As the nonprofit sector grows and its relationship with the public sector deepens, nonprofit managers are working harder at developing donated financial and human resources. Although much research on nonprofit fund-raising has looked at who donates and which fund-raising strategies are most effective, no work to date has connected the two concepts; to illuminate which fund-raising strategies work with which donors. Using interview data conducted with nonprofit fund-raising executives and survey data on Atlanta residents, the authors estimate the impacts of sociodemographic and economic characteristics on the success of different donor development approaches. After constructing conceptual and empirical models, the authors’ data analysis allows them to develop a set of management implications that will assist nonprofit managers in crafting development strategies for the organizations they operate.
American Association of Fund-Raising Counsel. (1999). Giving USA 1999. New York: Author.
2.
Andreoni, J., Brown, E., & Rischall, I. (2003). Charitable giving by married couples: Who decides and why does it matter?Journal of Human Resources, 38(1), 111-133.
3.
Brooks, A. C. (2000). Is there a dark side to government support for nonprofits?Public Administration Review, 60(3), 211-218.
4.
Brooks, A. C. (2002). Welfare receipt and private charity. Public Budgeting and Finance, 22(3), 100-113.
5.
Brooks, A. C. (2004a). The effects of public policy on private charity. Administration & Society, 36(2), 166-185.
6.
Brooks, A. C. (2004b). In search of true public arts support. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(2), 88-100.
7.
Brooks, A. C., & Lewis, G. B. (2001). Giving, volunteering, and mistrusting government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(4), 765-769.
8.
Brown, E. (1999). Patterns and purposes of philanthropic giving. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 212-230). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
Chang, C. F., Okunade, A. A., & Kumar, N. (1999). Motives behind charitable bequests. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 6(4), 69-85.
10.
Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1995, Summer). Motivations for volunteering and giving: A functional approach. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 8, 111-124.
11.
Clotfelter, C. T. (1985). Federal tax policy and charitable giving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Clotfelter, C. T. (1997). The economics of giving. In J. W. Barry & B. V. Manno (Eds.), Giving better, giving smarter: Working papers of the National Commission on Philanthropy and Civic Renewal. Washington, DC: National Commission on Philanthropy and Civic Renewal.
13.
Clotfelter, C. T., & Steuerle, C. E. (1981). Charitable contributions. In H. Aaron & J. Pechman (Eds.), How taxes affect economic behavior (pp. 403-437). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14.
Cortes, M. (1995, Summer). Three strategic questions about Latino philanthropy. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 8, 23-40.
15.
Dee, J. R., & Henkin, A. B. (1997). Communication and donor relations: A social skills perspective. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 8(2), 107-119.
16.
Duncan, B. (1999). Modeling charitable contributions of time and money. Journal of Public Economics, 72, 213-242.
17.
Fairfax, J. E. (1995, Summer). Black philanthropy: Its heritage and its future. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 8, 9-22.
18.
Feld, A., O’Hare, M., & Schuster, J. M. (1983). Patrons despite themselves: Taxpayers and arts policy. New York: New York University Press.
19.
Feldstein, M., & Clotfelter, C. T. (1976). Tax incentives and charitable contributions in the United States: A microeconomic analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 5, 1-26.
20.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Gronbjerg, K. A., & Salamon, L. M. (2002). Devolution, marketization, and the changing shape of government-nonprofit relations. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 447-470). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
22.
Heidrich, K. W. (1990). Volunteers’ life-styles: Market segmentation based on volunteers’ role choices. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(1), 21-31.
23.
Hodgkinson, V. A., & Weitzman, M. S. (1996). Giving and volunteering in the United States: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
24.
Hodgkinson, V. A., & Weitzman, M. S. (1998). Responding to factual errors present in the Schervish and Havens articles, “Embarking on a republic of benevolence? New survey findings on charitable giving,” and other comments. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(4), 522-528.
25.
Hoge, D. R. (1995, Summer). Explanations for current levels of religious giving. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 7, 51-70.
26.
Iannacone, L. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465-1495.
27.
Independent Sector. (1999). Giving and volunteering in the United States 1999, Washington, DC: Author.
28.
Jackson, F. J., Bachmeier, M. D., Wood, J. R., & Craft, E. A. (1995). Volunteering and charitable giving: Do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 59-78.
29.
Jencks, C. (1987). Who gives to what? In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector (pp. 321-339). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcesbook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Morgan, J. N., Dye, R. F., & Hybels, J. H. (1977). Results from two national surveys of philanthropic activity. In Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs, Research papers: Vol. 1. History, trends, and current magnitudes (pp. pg. nos.?). Washington, DC: Department of the Treasury.
32.
Morino, M., & Shore, B. (2004, June). High-engagement philanthropy: A bridge to a more effective social sector. Reston, VA: Venture Philanthropy Partners and Community Wealth Ventures. Retrieved from http://vppartners.org/investors/learning/enews/issues/jul04.html
Nathan, R. P. (1996). The “nonprofitization movement” as a form of devolution. In D. F. Burlingame, W. A. Diaz, W. F. Ilchman, & Associates (Eds.), Capacity for change? The nonprofit world in the age of devolution (pp. 23-56). Indianapolis: Indiana University Center on Philanthropy.
35.
Ostrower, F. (1995). Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Prince, R. A., File, K. M., & Gillespie, J. E. (1993). Philanthropic styles. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 3(3), 255-268.
37.
Randolph, W. C. (1995). Dynamic income, progressive taxes, and the timing of charitable contributions. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 709-738.
38.
Ryan, W. P. (2001). Nonprofit capital: A review of problems and strategies. New York: Rockefeller Foundation and Fannie Mae Foundation.
39.
Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K., List, R., Toepler, S., & Sokolowski, S. J. (1999). Global civil society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
40.
Schervish, P. G. (1997a). Inclination, obligation, and association: What we know and what we need to learn about donor motivation. In D. F. Burlingame(Ed.), Critical issues in fundraising (pp.110-138). New York: John Wiley.
41.
Schervish, P. G. (1997b, Summer). Major donors, major motives: The people and purposes behind major gifts. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 16, 85-116.
42.
Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (1995). Do the poor pay more: Is the u-shaped curve correct?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 79-90.
43.
Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (1998). Money and magnanimity: New findings on the distribution of income, wealth, and philanthropy. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 8(4), 421-434.
44.
Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (2001). Wealth and the commonwealth: New findings on wherewithal and philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(1), 5-25.
45.
Schneider, J. C. (1996). Philanthropic styles in the United States: Toward a theory of regional differences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(2), 190-210.
46.
Steinberg, R. (1990). Taxes and giving: New findings. Voluntas, 1, 61-79.
47.
Van Slyke, D. M. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 296-315.
48.
Van Til, J. (1990). Introduction: Defining philanthropy: Toward guidelines for effective philanthropic practice. In J. Van Til & Associates, Critical issues in American philanthropy: Strengthening theory and practice (pp. PG. NOS.?). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49.
Wolff, E. (1999). The economy and philanthropy. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 212-230). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
50.
Wolpert, J. (1995, Summer). Giving and region: Generous and stingy communities. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 7, 11-30.
