Prior research has offered significant insight into the politics, substance, and implications of administrative reform movements in the United States. However, a coherent theory for understanding the drivers, interactions, and implications of the evolution of U.S. administrative reform movements over time is still lacking. This interpretative essay begins to address this gap by reviewing prior scholarship assessing administrative reform movements in the United States, by using the insights of scholarship in American Political Development (APD) to illustrate its applicability to the evolution of administrative reform movements in the United States, and by teasing from APD literature an integrated process theory that incorporates the insights of prior public administration research on this topic. In doing so, it discerns the sources and implications of the repeated privileging, reflexivity, and amplifying effects of American exceptionalist, corporatist, and associationalist values on the trajectory and substance of administrative reform movements in this nation.
Adams, G.B., & Balfour, D.L. (2004). Unmasking administrative evil (Rev. ed.). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
2.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
Appleby, J. (2000). Inheriting the revolution: The first generation of Americans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Barber, W.J. (1985). From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the economists, and American economic policy, 1921-1933. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
5.
Barzelay, M. (2001). The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Berry, J.M. (1999). The new liberalism: The rising power of citizen groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
7.
Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8.
Brands, H.W. (2001). The strange death of American liberalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Burner, D. (1978). Herbert Hoover: A public life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
10.
Campbell, A.L. (2003). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Carpenter, D.P. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state: Power, politics, and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Clemens, E.S. (2006). Lineages of the Rube Goldberg state: Building and blurring public programs, 1900-1940. In I. Shapiro, S. Skowronek, & D. Galvin (Eds.), Rethinking political institutions: The art of the state (pp. 187-215). New York: New York University Press.
14.
Clements, K.A. (2000). Hoover, conservation, and consumerism: Engineering the good life. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
15.
DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
16.
Durant, R.F. (2000). Whither the neoadministrative state? Toward a polity-centered theory of administrative reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 79-109.
17.
Ellis, J.J. (2004). His Excellency: George Washington. New York: Vintage Books.
18.
Frederickson, H.G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Gaus, J. (1947). Reflections on public administration. Birmingham: University of Alabama Press.
20.
Hacker, J.S., & Pierson, P. (2007). Tax politics and the struggle over activist government . In P. Pierson & T. Skocpol (Eds.), The transformation of American politics: Activist government and the rise of conservatism (pp. 256-280). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Hart, D.M. (1994, October/November). Herbert Hoover's last laugh: The enduring significance of the "associative state" in the United States . Paper presented at the Society for the History of Technology meeting, Lowell, MA, and the Northeastern Political Science Association meeting, Providence, RI. (Published 1998. Journal of Policy History, 10(3), 419-444)
22.
Hawley, E.W. (1974). Herbert Hoover, the Commerce Secretariat, and the vision of an "associative state," 1921-1928. Journal of American History, 61(1), 116-140.
23.
Hawley, E. W. (Ed.) (1981). Herbert Hoover as Secretary of Commerce: Studies in New Era thought and practice . Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
24.
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Hofstadter, R. (1989). The American political tradition: And the men who made it. New York: Vintage Books .
26.
Howe, D.W. (1979). The political culture of the American Whigs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Ingram, H., Schneider, A., & DeLeon, P. (2007). Social construction and policy design. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 93-126). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
28.
Jones, B.D., & Baumgartner, F.R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Kaufman, H. (1969). Administrative decentralization and political power. Public Administration Review, 29(1), 3-15.
30.
Kennedy, D.M. (2005). Freedom from fear: The American people in depression and war, 1929-1945. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
Klyza, C.M., & Sousa, D. (2008). American environmental policy, 1990-2006: Beyond gridlock. Cambridge: MIT Press.
32.
Kolko, G. (1963). The triumph of conservatism: A reinterpretation of American history, 1900-1916. New York: Free Press.
33.
Koppell, J.G.S. (2003). The politics of quasi-government: Hybrid organizations and the dynamics of bureaucratic control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Koppell, J.G.S. (2006). Reform in lieu of change: Tastes great, less filling . Public Administration Review, 66(1), 20-23.
35.
Kraft, M., & Kamieniecki, S. (2007). Business and environmental policy: Corporate interests in the American political system. Cambridge: MIT Press.
36.
Landler, M., & Andrews, E. (2008, October 3). For Treasury Dept., now comes the hard part of bailout. The New York Times. Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/business/economy/04plan.html
37.
Light, P.C. (1997). The tides of reform: Making government work, 1945-1995 . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
Light, P.C. (1999). The true size of government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
39.
Light, P.C. (2006). The tides of reform revisited: Patterns in making government work, 1945-2002. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 6-19.
40.
Lindblom, C.E. (1977). Politics and markets: The world's political economic systems. New York: Basic Books.
41.
Lipset, S.M. (1996). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword . New York: W. W. Norton.
42.
Lynn, L.E., Jr., Heinrich, C.J., & Hill, C.J. (2001). Improving performance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
43.
McCurdy, H.E. (2006). The cultural and ideological background. In H. E. McCurdy & D. H. Rosenbloom (Eds.), Revisiting Waldo's administrative state: Constancy and change in public administration (pp. 35-54). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
44.
Meacham, J., & Thomas, E. (2009, February 16). We are all Socialists now. Newsweek, pp. 23-27.
45.
Meier, K.J., & O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (2006). Bureaucracy in a democratic state: A governance perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
Mettler, S. (2005). Soldiers to citizens: The G.I. Bill and the making of the greatest generation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
Milkis, S., & Nelson, M. (1999). The American presidency: Origins and development, 1776-1998. Washington, DC: CQ Press .
48.
Milward, H.B., & Provan, K.G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359-380.
49.
Moe, T.M. (1989). The politics of bureaucratic structure. In J. E. Chubb & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), Can the government govern? (pp. 267-329). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
50.
Morone, J.A. (1990). The democratic wish: Popular participation and the limits of American government. New York: Basic Books.
51.
Murray, R.K. (1981). Herbert Hoover and the Harding cabinet. In Hawley, E. W. (Ed.), Herbert Hoover as Secretary of Commerce: Studies in New Era thought and practice (pp. 17-42). Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
52.
Nash, G.H. (1988). The life of Herbert Hoover: The humanitarian, 1914-1917. New York: W. W. Norton .
53.
Nash, G.H. (1996). The life of Herbert Hoover: Master of emergencies, 1917-1918. New York: W. W. Norton .
54.
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2004). The search for American Political Development . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2006). The voluntary environmentalists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Remini, R.V. (2008). A short history of the United States. New York: HarperCollins.
59.
Rosenbloom, D.H. (2007). Reinventing administrative prescriptions: The case for democratic-constitutional impact statements and scorecards. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 28-39.
60.
Rosenbloom, D.H., & Piotrowski, S.J. (2005). Outsourcing the constitution and administrative law norms. American Review of Public Administration , 35(2), 103-121.
61.
Rosenbloom, D.H., & Ross, B.H. (1994). Administrative theory, political power, and government reform. In P. W. Ingraham, B. S. Romzek, & Associates (Eds.), New paradigms for government: Issues for the changing public service (pp. 145-167). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
62.
Sandel, M.J. (1984). The procedural republic and the unencumbered self . Political Theory, 12(1), 81-96.
63.
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
64.
Skocpol, T. (2007). Government activism and the reorganization of American civic democracy. In P. Pierson & T. Skocpol (Eds.), The transformation of American politics: Activist government and the rise of conservatism (pp. 39-67). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877-1920. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
66.
Stillman, R.J. (1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. New York: St. Martin's Press.
67.
Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the Progressive Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
68.
Suleiman, E. (2003). Dismantling democratic states. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
Teles, S.M. (2007). Conservative mobilization against entrenched liberalism . In P. Pierson & T. Skocpol (Eds.), The transformation of American politics: Activist government and the rise of conservatism (pp. 160-188). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism and comparative politics . Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369-404.
71.
Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
Waldo, D. (1984). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration (2nd ed.). New York: Holmes & Meier.
73.
Wiebe, R.H. (1967). The search for order, 1877-1920. New York: Hill & Wang.
74.
Wilson, J.H. (1975). Herbert Hoover: Forgotten Progressive. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
75.
Wood, G.S. (2008). The purpose of the past: Reflections on the uses of history. New York: Penguin.
