Tradeoffs Between Directed and Autonomous Driving on the Mars Exploration Rovers

Abstract

NASA’s Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) have collected a great diversity of geological science results, thanks in large part to their surface mobility capabilities. The six wheel rocker/bogie mobility system provides driving capabilities in a range of terrain types, while the onboard IMU measures actual rover attitude changes (roll, pitch and yaw, but not position) quickly and accurately. Four stereo camera pairs provide accurate position knowledge and/or terrain assessment. Solar panels generally provide enough energy to drive the vehicle for at most four hours each day, but drive time is often restricted by other planned activities. Driving along slopes in nonhomogeneous terrain injects unpredictable amounts of slip into each drive. These restrictions led to the creation of driving strategies that alternately use more or less onboard autonomy, to maximize drive speed and distance at the cost of increased complexity in the sequences of commands built by human Rover Planners each day.

Commands to the MER vehicles are typically transmitted at most once per day, so mobility operations are encoded as event-driven sequences of individual motion commands. Motions may be commanded using quickly-executing Directed commands which perform only reactive motion safety checks (e.g., real-time current limits, maximum instantaneous vehicle tilt limit), slowly-executing position measuring Visual Odometry (VisOdom) commands, which use images to accurately update the onboard position estimate, or slow-to-medium speed Autonomous Navigation (AutoNav) commands, which use onboard image processing to perform predictive terrain safety checks and optional autonomous Path Selection.

In total, the MER rovers have driven more than 10 kilometers over Martian terrain during their first 21 months of operation using these basic modes. In this paper we describe the strategies adopted for selecting between human-planned Directed drives versus rover-adaptive Autonomous Navigation, Visual Odometry and Path Selection drives.

Keywords

Mars Rover MER space robotics autonomy mission planning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali, K. S. , Vanelli, C. A. , Biesiadecki, J. J. , Maimone, M. W. , Cheng, Y. , San Martin, M. , and Alexander, J. W. (2005). Attitude and position esimation on the Mars Exploration Rovers . IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, The Big Island, Hawaii, USA, October.

Bares, J. and Wettergreen, D. (1999). Dante II: Technical description, results and lessons learned . International Journal of Robotics Research, 18(7): 621-649 .

Biesiadecki, J. J. and Maimone, M. W. (2006). The Mars Exploration Rover surface mobility flight software: Driving ambition . IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, March, Vol. 5.

Cheng, Y. , Maimone, M. , and Matthies, L. (2006). Visual Odometry on the Mars Exploration Rovers . IEEE Robotics and Automation Special Issue (MER), 13(2): 54-62 .

Backes, P. et al. (2003). Sequence planning for the Fido Mars rover prototype . IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA.

Gage, D. W. (1995). UGV history 101: A brief history of unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) development efforts . Unmanned Systems Magazine Special Issue on Unmanned Ground Vehicles, 13(3), Summer. http://www.nosc.mil/robots/pubs/ugvhist95-nopix.pdf.

Goldberg, S. B. , Maimone, M. W. , and Matthies, L. (2002). Stereo vision and rover navigation software for planetary exploration . IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, March, Vol. 5, pp. 2025-2036 .

Golombek, M. and Rapp, D. (1997). Size-frequency distributions of rocks on Mars and Earth analog sites: Implications for future landed missions . Journal of Geophysical Research -Planets, 102(E2): 4117-4129 .

Harrington, B. and Voorhees, C. (2004). The challenges of designing the rocker-bogie suspension for the Mars Exploration Rover . 37th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, Galveston, Texas, USA, May.

10.

Jochem, T. and Pomerleau, D. (1996). Life in the fast lane: The evolution of an adaptive vehicle control system . AI Magazine, 17(2): 11-50 .

11.

Kelley, A. , Stentz, A. , Amidi, O. , Bode, M. , Bradley, D. , Diaz-Calderon, A. , et al. (2006). Toward reliable off road autonomous vehicles operating in challenging environments . International Journal of Robotics Research, 25(5-6): 449-483 .

12.

Krotkov, E. , Simmons, R. , Cozman, F. , and Koenig, S. (1998). Safeguarded teleoperation for lunar rovers . 26th International Conference on Environmental Systems, July.

13.

Leger, C. and Deen, R. (2005). Remote image analysis for Mars Exploration Rover mobility and manipulation operations . IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Big Island, Hawaii, USA, October.

14.

Li, R. X. , Archinal, B. A. , Arvidson, R. E. , Bell, J. , Christensen, P. , Crumpler, L. , et al. (2005). Spirit rover localization and topographic mapping at the landing site of Gusev Crater, Mars . JGR-Planets, Special Issue on Spirit Rover, to appear.

15.

Maki, J. N. , Bell III, J. F. , Herkenhoff, K. E. , Squyres, S. W. , Kiely, A. , Klimesh, M. , et al. (2003). Mars Exploration Rover engineering cameras . Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(E12): 12-1-12-24 . http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2003/2003JE002077.shtml.

16.

Mishkin, A. , Morrison, j. , Nguyen, T. , Stone, H. , Cooper, B. , and Wilcox, B. (1998). Experiences with operations and autonomy of the mars pathfinder microrover . Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Snowmass atAspen, CO, March.

17.

Mishkin, A. H. , Limonadi, D. , Laubach, S. L. , and Bass, D. S. (2006). Working the martian night shift: The MER surface operations process . IEEE Robotics and Automation Special Issue (MER), pp. 46-53 .

18.

Murphy, R. (2004). Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics . IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, special issue on Human-Robot Interaction, 34(2).

19.

Simmons, R. , Henriksen, L. , Chrisman, L. , and Whelan, G. (1996). Obstacle avoidance and safeguarding for a lunar rover . AIAA Forum on Advanced Developments in Space robotics, Madison, WI, August. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/%7Ereids/papers/AIAAobsAvoid.pdf.

20.

Singh, H. , Roman, C. , Pizarro, O. , and Eustice, R. (2005). Advances in high resolution imaging from underwater vehicles . International Symposium of Robotics Research, San Francisco, CA, USA, October.

21.

Thrun, S. , Montemerlo, M. , Dahlkamp, H. , Stavens, D. , Aron, A. , Diebel, J. , et al. (2006). Winning the DARPA grand challenge . Journal of Field Robotics, Accepted for publication, http://robots.stanford.edu/papers/thrun.stanley05.pdf.

22.

Urmson, C. , Ragusa, C. , Ray, D. , Anhalt, J. , Bartz, D. , Galatali, T. , et al. (2006). A robust approach to high-speed navigation for unrehearsed desert terrain . Journal of Field Robotics, 23(8): 467-508 .

23.

Vaniman, D. T. , Heiken, G. H. , and French, B. M. (eds). (1991). Lunar Sourcebook: A User’s Guide to the Moon. Cambridge University Press .

24.

Wettergreen, D. , Bapna, D. , Maimone, M. , and Thomas, G. (1999). Developing Nomad for robotic exploration of the Atacama desert . Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 26(2-3): 127-148 .

25.

Wright, J. , Hartman, F. , Cooper, B. , Maxwell, S. , Yen, J. , and Morrison, J. (2006). Driving on mars with rsvp . IEEE Robotics and Automation Special Issue (MER), pp. 37-45 .

26.

Yen, J. , Cooper, B. , Hartman, F. , Maxwell, S. , and Wright, J. (2004). Sequence rehearsal and validation on surface operations of the Mars Exploration Rovers . SpaceOps, Montreal, Canada .