
3.
Anderson, Neil, Jo Silvester, Nicole Cunningham-Snell, and Emma Haddleton. 1999. Relationships between candidate self-monitoring, perceived personality, and selection interview outcomes. Human Relations52 (9): 1115–1131.
4.
Arnould, Eric J., and Melanie Wallendorf. 1994. Market-oriented ethnography: Interpretation building and marketing strategy formation. Journal of Marketing Research. 31 (11): 484–504.
5.
Barnir, Anat, and B. T. Johnson. 1995. Escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: A meta-analytic investigation. Paper presented at the 1995 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, Canada.
6.
Bartusiak, Marcia. 2005. Beyond the big bang. National Geographic207 (5): 110–122.
7.
Bobocel, D. Ramona, and John P. Meyer. 1994. Escalating commitment to a failing course of action: Separating the roles of choice and justification. Journal of Applied Psychology79 (3): 360–363.
8.
Brockner, Joel. 1992. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review17 (1): 39–61.
9.
Burkholder, Jeannette S., and Robert E. Stevens. 1987. Researcher/teacher orientation of doctoral programs for business. Journal of Education for Business63 (Feb): 233–236.
10.
Burnett, John J., Robert D. Amason, and Peggy Cunningham. 1989. What makes marketing academicians successful? An assessment of teaching, publishing and service. Journal of Marketing Education11 (Fall): 7–11.
11.
Carlson, Eugene. 1989. American entrepreneurs: Federal Express wasn’t an overnight success. Wall Street Journal, June 6.
12.
Carnegie Foundation. 2001. The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/Classification.
13.
Cary, M. S., J. Hills, and A. Katcher. 1980. Physiological and personality correlates of escalation. In Too much invested to quit, ed. A. I. Teger, 61–80. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
14.
Cotten, Shelia R., J. Price, S. Keeton, R. P. D. Burton, and J. E. C. Wittekind. 2001. Reflections on the academic job search in Sociology. American Sociologist32 (3): 26-26.
15.
Fagenson-Eland, E.2001. The Caligula phenomenon: Theoretical, but not abusive. Journal of Management Inquiry10 (3): 217-217.
16.
Gilmore, D. C., C. K. Stevens, G. Harrell-Cook, and G. R. Ferris. 1999. Impression management tactics. In The employment interview handbook, edited by R. W. Eder and M. M. Harris, 321–336. London: Sage.
17.
Greenberg, J., T. Pyszczynski, and S. Solomon. 1982. The self-serving attributional bias: Beyond self-presentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology18 (1): 56–67.
18.
Hasselback, J. R.1999. The 1998–1999 Prentice Hall guide to marketing faculty. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
Hastorf, A., D. Schneider, and J. Polefka. 1970. Perception reading. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
Keil, M. 1995. Escalation of commitment in information systems development: A comparison of three theories. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, Canada.
21.
Langevoort, Donald C.1997. Organized illusions: A behavioral theory of why corporations mislead stock market investors (and cause other social harms). University of Pennsylvania Law Review146 (1): 71–98.
22.
Leary, M. R., and R. M. Kowalski. 1990. Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin107 (1): 34–47.
23.
Leong, S. M., and J. N. Sheth. 1994. An empirical study of the scientific styles of marketing academics. European Journal of Marketing. 28 (8/9): 12-12.
24.
Mainous, A. G. III, M. A. Bowman, and J. S. Zoller. 2002. The importance of interpersonal relationship factors in decisions regarding authorship. Family Medicine Journal34 (6): 455–461.
25.
McBane, D. A.1999. AACSB-Accredited colleges of business and marketing departments online. http://mkt.cba.cmich.edu/aacdbmkt/.
26.
McCracken, Grant. 1988. The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
McCullough, Charles D., B. E. Wooten, and J. A. Ryan. 1981. Research and publication programs in collegiate schools of business: A faculty development approach. Journal of Business Education57 (Nov): 46–49.
28.
Schlenker, B. R.1980. Impression management: The self-concept, social identity and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29.
Schultz, Heidi. 2005. Nobel efforts. National Geographic207 (5): 5-5.
30.
Sharma, Dheeraj. 2003. Influence of academic tenure on attitude towards peer evaluation. In Advances in marketing: Proceedings of the Association of Collegiate Marketing Educators, March 8. Houston, TX: Federation of Business Disciplines.
31.
Singer, M. S., and A. E. Singer. 1986. Individual differences and the escalation of commitment paradigm. Journal of Social Psychology126 (2): 197–204.
32.
Singh, Val, and S. Vinnicombe. 2001. Impression management, commitment and gender: Managing others’ good opinions. European Management Journal19 (2): 183-183.
33.
Sinkovics, Rudolf R., and B. B. Schlegelmilch. 2000. Marketing academics in Austria, Germany and Switzerland: Humboldt's ideals give way to performance pressure. Journal of Marketing Management16 (7): 745–759.
34.
Staw, B. M.1980. Rationality and justification in organizational life. In Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, Vol. 2, ed. B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, 45–80. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
35.
Staw, B. M., and F. Fox. 1977. Escalation: Some determinants of commitment to a previously chosen course of action. Human Relations30 (5): 431–450.
36.
Staw, B. M., and J. Ross. 1987a. Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. In Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 9, ed. B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
37.
Staw, B. M., and J. Ross. 1987b. Knowing when to pull the plug. Harvard Business Review65 (2): 68–74.
38.
Stevens, C. K., and A. L. Kristof. 1995. Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology80 (5): 587–606.
39.
Stix, Gary. 2004. The patent clerk's legacy. Scientific American 291 (3): 44–50.
40.
Straughan, Robert D., and Nancy D.Albers-Miller. 2000. Marketing education research: Credit for the advancement of our own profession. Journal of Marketing Management16 (7): 793–812.
41.
Tornell, Aaron, and P. R. Lane. 1999. The voracity effect. American Economic Review89 (1): 22-22.
42.
Whyte, G.1993. Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision-making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes54 (3): 430–455.
