Improvisational comedy emphasizes collaboration over competition. This leads to creative ideas and solutions to problems. By establishing this “improv mind-set” in the business classroom, an instructor may be able to overcome some of the problems associated with the case method (e.g., shy students, dominating students). By doing so, the learning environment of the classroom may be enhanced, and case discussions and learning outcomes may be improved. To frame the issue, the case method and some of its challenges are first discussed. Then the improv mind-set is explained and specific improv guidelines are offered. Finally, the author describes his experiences with trying to establish such a mind-set in a marketing class.
Barnes, L.B., Christensen, C.R., & Hansen, A.J. (1994). Teaching and the case method (3rd ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
2.
Barrett, F.J. (1998). Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organization Science , 9(5), 605-622.
3.
Bastien, D.T., & Hostager, T.J. (1998). Jazz as a process of organizational innovation. Communication Research, 15(5), 582-602.
4.
Ciborra, C.U. (1996). The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organization Science, 7(2), 103-118.
5.
Crossan, M. (1997). Improvise to innovate. Ivey Business Quarterly, 62(1), 36-42.
6.
Crossan, M. (1998). Improvisation in action. Organization Science, 9(5), 593-599.
7.
Cunha, M.P., Cunha J. V., & Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational improvisation: What, when, how, and why. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(3), 299-342.
8.
Dewey, J. (1994/1916). Thinking in education. In L. B. Barnes, C. R. Christensen, & A. J. Hansen (Eds.), Teaching and the case method (3rd ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
9.
Frey, C.J., & Keyes, R.F. (1985). Marketing case instruction at the undergraduate level. Journal of Marketing Education, 7(2), 51-59.
10.
Gibb, S. (2004). Arts-based training in management development: The use of improvisational theatre. The Journal of Management Development, 23(7/8), 741-750.
11.
Gold, M., & Hirshfeld, S. (2005). The behaviors of jazz as a catalyst for strategic renewal and growth. Journal of Business Strategy, 26(5), 40-47.
12.
Gonzalez, G.R., Ingram, T.N., LaForge, R.W., & Leigh, T.W. (2004). Social capital: Building an effective learning environment in marketing classes. Marketing Education Review , 14(2), 1-8.
13.
Greenhalgh, A.M. (2007). Case method teaching as science and art: A metaphoric approach and curricular application. Journal of Management Education, 31(2), 181-194.
14.
Halpern, C., Close, D., & Johnson, K. (1994). Truth in comedy. Colorado Springs : Meriwether.
15.
Harling, K.F., & Akridge, J. (1998). Using the case method of teaching. Agribusiness, 14(1), 1-14.
16.
Harris, R., Harris, K., & Baron, S. (2003). Theatrical experiences: Dramatic script development with employees. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 184-199.
17.
Huffaker, J.S., & West, E. (2005). Enhancing learning in the business classroom: An adventure with improv theater techniques. Journal of Management Education, 29(6), 852-869.
18.
Jennings, D. (2002). Strategic management: An evaluation of the use of three learning methods. The Journal of Management Development , 21(9/10), 655-665.
19.
John, J., Grove, S.J., & Fisk, R.P. (2006). Improvisation in service performances: Lessons from jazz. Managing Service Quality, 16(3), 247-268.
20.
Koppett, K. (2002). Business and the art of improvisation. The British Journal of Administrative Management, 33, 26-27.
21.
McEwen, B.C. (1994). Teaching critical thinking skills in business education. Journal of Education for Business, 70(2), 99-103.
22.
McKnight, B., & Bontis, N. (2002). E-improvisation: Collaborative group-ware technology expands the reach and effectiveness of organizational improvisation. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(4), 219-227.
23.
Miner, A.S., Bassoff, P., & Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 304-337.
24.
Mirvis, P.H. (1998). Practice improvisation. Organization Science, 9(5), 586-592.
25.
Moorman, C., & Miner, A.S. (1998a). The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 1-20.
26.
Moorman, C., & Miner, A.S. (1998b). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 698-723.
27.
Moshavi, D. (2001). "Yes and . . .": Introducing improvisational theatre techniques to the management classroom. Journal of Management Education , 25(4), 437-449.
28.
Quintanilla, C. (1999, June 15). Your career matters: Corporate drones go off to improv class. Wall Street Journal, p. B.1.
29.
Ronstadt, R. (1994). The art of case analysis (3rd ed.). Dana Point, CA: Lord.
30.
Sawyer, R.K. (2000). Improvisation and the creative process: Dewey, Collingwood, and the aesthetics of spontaneity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 58(2), 149-161.
31.
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations . Organization Studies, 25(5), 727-749.
32.
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams . Organization Science, 16(3), 203-224.
33.
Weick, K.E. (1993). Organizational redesign as improvisation. In G. P. Huber & W. H. Glick (Eds.), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance (pp. 349-379). New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
Weick, K.E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9(5), 543-555.
35.
Yorton, T. (2005). Using improv methods to overcome the fear factor . Employment Relations Today, 31(4), 7-13.
