Reducing Administrative Burdens for Vulnerable Groups: The Role of Job Security and Organizational Commitment

Abstract

Citizens experience onerous encounters with the bureaucracy for various reasons, often political. Administrative burden reduction (ABR) has been pursued to improve citizen-state interactions, especially for vulnerable populations who are disproportionately impacted by burdens. This study seeks to explain the degree of ABR by bureaucrats when the burdens are deployed by their political superiors. We conceptualize it as a function of client vulnerability and bureaucrats’ sense of job security and organizational commitment. We examine these linkages in the context of a COVID-19 rental assistance program for two vulnerable groups—elderly and Blacks. The findings from the two single factorial experiments show that clients’ vulnerability increases the degree of ABR, but only for the elderly. Moreover, bureaucrats who make decisions based on their organizational commitment approach ABR more slowly and only in the context of age vulnerability.

Keywords

adminiatrative burden job security organizational commitment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agley

Xiao

Thompson

E. E.

Golzarri-Arroyo

(2021). Factors associated with reported likelihood to get vaccinated for COVID-19 in a nationally representative US survey. Public Health, 196(21), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.05.009

Aiken

Aurand

Harner

Reina

Yae

(2022). Emergency Rental Assistance (ERA) during the pandemic: Implications for the design of permanent ERA programs. National Low Income Housing Coalition & The Housing Initiative at Penn, 1–14. https://www.housinginitiative.org/uploads/1/3/2/9/132946414/hip_nlihc_2022_3-10_final.pdf

Allen

N. J.

Meyer

J. P.

(1990). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’ commitment and role orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/256294

Alzahrani

Bahari

Alharbi

Alqahtani

(2022). Decision-making styles and job security among nurses working at public hospitals in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional multicentre study. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 16(6), 22–26. 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55689.16520

Ashkanasy

N. M.

Lawrence

S. A.

(2009). Linking job insecurity to negative decision making: The mediating role of job tension. Australia and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM), ANZAM 2006 Paper (pp. 1–20). https://hdl.handle.net/10018/9146.

Baekgaard

Moynihan

D. P.

Thomsen

M. K.

(2021). Why do policymakers support administrative burdens? The roles of deservingness, political ideology, and personal experience. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa033

Bello

Omofowa

Nwachukwu

Nguyen

A. V. H.

(2021). Relationship between organizational politics and organizational commitment. Management, 18(4), 278–287. 10.14704/WEB/V18SI04/WEB18128

Blume

G. H.

(2023). “As expected”: Theoretical implications for racialized administrative power as the Status quo. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac013

Boterman

W. R.

(2020). Urban–rural polarisation in times of the corona outbreak? The early demographic and geographic patterns of the SARS-COV, 2, epidemic in the Netherlands.

10.

Box

R. C

. (1999). Running government like a business: Implications for public administration theory and practice. American Review of Public Administration, 29(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750749922064256

11.

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Bloomberg

. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238

12.

Caillier

J. G.

(2016). Does public service motivation mediate the relationship between goal clarity and both organizational commitment and extra-role behaviours? Public Management Review, 18(2), 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.984625

13.

Choi

N. H.

Neshkova

M. I.

(2019). Inequality and competition in state redistributive systems: Evidence from welfare and health. American Review of Public Administration, 49(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018760305

14.

Conway

Briner

R. B.

(2012). Investigating the effect of collective organizational commitment on unit-level performance and absence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(3), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02051.x

15.

Dahling

J. J.

Chau

S. L.

Mayer

D. M.

Gregory

J. B.

(2012). Breaking rules for the right reasons? An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.730

16.

Davy

J. A.

Kinicki

A. J.

Scheck

C. L

. (1997). A test of job security's direct and mediated effects on withdrawal cognitions. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 18(4), 323–349. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199707)18:4<323::AID-JOB801>3.0.CO;2-%23

17.

Denhardt

R. B.

Denhardt

J. V.

(2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

18.

DeSante

C. D.

(2013). Working twice as hard to get half as far: Race, work ethic, and America’s deserving poor. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12006

19.

Douglas, B. D., Ewell, P. J., & Brauer, M. (2023). Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. Plos one, 18(3), 1–17, e0279720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279720

20.

Dupuy

Defacqz

(2022). Citizens and the legitimacy outcomes of collaborative governance: An administrative burden perspective. Public Management Review, 24(5), 752–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2000254

21.

Frederickson

G. H.

(1971). Toward a new public administration. In Marini

(Ed), Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective, (pp. 315–327). Chandler.

22.

Gibson

M. J.

Hayunga

(2006). We can do better: Lessons learned for protecting older persons in disasters. The AARP Policy Institute.

23.

Gofen

Lotta

(2021). Street-level bureaucrats at the forefront of pandemic response: A comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1861421

24.

Gooden

Portillo

(2011). Advancing social equity in the minnowbrook tradition. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq067

25.

Goren

(2022). Pliable prejudice: The case of welfare. American Journal of Political Science, 66(4), 961–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12652

26.

Halling

Herd

Moynihan

. (2022). How difficult should it be? Evidence of burden tolerance from a nationally representative sample. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2053–2072. 10.1080/14719037.2022.2056910

27.

Hattke

Hensel

Kalucza

(2020). Emotional responses to bureaucratic red tape. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13116

28.

Hemmert

G. A.

Schons

L. M.

Wieseke

Schimmelpfennig

(2018). Log-likelihood-based pseudo-R 2 in logistic regression: Deriving sample-sensitive benchmarks. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(3), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124116638107

29.

Herd

Moynihan

D. P.

(2018). Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means. Russell Sage Foundation.

30.

Huff

Tingley

(2015). Who are these people? Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604648

31.

Ingram

Schneider

(1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044

32.

Jilke

Tummers

(2018). Which clients are deserving of help? A theoretical model and experimental test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy002

33.

Johnson

(2022). Burdens are everybody’s business: Examining the intersection of administrative burdens, motivation, and entrepreneurial culture. Administration & Society, 54(10), 1965–1992. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221100373

34.

Johnson

Kroll

(2021). What makes us tolerant of administrative burden? Race, representation, and identity. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 4(1), 1–14. 10.30636/jbpa.41.201

35.

Johnson

Kroll

(2023). The effect of electronic program applications amidst the politics of administrative burden. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2), 101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101808

36.

Jordan

P. J.

Ashkanasy

N. M.

Hartel

C. E.

(2002). Emotional intelligence as a moderator of emotional and behavioral reactions to job insecurity. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134384

37.

Jung

C. S.

Ritz

(2014). Goal management, management reform, and affective organizational commitment in the public sector. International Public Management Journal, 17(4), 463–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.958801

38.

Jung

Sohn

Y. W.

(2022). Does work passion benefit or hinder employee’s career commitment? The mediating role of work–family interface and the moderating role of autonomy support. PloS One, 17(6), 1–20. 10.1371/journal.pone.0269298

39.

Kamphuis

Glebbeek

A. C.

(2020). Job (in) security and workers’ training decisions: A framing approach. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 7(3), 361–387. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.7.3.6

40.

Keene

D. E.

Rosenberg

Schlesinger

Whittaker

Niccolai

Blankenship

K. M.

(2023). “The squeaky wheel gets the grease”: Rental assistance Applicants’ quests for a rationed and scarce resource. Social Problems, 70(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spab035

41.

Keiser

Miller

(2020). Does administrative burden influence public support for government programs? Evidence from a survey experiment. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13133

42.

Keiser

L. R.

Soss

(1998). With good cause: Bureaucratic discretion and the politics of child support enforcement. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1133–1156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991852

43.

Kelly

(1994). Theories of justice and street-level discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(2), 119–140. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037201

44.

Keyssar

(2009). The right to vote: The contested history of democracy in the United States. Basic Books.

45.

Knight

. (2018, April 25). How to Manage an Insecure Employee. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2018/04/how-to-manage-an-insecure-employee

46.

Koppenjan

J. F. M.

Klijn

E. H.

(2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. Routledge.

47.

Kweit

R. W.

Kweit

M. G.

(1980). Bureaucratic decision-making: Impediments to citizen participation. Polity, 12(4), 647–666. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234304

48.

Lee

S.-Y.

(2021). Is more commitment always better? A study on the side effects of excessive organizational commitment on work–family conflict. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(1), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19857799

49.

Liang

(2016). The shadow of the politics of deservedness? The implications of group-centric policy context for environmental policy implementation inequalities in the United States. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv027

50.

Liang

Park

Zhao

(2020). Representative bureaucracy, distributional equity, and environmental justice. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13160

51.

Lipsky

(1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.

52.

Wang

(2021). Clients’ help deservingness, crowd situational stress and discretionary decision-making: An experimental study of regulatory street-level bureaucrats in China. International Public Management Journal, 24(2), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1661892

53.

Marx-Fleck

., Junker

N. M

., Artinger

., & van Dick

. (2021). Defensive decision making: Operationalization and the relevance of psychological safety and job insecurity from a conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 616–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12353

54.

Mas’ud

Yuniawan

Nugraheni

Idyarti

E. T.

Udin

. (2020). The effect of obsessive work passion and affective commitment on employee performance. Revista ESPACIOS, SSN, 798(41), 22. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n22/a20v41n22p07.pdf

55.

May

P. J.

Winter

S. C.

(2009). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030

56.

Maynard-Moody

Musheno

(2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272

57.

Maynard-Moody

Musheno

(2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Narratives of street-level judgment . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.11924

58.

McGregor

E. B.

(1974). Politics and the career mobility of bureaucrats. American Political Science Review, 68(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959738

59.

Méndez

D. M.

Gómez

S. M.

Camargo

Y. C.

(2021). Healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic from a street-level bureaucracy perspective–A narrative review of literature. Universitas Medica, 62(4), 1–16. 10.11144/javeriana.umed62-4.call

60.

Meyer

J. P.

Allen

N. J.

(1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

61.

Moon

K. K.

Christensen

R. K.

(2022). Moderating diversity, collective commitment, and discrimination: The role of ethical leaders in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(2), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab035

62.

Morrison

E. W.

(2006). Doing the job well: An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. Journal of Management, 32(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277790

63.

Moynihan

Herd

Harvey

(2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009

64.

Moynihan

D. P.

Herd

Ribgy

(2016). Policymaking by other means: Do states use administrative barriers to limit access to medicaid? Administration & Society, 48(4), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713503540

65.

Nelson-Coffey

S. K.

O’Brien

M. M.

Braunstein

B. M.

Mickelson

K. D.

(2021). Health behavior adherence and emotional adjustment during the COVID-19 pandemic in a US nationally representative sample: The roles of prosocial motivation and gratitude. Social Science & Medicine, 284(21), 114243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114243

66.

Nielsen

M. M.

Carvalho

N. R.

Veiga

L. G.

Barbosa

L. S

. (2017, March). Administrative burden reduction over time: Literature review, trends and gap analysis. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 140–148). Retrieved from: https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/69310/1/NCVB17.pdf

67.

O’Leary

(1994). The bureaucratic politics paradox: The case of wetlands legislation in Nevada. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(4), 443–468. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037226

68.

O’Neill

T. A.

Mclarnon

M. J.

(2018). Optimizing team conflict dynamics for high performance teamwork. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.06.002

69.

Oppenheimer

D. M.

Meyvis

Davidenko

(2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009

70.

Palan

Schitter

(2018). Prolific. Ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17(18), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004

71.

Park

S. M.

Rainey

H. G.

(2007). Antecedents, mediators, and consequences of affective, normative, and continuance commitment: Empirical tests of commitment effects in federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(3), 197–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X06296866

72.

Patel

A. P.

Paranjpe

M. D.

Kathiresan

N. P.

Rivas

M. A.

Khera

A. V.

(2020). Race, socioeconomic deprivation, and hospitalization for COVID-19 in English participants of a national biobank. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01227-y

73.

Pedersen

M. J.

Favero

(2020). Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Who are the present and future noncompliers? Public Administration Review, 80(5), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13240

74.

Peer

Brandimarte

Samat

Acquisti

(2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70(17), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006

75.

Plotnick

Turoff

. (2014). Mitigating maladaptive threat rigidity responses to crisis. In van De Walle

Turoff

Hiltz

(Eds.), Information systems for emergency management (pp. 77–106).

76.

Prendergast

(2007). The motivation and bias of bureaucrats. American Economic Review, 97(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.1.180

77.

Probst

T. M.

(2005). Countering the negative effects of job insecurity through participative decision making: Lessons from the demand-control model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(4), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.320

78.

Rafiee

Bahrami

M. A.

Alfaraj

R. M.

Mosavi

M. S.

(2015). Relationship between organizational commitment and ethical decision making among health care managers in Yazd province. Iran. World Journal of Medical Sciences, 12(3), 236–247. 10.5829/idosi.wjms.2015.12.3.92146

79.

Ray

Herd

Moynihan

(2023). Racialized burdens: Applying racialized organization theory to the administrative state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac001

80.

Reyes

M. V.

(2020). The disproportional impact of COVID-19 on African Americans. Health and Human Rights, 22(2), 299. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762908/

81.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2005). Street-level bureaucrats and intrastate variation in the implementation of temporary assistance for needy families policies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui005

82.

Rutledge

P. J.

(2002). Donald C. Stone lecture: Some unfinished business in public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 390–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00192

83.

Schafer

J. A.

Huebner

B. M.

Bynum

T. S.

(2003). Citizen perceptions of police services: Race, neighborhood context, and community policing. Police Quarterly, 6(4), 440–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611102250459

84.

Serekez

. (2021, March 11). We did not suffer equally. New York Times. Retrieved From: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/03/11/opinion/covid-inequality-race-gender.html

85.

Sievert

Vogel

Feeney

M. K.

(2022). Formalization and administrative burden as obstacles to employee recruitment: Consequences for the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20932997

86.

Smart

(2019). Operationalizing a conceptual model of colorism in local policing. Social Justice Research, 32(1), 72–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-018-0318-5

87.

Sowa

J. E.

Selden

S. C.

(2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00333

88.

Staw

B. M.

Sandelands

L. E.

Dutton

J. E.

(1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392337

89.

Stritch

J. M.

Pedersen

M. J.

Taggart

(2017). The opportunities and limitations of using mechanical Turk (Mturk) in public administration and management scholarship. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1276493

90.

Taylor

S. G.

Bedeian

A. G.

Kluemper

D. H.

(2012). Linking workplace incivility to citizenship performance: The combined effects of affective commitment and conscientiousness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 878–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.773

91.

Veiga

Janowski

Barbosa

L. S

. (2016). Digital government and administrative burden reduction. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 323–326. Retrieved from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2910019.2910107

92.

Wilson

P. A.

(1995). The effects of politics and power on the organizational commitment of federal executives. Journal of Management, 21(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100106

93.

Winter

S. C.

Mikkelsen

M. F.

Skov

P. R.

(2022). Individual agency in street-level bureaucrats’ implementation of policy reforms: The role of their policy evaluation and self-efficacy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4), 781–794. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac003

94.

Zacka

(2017). When the state meets the street: Public service and moral agency. Harvard University Press.

95.

Zhang

Liu

(2020). Professional power, job security, and decision making in project funding: The Assessors’ perspective. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(2), 1–11. 10.2224/sbp.8567