This paper presents a time invariant kinematic motion controller for wheeled mobile robots. Actuator capability, mechanical design, and traction forces governed by terrain features provide velocity and curvature limitations that are used in the design of the controller. A novel path manifold that considers curvature limitations is introduced to provide a desired path shape and convergence to the reference posture or trajectory. Lyapunov techniques are then used to derive a control law that asymptotically converges the robot to an arbitrarily small neighborhood of the path manifold. Posture regulation, path following, and trajectory tracking capability to a similarly scaled neighborhood of the target are provided. Controller parameters are optimized and initial conditions are identified that satisfy physical constraints of the robot and provide smooth commands. Curvature boundaries and asymptotic convergence naturally limit allowable initial conditions and are resolved by driving the robot to intermediate goal points within regions of allowable initial conditions. Posture regulation is evaluated in simulation and experiment on a Compliant Framed wheeled Modular Mobile Robot (CFMMR) for two different terrain surfaces. Trajectory tracking and path following of constant curvature references are evaluated in simulation and experiment, respectively.
Aicardi, M., Casalino, G., Bicchi, A., and Balestrino, A. (1995). Closed loop steering of unicycle like vehicles via Lyapunov techniques. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine , 2(1): 27—35.
2.
Albiston, B.W. and Minor, M.A. (2003). Curvature based point stabilization for compliant framed wheeled modular mobile robots. Proceedings of IEEE International Conf erence on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 83—89.
3.
Antonelli, G., Chiaverini, S. and Fusco, G. (2001). Real-time path tracking for unicycle-like mobile robots under velocity and acceleration constraints. Proceedings of American Control Conference, June, Arlington, VA, pp. 119—124.
4.
Astolfi, A. (1994). On the stabilization of nonholonomic systems. Proceedings of IEEE Conf erence on Decision and Control, Lake Buena Vista, FL, Vol. 4, pp. 3481—3486.
5.
Astolfi, A. (1999). Exponential stabilization of a wheeled mobile robot via discontinuous control. Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 121(1): 121—127.
6.
Bacciotti, A. (1991). Local Stabilizability of Nonlinear Control Systems . World Scientific, Singapore.
7.
Badreddin, E. and Mansour, M. (1993). Fuzzy-tuned state-feedback control of a non-holonomic mobile robot. Proceedings of the 12th Triennial World Congress of IFAC, Sydney, Australia, pp. 769—772.
8.
Brock, O. and Khatib, O. (1999). High-speed navigation using the global dynamic window approach. Proceedings of IEEE International Conf erence on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, MI, pp. 341—346.
9.
Brockett, R.W. (1983). Asymptotic stability and feedback stabilization . In Differential Geometric Control Theory, volume 27 of Progress in Mathematics (eds R. W. Brockett, R. S. Millman, and H. J. Sussmann), pp. 181—191, Birkhauser, Boston, MA.
10.
Chwa, D. (2004). Sliding-mode tracking control of nonholonomic wheeled mobile robots in polar coordinates. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 12(4): 637— 644.
11.
Coron, J.M. and d'Andrea-Novel, B. (1993). Smooth stabilizing time-varying control laws for a class of nonlinear systems. Application to mobile robots . Proceedings of IFAC Symposium Nonlinear Control Systems Design 1992, Bordeaux, France, pp. 413—418.
12.
Craig, J.J. (1989). Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control . Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
13.
de Wit, C.C. and Sordalen, O.J. (1992). Exponential stabilization of mobile robots with nonholonomic constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , 37(11): 1791— 1797.
14.
Fox, D., Burgard, W. and Thrun, S. (1997). The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance . IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 4(1): 23—33.
15.
Guldner, J. and Utkin, V.I. (1993). Sliding mode control for an obstacle avoidance strategy based on an harmonic potential field. Proceedings of IEEE Conf erence Decision and Control, San Antonio, TX, pp. 424—429.
16.
Indiveri, G. (1999). Kinematic time-invariant control of a 2D nonholonomic vehicle. Proceedings of IEEE International Conf erence on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, Vol. 3, pp. 2112—2117.
17.
Kim, Y. and Minor, M.A. (2005). Bounded smooth time invariant motion control of unicycle kinematic models. Proceedings of IEEE International Conf erence on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 3687— 3692.
18.
Lee, T.-C., Song, K.-T., Lee, C.-H. and Teng, C.-C. (2001). Tracking control of unicycle-modeled mobile robots using a saturation feedback controller. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 9(2): 305—318.
19.
Minor, M.A., Albiston, B.W. and Swensen, C.L. (2006). Simplified motion control of a two axle compliant framed wheeled mobile robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , 22(3): 491—506.
20.
Morin, P. and Samson, C. (2000). Control of nonlinear chained systems: from the Routh—Hurwitz stability criterion to time-varying exponential stabilizers . IEEE Transactions on on Automatic Control, 45(1): 141—146.
21.
Oriolo, G., De Luca, A. and Vendittelli, M. (2002). WMR control via dynamic feedback linearization: design, implementation, and experimental validation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 10(6): 835—852.
22.
Samson, C. (1993). Time-varying feedback stabilization of car-like wheeled mobile robots. International Journal ofRobotics Research, 12(1): 55—64.
23.
Samson, C. (1995). Control of chained systems application to path following and time-varying point-stabilization of mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40(1): 64—77.
24.
Sellen, J. (1995). Planning paths of minimal curvature. Proceedings of IEEE International Conf erence on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 1976—1982.
25.
Shkel, A.M. and Lumelsky, V.J. (1997). Curvature-constrained motion within a limited workspace. Proceedings of IEEE International Conf erence on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 1394—1399.
26.
Shoop, S., Young, B., Alger, R. and Davis, J. (1994). Winter traction testing. Automotive Engineering, Warrendale, PA, 102(1): 75—78.
27.
Siegwart, R. and Nourbakhsh, I.R. (2004). Introduction to Autonomous Mobile Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
28.
Spenko, M., Kuroda, Y., Dubowsky, S. and Iagnemma, K. (2006). Hazard avoidance for high-speed mobile robots in rough terrain. Journal of Field Robotics, 23(5): 311—331.
29.
Tayebi, A. and Rachid, A. (1997). A unified discontinuous state feedback controller for the path-following and the point-stabilization problems of a unicycle-like mobile robot. Proceedings of International Conf erence on Control Applications, Hartford, CT, pp. 31—35.
30.
Tayebi, A., Tadjine, M. and Rachid, A. (1996). Path-following and point-stabilization control laws for a wheeled mobile robot. Proceedings of UKACC International Conf erence on Control, Exeter, UK, pp. 878—883.
31.
Webers, C. and Zimmer, U.R. (2000). Practical trade-offs in robust target following . Proceedings of International Congress on Intelligent Systems and Applications, International Symposium on Industrial Systems. University of Wollongong, Australia.
32.
Zhu, X., Kim, Y., Merrel, R. and Minor, M.A. (2007). Cooperative motion control and sensing architecture in compliant framed modular mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics: in press.
33.
Zhu, X., Kim, Y. and Minor, M.A. (2005). Cooperative distributed robust control of modular mobile robots with bounded curvature and velocity. Proceedings of IEEE/ASME International Conf erence on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Monterey, CA, pp. 1151—1157.
