Theory offers a vast quantity of normative prescriptions concerning citizen participation in budget decisions. Yet cities struggle with this activity and report unsatisfactory outcomes. Why does this occur? It may be because, similar to the parable of the blind men describing the different parts of the camel, the extant literature suggests so many variables but does not integrate what we know to see the whole picture, nor does it eliminate variables having little explanatory value and there has been limited systematic testing of hypotheses in this area. To manage the complexity caused by a multiplicity of variables, the authors test a causal model with four different factors (structure, participants, process, and mechanisms) thought to influence effective citizen participation outcomes on cases of two midwestern cities. In this limited application, the model shows promise for predictive validity.
Berman, E.
(1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 105-112.
2.
Boschken, H. L.
(1992). Analyzing performance skewness in public agencies: The case of urban mass transit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(3), 265-288.
3.
Boschken, H. L.
(1994). Organizational performance and multiple constituencies. Public Administration Review, 54(3), 308-312.
4.
Bryson, J. M.
(1995). Strategic planning for public and non-profit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
City of Burlington
. (2001a). Procedures and suggestions for speaking at regular meetings of the Burlington City Council. Burlington, IA: Author.
6.
City of Burlington
. (2001b). The Citizen Budget Education Committee. Burlington, IA: Author.
7.
Clarkson, M. B. E.
(1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
8.
Ebdon, C.
(2000). The relationship between citizen involvement in the budget process and city structure and culture. Public Productivity and Management Review, 23(3), 383-393.
9.
Ebdon, C.
(2002). Beyond the public hearing: Citizen participation in the local government budget process. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 14(2), 273-294.
10.
Franklin, A. L.
(2001). Involving stakeholders in organizational processes. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(4), 385-403.
11.
Franklin, A. L.
, & Carberry-George, B. (1999). Analyzing how local governments establish service priorities, Public Budgeting & Finance, 19(3), 31-46.
12.
Franklin, A. L.
, & Ebdon, C. (2004). Aligning priorities in local budgeting processes. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 16(2), 210-227.
13.
Frisby, M.
, & Bowman, M. (1996). What we have here is a failure to communicate. Public Management, 78(2), A1-A5.
14.
Glaser, M. A.
, & Denhardt, R. B. (1999). When citizen expectations conflict with budgeting reality: Discontinuity between the public’s demand for services and its willingness to pay taxes. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 11(2), 276-310.
15.
Glaser, M. A.
, & Hildreth, W. B. (1996). A profile of discontinuity between citizen demand and willingness to pay taxes: Comprehensive planning for park and recreation investment. Public Budgeting and Finance, 16(4), 96-113.
16.
Gurwitt, R.
(1992, December). A government that runs on citizen power. Governing, 6, 48-54.
17.
Huddleston, M. W.
(2000). The public administration workbook (4th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
18.
International City/County Management Association (ICMA)
. (1999). ICMA declaration of ideals. Retrieved October 8, 2002, from http://www.icma.org/go.cfm?cid=1&gid=2&sid=4&did=7
19.
Irvin, R. A.
, & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?Public Administration Review, 61(4), 55-65.
20.
Kathlene, L.
, & Martin, J. (1991). Enhancingcitizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives and policy formation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(1), 46-63.
21.
King, C. S.
, Feltey, K., & Susel, B. O. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 317-326.
22.
King, G.
, Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Kuhn, T. S.
(1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Kweit, M. G.
, & Kweit, R. W. (1981). Implementing citizen participation in bureaucratic society. New York: Praeger.
25.
Long, E.
, & Franklin, A. L. (2004). The paradox of GPRA implementation: Top-down direction for bottom-up implementation. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 309-319.
26.
Mark, M. M.
, & Shotland, R. L. (1985). Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgements. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 605-626.
27.
Mitroff, I.
(1983). Stakeholders of the organizational mind: Toward a new view of organizational policy making. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Nalbandian, J.
(1991). Professionalism in local government: Transition in the roles, responsibilities and value of city managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA)
. (1999). A government to trust and respect. Washington, DC. Retrieved October 8, 2002, from http://www.napawash.org/
30.
O’Toole, D. E.
, Marshall, J., & Grewe, T. (1996). Current local government budgeting practices. Government Finance Review, 12(6) 25-59.
31.
Popper, K.
(2002). Logik der Forschung [The logic of scientific discovery] (15th ed.). London: Routledge Classics. (Original work published 1934)
32.
Ragin, C. C.
(1987). The comparative method; Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Roberts, N.
(1997). Public deliberation: An alternative approach to crafting policy and setting direction. Public Administration Review, 57(2), 124-132.
34.
Saltzstein, A. L.
(2003). Governing America’s urban areas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
35.
Selznick, P.
(1949). TVA and the grass roots. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
36.
Senge, P. M.
(1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
37.
Shadish, W. R.
, Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1990). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
Simonsen, W.
, & Robbins, M. D. (2000). Citizen participation in resource allocation. Boulder, CO: Westview.
39.
Stone, D.
(1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
40.
Thomas, J. C.
(1995). Public participation in public decisions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Van Evera, S.
(1997). Guide to methods for students of political science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
Webb, K.
, & Hatry, H. P. (1973). Obtaining citizen feedback: The application of citizen surveys to local government. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
43.
Wilson, L. A., II.
(1983). Preference revelation and public policy: Making sense of citizen survey data, Public Administration Review, 43(4), 335-342.
