Salish Perspectives on Human–Plant Relationships: Embracing Authenticity and Complexity

Abstract

This paper explores the intricate relationship between humans and plants from the perspective of Salish concepts, shedding light on the tradition of attributing human-desired qualities to the botanical world. Although plants possess traits that appeal to human desires, it is essential to recognize their inherent distinction from humans. Through historical utilization by Salish communities, a spiritual reciprocal bond has been established, necessitating the adherence to human-like protocols to maintain a symbiotic relationship. However, this exploration advocates against romanticizing this relationship, as it has the potential to foster internal stereotyping while leading to external discrepancies in philosophical pursuits. By carefully examining Salish practices from past to present, an emphasis is placed on the significance of comprehending and respecting the uniqueness of plant life. Through this analysis, the primary goal is to enhance our understanding of the profound connection between humans and plants while embracing the authenticity and complexity of this relationship. Appreciating the true nature of the bond can offer valuable insights into sustainable coexistence with the botanical world and contribute to fostering a more balanced and respectful relationship between humans and the natural environment.

Keywords

Salish worldview Indigenous philosophy Indigenous environmental ethics Indigenous relationality human–plant relationality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldern

J. D.

Goode

R. W.

. 2014. “The Stories Hold Water: Learning and Burning in North Fork Mono Homelands.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 3: 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.009

Arlee

2008. The Gift of the Bitterroot: A Salish and Pend d’ Oreille Story. Pablo, MT: Npustin Press.

Armstrong

J. C.

2009. Constructing Indigeneity: Syilx Okanagan Oraliture and Tmixwcentrism. Doctoral Dissertation, Landscape Ecology and Nature Conservation Department, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Universität Greifswald.

Arola

2011. “Native American Philosophy.” In The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy, edited by Garfield

J. L.

Edelglass

, 562–573. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Baumann

D. F.

2023. “Thrivance is My Identity.” Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies 4: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1669

Beck

B. S.

1982. “Agnes Vanderburg: a woman's life in the Flathead culture.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT.

Boas

Teit

J. A.

. 1927. Coeur d'Alene, Flathead, and Okanogan Indians. Fairfield, WA: Ye Galleon Press.

Booth

A. L.

2003. “We are the Land: Native American Views of Nature.” In Nature Across Cultures: Views of Nature and the Environment in non-Western Cultures, edited by Selin

, 329–349. Netherlands: Springer.

Curtis

E. S.

1911. “Coyote Kills a Monster.” In The North American Indian; Being a Series of Volumes Picturing and Describing the Indians of the United States, and Alaska, edited by Hodge

F. W.

. Vol. 7, 102–103. Cambridge, MA: The University Press.

10.

Giorda

S. J.

1879. A Dictionary of the Kalispel or Flat-head Indian Language. Part 1. Kalispel-English. Compiled by the Missionaries of the Society of Jesus. St. Ignatius: St. Ignatius Print.

11.

Hansen

1947. Full Blood Flathead Indian Montana Study Group. Arlee, MT: Minutes of Meeting. Flathead Indian Reservation, University of Montana.

12.

Hart

J. A.

1974. “Plant taxonomy of the Salish and Kootenai Indians of Western Montana.” Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, University of Montana.

13.

Hart

Jeffrey A

. 1979. “The ethnobotany of the flathead indians of Western Montana.” Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University 27: 261–307.

14.

Hill-Tout

1905. “Some Features of the Language and Culture of the Salish.” American Anthropologist 7: 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1905.7.4.02a00140

15.

Hill

Greg.

2013. “Afterword: Looking Back to Sakahàn.” In Sakahàn International Indigenous Art, edited by Hill

Hopkins

Lalonde

, 136–140. Ottawa: National Gallery of Canada.

16.

Hoffman

W. J.

1883. “Selish Myths.” Bulletin of the Essex Institute 15: 23–40.

17.

Kimmerer

2011. “Restoration and Reciprocity: The Contributions of Traditional Ecological Knowledge.” In Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration: Integrating Science, Nature, and Culture, edited by Egan

Hjerpe

E. E.

Abram

, 257–276. Washington, DC: Island Press.

18.

Kroeber

P. D.

1999. The Salish Language Family: Reconstructing Syntax. Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press.

19.

Lackschewitz

1991. Vascular plants of west-central Montana: Identification GuideBbook, No. 277. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.

20.

Lothrop

G R

. 1970. Father Gregory Mengarini, An Italian Jesuit Missionary in the Transmontane West, His Life and Memoirs. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern Caifornia, Los Angeles, CA.

21.

Malouf

R. T.

1979. Camas and the Flathead Indians of Montana. University of Montana Contributions to Anthropology No.7, unpublished manuscript.

22.

Maryanski

2021. “The Sociology of Kinship: A Case for Looking Back to the Future.” In The Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory, 267–299. Cham: Springer.

23.

McDonald

1973 Jul 1. “TALES: Coyote Foils the Terrible Jocko Valley Dragon.” Char-Koosta News. Pablo, MT.

24.

Mengarini

1871–72. “Indians of Oregon, etc.” Journal of Anthropological Institute of New York 1: 81–88.

25.

Pete

2010. Seliš Nyoʔnuntn: Medicine for the Salish Language. Pablo, MT: Salish Kootenai College Press.

26.

Pichette

1974. “Coyote Kills The Dragon of the Valley.” In Coyote Tales of the Montana Salish, edited by Miller

Harrison

, 20–25. Rapid City, SD: The Tipi Shop.

27.

Pierotti

Wildcat

. 2000. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge: The Third Alternative (Commentary).” Ecological Applications 10: 1333–1340. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1333:TEKTTA]2.0.CO;2

28.

Point

1967. Wilderness Kingdom, Indian Life in the Rocky Mountains: 1840–1847: The Journal & Paintings of Nicolas Point, SJ, edited by Donnelly

J. P.

. Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press.

29.

Purcell

L. S.

2021. “Truth, Rootedness, and The Good Life in Aztec Ethical Philosophy.” Native American and Indigenous Philosophy 21: 4–11.

30.

Ray

V. F.

1939. Cultural relations in the Plateau of Northwestern America. Publication of the Frederick Webb Hodge Anniversary Publication Fund No. 3. Southwest Museum, Los Angeles, CA.

31.

Read

2001. “What is Kinship?” In The Cultural Analysis of Kinship: The Legacy of David Schneider and Its Implications for Anthropological Relativism, edited by Feinberg

Ottenheimer

, 78–117. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

32.

Reichard

G. A.

Froelich

. 1947. An analysis of Coeur d'Alene Indian myths. Philadelphia, PA: American Folklore Society.

33.

Salmón

2000. “Kincentric Ecology: Indigenous Perceptions of the Human–Nature Relationship.” Ecological Applications 10: 1327–1332. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1327:KEIPOT]2.0.CO;2

34.

Schaeffer

1932. Glenbow Institute, Calgary, Alberta. Claude Schaeffer collection, microfilm reels.

35.

Stone

1911 Dec 16. “The Dragon of the Selish.” Sunday Missoulian, Missoula, MT.

36.

Teit

J. A.

1930. “The Salishan Tribes of the Western Plateaus.” In Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, edited by Boas

, 23–396. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

37.

Teit

J. A.

Farrand

Gould

M. K.

Spinden

H. J.

. 1917. Folk-tales of Salishan and Sahaptin Tribes, edited by Boas

. Lancaster, PA: American Folklore Society.

38.

Theobald

D. L.

2010. “A Formal Test of the Theory of Universal Common Ancestry.” Nature 465(7295): 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09014

39.

Turner

N. J.

2016. “Roots of Reflection”: Spiritual Aspects of Plant Harvesting, Ethnoecological Practice and Sustainability for Indigenous Peoples of Northwestern North America.” Les Actes de Colloques du Musée du Quai Branly Jacques Chirac 6: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4000/actesbranly.665

40.

Turner

N. J.

Ignace

M. B.

Ignace

. 2000. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Wisdom of Aboriginal Peoples in British Columbia.” Ecological Applications 10(5): 1275–1287. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1275:TEKAWO]2.0.CO;2

41.

Turney-High

1933. “Cooking Camas and Bitter Root.” The Scientific Monthly 36: 262–263.

42.

Turney-High

Harry H.

1937. “The Flathead Indians of Montana”. Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association (48): 1–161.

43.

Tynan

2021. “What is Relationality? Indigenous Knowledges, Practices, and Responsibilities with Kin.” Cultural Geographies 28: 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/14744740211029287

44.

Vanderburg

1971. “The Swallowing Monster.” In Tales from the Bitterroot Valley and Other Salish Folk Stories, edited by Law

, 17–20. Billings, MT: Montana Indian Publications.

45.

Weisel

G. F.

1951. “The Ram's Horn Tree and Other Medicine Trees of the Flathead Indians.” The Montana Magazine of History 1: 3–13.

46.

Wildcat

Voth

. 2023. “Indigenous Relationality: Definitions and Methods.” AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 19(2): 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801231168380