Complex global challenges cut across organizational and sectoral boundaries, increasing calls for holistic responses. Seeing the whole across diverse stakeholders is challenging for participants in complex systems, yet doing so is essential for engaging effectively in systems change. A promising new method known as relational mapping, based on relational coordination theory, has been used to facilitate complex systems change. Here, we propose that relational mapping can be applied to help participants (1) see the whole in relation to the parts, (2) share their explicit and tacit knowledge, (3) engage in dialogue across distinct perspectives supported by the map as a boundary object, (4) reduce the impact of power differences, and (5) prepare to co-design interventions from multiple perspectives. This paper presents an illustrative case of relational mapping in the context of public administration in a South Carolina community engaging in complex systems change. Our analysis suggests a set of boundary conditions for the success of relational mapping, including the willingness of participants to seek integrative solutions to a conflict or problem and facilitation that is attentive to differential power and status among stakeholders. We conclude that relational mapping is a powerful, theoretically grounded method that enables the visual assessment of multi-level stakeholder relationships, preparing participants to engage in complex systems change and then present a template for use of relational mapping more broadly.
AwhE.PashlerH. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.834
3.
BakerN. J.SuchmanA.RawlinsD.. (2016). Hidden in plain view: Barriers to quality improvement. Physician Leadership Journal, 3(2), 54–57.
4.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (trans. McGee VW). University of Texas Press.
5.
BartelC. A.RockmannK. W. (2024). The disease of indifference: How relational systems provide attentional infrastructure for organizational resilience. Strategic Organization, 22(1), 18–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270231183441
6.
BartunekJ. M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 355–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393029
7.
BartunekJ. M. (2022). Social scientists confronting global crises. Routledge.
8.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
9.
BechkyB. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
10.
BechkyB. A. (2006). Gaffers, gofers and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0149
11.
BoltonR.LoganC.GittellJ. H. (2021). Revisiting relational coordination: A systematic review. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(3), 290–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886321991597
12.
BrysonJ. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722
13.
BrysonJ. M.AckermannF.EdenC. (2016). Discovering collaborative advantage: The contributions of goal categories and visual strategy mapping. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 912–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12608
14.
BrysonJ. M.AndersonS. R. (2000). Applying large-group interaction methods in the planning and implementation of major change efforts. Public Administration Review, 60(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00073
15.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
16.
CarlileP. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
17.
CarmeliA.GittellJ. H. (2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.565
18.
ChughD.BazermanM. H.BanajiM. R. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, law, Medicine, and Public Policy, 17(1), 74–95.
19.
ChughD.KernM. C. (2016). A dynamic and cyclical model of bounded ethicality. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 85–100.
20.
ClarkeD.HellowellM.O’HanlonB.EldridgeC. (2020). All hands on deck: Mobilizing the private sector for the COVID-19 response. UHC2030.
21.
CrosbyB. C.BrysonJ. M. (2018). Why leadership of public leadership research matters: And what to do about it. Public Management Review, 20(9), 1265–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1348731
22.
CunliffeA. L. (2008). Orientations to social constructionism: Relationally responsive social constructionism and its implications for knowledge and learning. Management Learning, 39(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607087578
23.
Cutcher-GershenfeldJ.BrooksD.MulloyM. (2015). Inside the Ford-UAW transformation:Pivotal events in valuing work and delivering results (pp. 1–379). MIT Press.
24.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
25.
DemingW. E. (2018, original 1986). Out of the crisis, reissue. MIT Press.
26.
EdenC.AckermannF. (1998). Analysing and comparing idiographic causal maps. In EdenC.SpenderJ. C. (Eds.), Managerial and organizational cognition (pp. 192–209). Sage.
27.
EdenC.AckermannF. (2021). Modeling stakeholder dynamics for supporting group decision and negotiation: Theory to practice. Group Decision and Negotiation, 30(5), 1001–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09745-y
28.
EwensteinB.WhyteJ. (2009). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as epistemic objects. Organization Studies, 30(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608083014
29.
FollettM. P. (1949). Freedom and coordination: Lectures in business organization by Mary Parker Follett. Management Publications Trust, Ltd.
30.
FollettM. P. (2011). Constructive conflict. In GodfreyM.GittellJ. H. (Eds.), Sociology of organizations: Structures and relationships. Sage Publications.
31.
GeboE.BondB. J. (2022a). Improving interorganizational collaborations: An application in a violence reduction context. The Social Science Journal, 59(2), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.09.008
32.
GeboE.BondB. J. (2022b). Advancing interorganizational crime and violence reduction goals through a relational change intervention. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 33(5), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211065996
33.
GittellJ. H. (2000). Organizing work to support relational co-ordination. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(3), 517–539.
34.
GittellJ. H. (2002a). Relationships between service providers and their impact on customers. Journal of Service Research, 4(4), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502004004007
35.
GittellJ. H. (2002b). Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Science, 48(11), 1408–1426. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.11.1408.268
36.
GittellJ. H. (2006). Relational coordination: Coordinating work through relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect. In Relational perspectives in organizational studies: A research companion (pp. 74–94). Edward Elgar Publishing.
37.
GittellJ. H. (2016). Transforming relationships for high performance: The power of relational coordination. Stanford University Press.
38.
GittellJ. H.AliH. N. (2021). Relational analytics. Routledge Publishing.
39.
GittellJ. H.DouglassA. (2012). Relational bureaucracy: Structuring reciprocal relationships into roles. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 709–733. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0438
40.
GittellJ. H.SeidnerR.WimbushJ. (2010). A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organization Science, 21(2), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0446
41.
GittellJ. H.StephensJ. P. (2019). Relational organizing for multilevel systems change. In Professional development workshop, academy of management annual meeting, Boston, MA.
42.
GrønA. B.HvilstedL.IngerslevK.JacobsenC. B.BechM.Holm-PetersenC. (2024). Can leadership improve interorganizational collaboration? Field-experimental evidence from a team-based leadership training intervention. The American Review of Public Administration, 54(5), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241232681
43.
HajjarL.CookB. S.DomlynA.RayK. A.LairdD.WandersmanA. (2020). Readiness and relationships are crucial for coalitions and collaboratives: Concepts and evaluation tools. New Directions for Evaluation, 2020(165), 103–122.
44.
HajjarL.GittellJ. H.MeierN.GunnW. (2024). Breaking down silos to build collaborative systems. In CarlsonC.KriegsmanM.Cutcher-GershenfeldJ. (Eds.), The Heller social impact case collection: Reimagining capitalism through case-based learning (pp. 166). Brandeis University Press.
HeadB. W.AlfordJ. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
47.
HouseS.AliH. N.NewhouseR.StuckyC. (2023). A relational coordination training intervention to improve job satisfaction and intent to stay in the intensive care unit: A pilot study. Nursing Outlook, 71(4), 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2023.102001
48.
HuyQ. N. (2002). Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 31–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094890
49.
KelloggK. C.OrlikowskiW. J.YatesJ. (2006). Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0157
KlindtM. P.BaadsgaardK.JørgensenH. (2024). Boundary spanning and partnership performance: Bringing the structural perspective into the game. Public Management Review, 26(10), 2776–2801. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2197914
52.
KnightE.Cutcher-GershenfeldJ.MittlemanB. (2015). The biomarkers consortium: Dynamic tension and the art of managing collaborative complexity. Sloan Management Review, 57(1), 16–19.
53.
LewisL.IsbellM. G.KoschmannM. (2010). Collaborative tensions: Practitioners’ experiences of interorganizational relationships. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 460–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.523605
MaloneT. W.CrowstonK. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 26(1), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1145/174666.174668
56.
MandellM. P. (1994). Managing interdependencies through program structures: A revised paradigm. The American Review of Public Administration, 24(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409402400106
57.
McMackinJ.FloodP. (2019). A theoretical framework for the social pillar of lean. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0039
58.
MeierN.IngerslevK. (2023). Making sense of change through simulation: Organizational futures at play. Journal of Change Management, 23(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2023.2216204
59.
MetcalfH. C.UrwickL. (2004). Dynamic administration: the collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. Routledge.
60.
MizrahiT.RosenthalB. B.IveryJ. (2013). Coalitions, collaborations, and partnerships: Interorganizational approaches to social change. In The handbook of community practice (pp. 383–402). Sage.
61.
NanayB. (2016). Aesthetics as philosophy of perception. Oxford University Press.
62.
NicoliniD.MengisJ.SwanJ. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
65.
OstromE. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
66.
PavezI.FeyerhermA.ValenzuelaF.ZandeeD. (2022). Collaborating across organizational boundaries to co-create a more just, resilient, and thriving society. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 58(4), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863221126745
ProvanK. G.MilwardH. B. (1989). The interorganizational delivery of mental health services through a service implementation network. In Meeting of the national academy of management, August (pp. 13–15).
69.
PurdyE. I.McLeanD.AlexanderC.ScottM.DonohueA.CampbellD.WullschlegerM.BerkowitzG.WinearlsJ.HenryD.BrazilV. (2020). Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care. BMJ open quality, 9(1), e000749. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000749
RousseauD. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1–37.
72.
ScheinE. H. (2013). On communication. Reflections / Sigma Theta Tau, 13(2).
73.
SengeP. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.
74.
ShotterJ. (1994). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. Sage.
75.
SimonH. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. Models of man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting, 6(1), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
76.
SmetsM.MorrisT. I. M.GreenwoodR. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0013
77.
SmithK. K.KaminsteinD. S.MakadokR. J. (1995). The health of the corporate body: Illness and organizational dynamics. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(3), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886395313006
78.
The Stakeholder Alignment Collaborative. (2022). J. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, K.S. Baker, N. Berente, P. Arthur Berkman, H. Burman, P. Canavan, F.A. Feltus, A. Garmulewicz, A. Gounden Rock, R. Hutchins, J.L. King, C. Kirkpatrick, W.C. Lenhardt, P. Levin, S. Lewis, M. Maffie, M. Mayernik, B. Mittleman, S. Nusser, B. Plale, R. Sampath, N. Shin, S. Stall, J. Towns, S. Winter, P. Veazey, K. Zarecor (2022). When launching a collaboration, keep it agile. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 20(2), 40–47.
79.
The Stakeholder Alignment Collaborative. (2025). J. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, K. Anderson, K.S. Baker, N. Berente, H.M. Berman, A. Blatecky, C. Borgman, P. Canavan, Y. Diaz-Linhart, A. Garmulewicz, B. Clark, A. Gounden Rock, B. Grant, M. Haberman, R. Hutchins, J.L. King, C.R. Kirkpatrick, J.C Klensin, K. Leary, W.C. Lenhardt, M. Maffie, L. Michael, B.B. Mittleman, R. Sampath, S. Soroui, N. Shin, M. Ward, S. Winter, K.E. Zarecor. The consortia century: Aligning for impact. Oxford University Press.
80.
StarS. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624
81.
StarS.GriesemerJ. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
82.
StephensJ. P. (2021). How the show goes on: Using the aesthetic experience of collective performance to adapt while coordinating. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220911056
83.
StephensJ. P.BolandB. J. (2015). The aesthetic knowledge problem of problem-solving with design thinking. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492614564677
TushmanM. L.NadlerD. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/257550
89.
ValentineM. A.NembhardI. M.EdmondsonA. C. (2015). Measuring teamwork in health care settings: A review of survey instruments. Medical Care, 53(4), e16–e30. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feef6
90.
Van EykH.BaumF. (2002). Learning about interagency collaboration: Trialling collaborative projects between hospitals and community health services. Health & Social Care in the Community, 10(4), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00369.x
91.
WallersteinN. (1993). Empowerment and health: The theory and practice of community change. Community Development Journal, 28(3), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/28.3.218
