This article examines why and how transformative consumer research (TCR) can become a relevant perspective in doctoral programs. The article draws selectively from studies published in consumer behavior, marketing, and marketing education that theoretically or empirically address this topic. It discusses the meaning and background of TCR together with reasons for its adoption within doctoral programs. It then briefly outlines current practices in doctoral programs in marketing and their main limitations. Finally, a proposal for integrating TCR in doctoral programs is presented, highlighting specific actions to implement it.
American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business International. (2003). Sustaining scholarship in business schools. Report of the doctoral faculty commission to AACSB international's board of directors. St. Louis, MO: Author.
2.
American Marketing Association Task Force. ( 1988). Developing, dissemination, and utilizing marketing knowledge . Journal of Marketing, 52, 1-25.
3.
Anderson, P.F. (1983). Marketing, scientific progress, and scientific method. Journal of Marketing, 47, 18-31.
4.
Arnould, E.J., & Thompson, C.J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research , 31, 868-882.
5.
Bauerly, R.J., & Johnson, D.T. (2005). An evaluation of journals used in doctoral marketing programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 313-329.
6.
Bazerman, M.H. (2001). Consumer research for consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 499-504.
Bernard, H.R. (1999). Editor's note. Field Methods, 11, 3-4.
9.
Berry, L.L. (1989). Becoming a marketing academician: A strategic career planning seminar for doctoral students. Journal of Marketing Education, 11, 2-6.
10.
Braudel, F. (1992). Civilization & capitalism, 15th-18th century, Vol. I. The structure of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Cornwell, T.B. (1998). (Re)designing a Ph.D. consumer behavior seminar . In D. Grewal & C. Pechmann (Eds.), American Marketing Association winter educator's conference proceedings (pp. 358-361). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
12.
Danneels, E., & Lilien, G.L. (1997). Doctoral programs in business-to-business marketing: Status and prospects (Report 94997). University Park: Institute for the Study of Business Markets, Pennsylvania State University .
13.
Firat, A.F. (2001). Consumer research for (the benefit) of consumers . Journal of Research for Consumers, 1. Retrieved August 21, 2004, from http://www.jrconsumers.com/academic_articles/issue_1/Firat.pdf
14.
Holbrook, M.B. (1985). Why business is bad for consumer research: The three bears revisited. In E. C. Hirschman & M. B. Holbrook (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 12, pp. 145-156). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
15.
Jacoby, J. (1976). ACR presidential address—Consumer research: Telling it like it is. In B. B. Anderson (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 3, pp. 1-11). Cincinnati, OH: Association for Consumer Research.
16.
Johnson, M.D. (1998). Customer orientation and market action. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Kernan, J.B. (1979). Presidential address: Consumer research and the public purpose. In W. L. Wilkie (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 6, pp. 1-2). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
18.
Kurtz, D.L., Velliquette, A.M., Garretson, J.A., Dhodapkar, S., & Olson, J. (1997). An evaluation of the marketing theory seminar in Ph.D. programs: Teaching alternatives and future directions. Marketing Education Review, 7(2), 1-15.
19.
Leavitt, H.J. (1993). The business school and the doctorate. Selections, 9, 12-21.
20.
Lutz, R.J. (1989). Presidential address—Positivism, naturalism and pluralism in consumer research: Paradigms in paradise. In T. K. Srull (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 16, pp. 1-8). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
21.
Lutz, R.J. (1997). Adapting the Ph.D. program to ecological imperatives: How to herd cats. In S. T. Cavusgil & N. E. Horn (Eds.), Internationalizing doctoral education in business (pp. 191-199). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
22.
McCracken, G. (1987). The history of consumption: A literature review and consumer guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 10, 139-166.
23.
Mick, D.G. (2004). For consumers: Steps toward transformative consumer research. Retrieved September 30, 2004, from http://www.acrwebsite.org/fop/index.asp?itemID=304
24.
Mick, D.G. (2005). Report on the task force on transformative consumer research at the Association for Consumer Research. Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://www.acrwebsite.org/fop/index.asp?itemID=327
25.
Mick, D.G. (2006). Meaning and mattering through transformative consumer research. In C. Pechmann & L. L. Price (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 33, pp. 1-9). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
26.
Murphy, P.E. (1990). Past FTC participation by marketing academics . In P. E. Murphy & W. L. Wilkie (Eds.), Marketing and advertising regulation. The Federal Trade Commission in the 1990s (pp. 205-215). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
27.
Murray, J.B., & Ozanne, J.L. (1997). A critical-emancipatory sociology of knowledge: Reflections on the social construction of consumer research. Research in Consumer Behavior, 8, 57-92.
28.
Olson, J.C. (1982). Presidential address—1981: Toward a science of consumer research. In A. A. Mitchell (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 9, pp. V-X). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
29.
Petkus, E., Jr. (2000). A theoretical and practical framework for service-learning in marketing: Kolb's experiential learning cycle. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 64-70.
30.
Richins, M.L. (2000, September). Observation and the training of doctoral students. ACR News, 1-7. Retrieved November 5, 2004, from http://www.acrwebsite.org/newsletter/webnews/pdf/Sept00.pdf
31.
Roche, D. (2000). A history of everyday things. The birth of consumption in France, 1600-1800. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Schivelbusch, W. (1992). Tastes of paradise: A social history of spices, stimulants, and intoxicants. New York: Vintage.
33.
Sheth, J.N., & Sisodia, R.S. (2005). A dangerous divergence: Marketing and society . Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 24, 160-162.
34.
Simonson, I., Carmon, Z., Dhar, R., Drolet, A., & Nowlis, S.M. (2001). Consumer research: In search of identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 249-275.
35.
Smith, R.A., & Lux, D.S. (1993). Historical method in consumer research: Developing causal explanations of change. Journal of Consumer Research , 19, 595-610.
36.
Strasser, S. (2003). The alien past: Consumer culture in historical perspective. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 375-393.
Wicker, A.W. (1985). Getting out of our conceptual ruts. Strategies for expanding conceptual frameworks. American Psychologist , 40, 1094-1103.
39.
Wilkie, W.L., & Moore, E.S. (1999). Marketing's contributions to society. Journal of Marketing, 63, 198-218.
40.
Wilkie, W.L., & Moore, E.S. (2006). Macromarketing as a pillar of marketing thought . Journal of Macromarketing, 26, 224-232.
41.
Wilkie, W.L., & Moore-Shay, E.S. (1997). Consortium survey on marketing and society issues: Summary and results. Journal of Macromarketing , 17, 89-95.
