The Ideal of Diversity in Organizations

Abstract

This article offers a psychodynamic exploration of the organizational commitment to diversity. Based on a brief review of organizational rhetoric, two themes are identified. The first is the denial of hatred, which is argued to express the operation of a fantasy of the organization as the peaceable kingdom. This fantasy imagines the organization as a home for those with strong originary group identifications, while refusing to consider how attachment to group identity can foster hate and exclusion. The second theme is the equation of knowledge useful to the organization with life experience connected to group identity. The emphasis in the rhetoric of diversity on the value of experience is linked to a strategy for coping with loss that seeks to make the experience of loss a source of strength. The importance of acknowledging the reality of hate and of coping with, rather than denying, the consequences of loss is emphasized.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aetna. (2001). Aetna diversity statement. Retrieved from www.aetna.com/diversity/

Bion, W. (1994). Learning from experience. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1962)

Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York: Columbia University Press.

Byyny, R. (2001). Diversity and equity: A blueprint for action. Available from www.colorado.edu

City of Denver. (2001). Diversity initiative. Available from www.denvergov.org

Gerstner, L. (2001). IBM's policy on equal opportunity. Available from www.ibm.com

Greenberg, J., & Mitchell, S. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hewlett-Packard. (2002, 2003) Hewlett-Packard diversity statement. Retrieved from www.hp.com/hpinfo/abouthp/diversity/htm

Jackson, J. (1989) Keep hope alive: Jesse Jackson's 1988 presidential campaign. Boston: South End.

10.

Kets de Vries, M., & Miller, D. (1984). The neurotic organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Kristeva, J. (1993). Nations without nationalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

12.

Levine, D. (1999). Identity, the group, and the social construction of reality. Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society, 4, 81-91.

13.

Levine, D. (2000). Closed systems, social symptoms, and social change. Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society, 5, 28-40.

14.

Lucent Technologies. (2002). Diversity statement. Available from www.lucent.com/work/culture.html

15.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2002). Diversity statement. Retrieved from www.pwcglobal.com/us/eng/careers/diversity/index.html

16.

Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

17.

Sannwald, W. (1999). Managing diversity: The city of San Diego experience. Library Administration & Management, 13, 18-22.

18.

Schwartz, H. (1990). Narcissistic process and corporate decay: The theory of the organizational ideal. New York: New York University Press.

19.

Stein, H. (1994). The dream of culture: Essays on culture's elusiveness. New York: Psyche Press.

20.

Thomas, R. (1991-92). The concept of managing difference. The Bureaucrat: The Journal of Public Managers, 19-22.

21.

United States Coast Guard. (2001). Diversity training module. Retrieved from www.uscg.mil/hq/g-w/gwt/g-wtl/divers/index.htm

22.

University of Colorado. (2002). Campus diversity plan. Retrieved from www.colorado.edu/cu-diversity/

23.

Waddell, M. (1998). Inside lives: Psychoanalysis and the growth of the personality. London: Routledge.

24.

Winnicott, D. (1965). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. In The maturational process and the facilitating environment (pp. 37-55). Madison, CT: International Universities Press. (Original work published in 1960)