Many public functions originally performed primarily by state actors now routinely rest not with the responsible government agencies but with a host of nongovernmental, third-party surrogates or proxies. There has also been an increase in partnerships and collaboration between nonprofits, corporations, and governments, necessitating new skills and competencies for public and nonprofit leaders alike. The authors summarize the literature on these issues and identify important areas of agreement. They then report the results of a research project intended to help public and nonprofit managers identify characteristics of nonprofit organizations that are most likely to signal the existence of an effective and accountable organization.
Abzug, R., & Watson, M.R. (2004). Organizational capacity: Issues and concerns regarding performance standards. In R. V. Anglin (Ed.), Building the organizations that build communities: Strengthening the capacity of faith and community-based development organizations (pp. 275-284). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.
2.
Anglin, R. V. (Ed.). (2004). Building the organizations that build communities: Strengthening the capacity of faith- and community-based development organizations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.
3.
Austin, J.E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 69-97.
4.
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. ( 1999). Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR, 48(RR11), 1-40.
5.
Dannin, E. (2001). To market, to market: Caveat emptor. In I. Ritchie & S. S. Kennedy (Eds.), To market, to market: Reinventing Indianapolis (pp. 175-199). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
6.
DiMaggio, P., & Anheier, H. (1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors . Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 137-159.
7.
Foster, M.K., & Meinhard, A.G. (2002). A regression model explaining predisposition to collaborate. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 549-564.
8.
Gilmour, R.S., & Jensen, L.S. (1998). Reinventing government accountability: Public functions, privatization, and the meaning of "state action." Public Administration Review, 58, 247-258.
9.
Grønbjerg, K. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in human services and community development organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Hall, L.M. (2008). Ties that bind: The impact of religious affiliation on goals and linkages in nonprofit organizations. Critical Sociology34(1).
11.
Hall, M.F. (1995). Poor people's social movement organizations: The goal is to win. Westport, CT: Praeger .
12.
Herman, R.D., & Renz, D. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 107-126.
13.
Jensen, L., & Kennedy, S.S. (2005). Government ethics and constitutional accountability . In G. G. Frederickson & R. K. Ghere (Eds.), Ethics in public management (pp. 220-242). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
14.
Kease, R., Mandell, M.P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64, 363-371.
15.
Kennedy, S.S. (2001). When is public private? State action, privatization and public-private partnerships. George Mason Civil Rights Law Review, 11(2), 203-223.
Mandell, M.P. (1999). The impact of collaborative efforts: Changing the face of public policy through networks and network structures. Policy Studies Review, 16(1), 4-17.
21.
Mandell, M.P. (2000a). A revised look at management in network structures . International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior , 3(1&2), 185-209.
22.
Mandell, M.P. (2000b). From networks to network structures: Collaborative strategies. In J. Rabin, G. J. Miller, & W. B. Hildreth (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (2nd ed., pp. 371-386). New York: Marcel Dekker.
23.
McNamara, C. (1999). Basic guide to program evaluation. Retrieved October 7, 2004, from http://www.managementhelp.org/evaluatn/fnl_eval.htm
24.
Metzger, G.E. (2003). Privatization as delegation. Columbia Law Review, 103, 1367-1502.
25.
Minow, M. (2002). Partners, not rivals: Privatization and the public good. Boston: Beacon Press.
26.
Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Seitz, V., & Grieve, M. (2004). Participatory outcomes-based evaluation: The success measures process and data system. In R. V. Anglin (Ed.), Building the organizations that build communities: Strengthening the capacity of faith and community-based development organizations (pp. 285-292). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.
28.
Smith, S.R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Steckel, R., & Lehman, J. (1997). In search of America's best nonprofits. Denver, CO: Jossey-Bass.
