The proper balance between governmental secrecy and open government is at the forefront of contemporary public debate. Citizens have different degrees of interest in and demand for governmental transparency. Using data from a national online survey of more than 1,800 respondents, we develop several indices to measure citizens' demand for transparency at the local level and explore its correlates. We also examine the correlates of citizens' reported requests for information from local government. The data and analysis suggest that there are several dimensions to the public's demand for transparency, including fiscal, safety, and government concerns, and principled openness. Age, political ideology, confidence in government leaders, frequency of contacting government, and especially the perception that there is currently not enough access to government appear to drive the public's demand for transparency, although determinants differ for each dimension. Some, although not all, of these factors also predict citizens' actual requests for government information.
Alt, J.E., Lassen, D.D., & Skilling, D. (2002). Fiscal transparency, gubernatorial popularity, and the scale of government: Evidence from the states. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 2, 230-250.
2.
American FactFinder. (2000). Census quick tables. Retrieved March 12, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/.
3.
Banisar, D. (2004). The www.freedominfo.org global survey: Freedom of information and access to government record laws around the world. Retrieved August 18, 2005, from http://www.freedominfo.org/survey.htm
Bobo, L., & Gilliam, F.D. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84, 377-393.
6.
Committee on Government Reform—Minority Staff. (2004). Secrecy in the Bush administration. Report prepared for Rep. Henry A. Waxman. Washington, DC: House of Representatives, Special Investigations Division.
7.
Cooper, P.J. (1986). The Supreme Court, the First Amendment, and freedom of information. Public Administration Review, 46, 622-628.
8.
Cornyn, J. (2005). FOI and the consent of the governed. Speech for National FOI Day Conference. Washington, DC: First Amendment Center. Retrieved April 1, 2006, from http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/commentary.aspx?id=14993
9.
Cross, H.L. (1953). The people's right to know: Legal access to public records and proceedings. Morningside Heights, NY: ColumbiaUniversity Press.
10.
Cullier, D. (2006). Access attitudes: measuring and conceptualizing support for press access to government records. Doctoral dissertation, Edward R. Murrow School of Communication, Washington State University.
11.
Denhardt, J.V., & Denhardt, R.B. (2003). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
12.
Feinberg, L. (1997). Open government and freedom of information: Fishbowl accountability. In P. J. Cooper & C. A. Newland (Eds.), Handbook of public law and administration (pp. 376-385). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
13.
Feinberg, L.E. (2004). FOIA, federal information policy, and information availability in a post 9/11 world. Government Information Quarterly, 21, 439-460.
14.
Government Accountability Office. (2005). Information management: Implementing the freedom of information act. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
Gormley, W., Jr., & Balla, S.J. (2003). Bureaucracy and democracy: Accountability and performance. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
16.
Heald, D. (2003). Fiscal transparency: Concepts, measurement and UK practice. Public Administration, 81, 732-759.
17.
Hoffman, D.N. (1981). Governmental secrecy and the founding fathers: A study of constitutional controls. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
18.
Howell, S.E., & Fagan, D. (1988). Race and trust in government: Testing the political reality model. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 343-350.
19.
Ipsos-Public Affairs. (2005). “ First Amendment Center and the American Society for Newspaper Editors Poll .” Retrieved April 1, 2006, from www.freedomforum.org/publications/first/foi/foiinthedigitalage.pdf
20.
Jennings, M.K. (1983). Gender roles and inequalities in political participation: Results from an eight-nation study. Western Political Quarterly , 36, 364-385.
21.
Light, P.C. (1997). The tides of reform: Making government work 1945-1995 . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Markman, S. (1988). Excerpts from justice testimony [Electronic Version] . FOIA Update, IX. Retrieved August 18, 2005, from http://www.usdoj.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_IX_3/ix_3page2.htm
23.
Marlowe, J. (2004). Part of the solution or cogs in the system? The origins and consequences of trust in public administrators. Public Integrity, 9(2), 93-113.
24.
Moynihan, D.P. (1998). Secrecy: The American experience. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Nye, J. J., Zelikow, P. D., & King, D. C. (Eds.). (1997). Why people don't trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Oliver, J.E. (2001). Democracy in suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Paulson, K. (2002, September). Too free? American Journal Review. Retrieved January 19, 2005, from www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=2621
28.
Piotrowski, S.J., & Rosenbloom, D.H. (2002). Nonmission-based values in results oriented public management: The case of freedom of information . Public Administration Review, 62, 643-657.
29.
Prados, J., & M.P. Porter (2004). Inside the pentagon papers. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
30.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31.
Radin, B.A. (2002). The accountable juggler: The art of leadership in a federal agency. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
32.
Redford, E.S. (1969). Democracy in the administrative state. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Relyea, H.C. (1979). The Freedom of Information Act a decade later . Public Administration Review, 39, 310-311.
34.
Roberts, A.S. (2000). Less government, more secrecy: Reinvention and the weakening of information law. Public Administration Review , 60, 308-320.
35.
Roberts, A.S. (2004, Spring). National security and open government. GeorgetownPublic Policy Review, 9(2), 69-86.
36.
Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.). (1999). Measures of political attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37.
Romzek, B.S., & Dubnick, M.J. (1998). Accountability. In J. M. Sharfriz (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration. Boulder, CO: Westview.
38.
Rossi, P.H., & Weber E. (1996). The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from national surveys. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 1-36.
39.
Rourke, F.E. (1960). Administrative secrecy: A congressional dilemma . American Political Science Review, 54, 684-694.
40.
Stiglitz, J.E. (1999). On liberty, the right to know, and public discourse: The role of transparency in public life. Oxford: OxfordAmnesty Lecture.
41.
Van Ryzin, G., Muzzio, D., & Immerwahr, S. (2004). Explaining the race gap in satisfaction with urban services. Urban Affairs Review, 39, 613-632.
42.
Verba, S., & Nie, N. (2004). Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
