An Experimental Study of Nonlinear Stiffness,Hysteresis,and Friction Effects in Robot Joints with Harmonic Drives and Torque Sensors

Abstract

Despite widespread industrial applicatzon of harmonic drives, the source of some elastokinetic phenomena and their impact on overall system behavior has not been fully addressed thus far. Some of these phenomena severely influence the behavior of robot arms, both in free and constrained motions, when the end effector is in contact with an environment. The primary goal of this study is to derive an effective, control-oriented model of a harmonic-drive-based robot joint. Systematic observations of an experimental robot with harmonic drives has revealed that the harmonic drive could not entirely transmit the input torque to the output shaft, due to a nonlinear meshing process between the flexible and circular spline teeth. The torque transmitted to the output shaft might saturate at a much lower value than expected (e.g., motor torque multiplied by the gear ratio). This phenomenon may severely influence the system behavior, par ticularly in force/impedance control tasks when full joint-torque capacity and wide bandwidth are needed. To understand the harmonic-drive behavior, as well as to derive a convenient form of its model, we have shown restrained motion experi ments to be much more useful than free-motion experiments.

In this article, we also introduce mathematical models and describe experiments related to other physical phenomena, such as nonlinear stiffness, hysteresis, and soft windup. The goal of our modeling strategy was not to develop a precise and possi bly complicated model, but to generate an appropriate model that could be easily used by control engineers to improve joint behavior To visualize the developed model, equivalent mechan ical and electrical schemes of the joint are introduced. Finally, a simple and reliable estimation procedure has been established for obtaining joint parameters, to ascertain the integrity of the proposed model.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmadian, M. 1987. Kinematic modeling and positional error analysis of flexible gears. Clemson University Research Report, grant RI-A-86-8.

Armstrong-Helouvry, B. 1991. Control of Machines with Friction. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.

Dudley, D. W. (ed.) 1962. Gear Handbook: The Design, Manufacture, and Application of Gears. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Good, N.C. , Sweet, L.M. , and Strobel, K.L. 1985. Dynamic models for control system design of integrated robots and drive systems. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 107:53-59.

Harmonic Drive. 1990. CUP and PANCAKE Component Gear Sets. Quincy, MA: Quincy Technologies, Inc.

Hashimoto, M. 1989. Robot motion control based on joint torque sensing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE , pp. 256-261.

Hashimoto, M. , Kiyosawa, Y. , and Paul, R.P. 1993. A torque sensing technique for robots with harmonic drives . IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat. 9(1):108-116.

HD Systems, Inc. 1990. Harmonic Drive Gearing, CUP Type HDUC and HIUC Component Sets. New York.

HD Systems, Inc. 1992. Harmonic Drive Gearing, The New CSF Series. New York.

10.

Hidaka, T. , et al. 1990. Vibration of a strain-wave gearing in an industrial robot. Proceedings of the 1990 International Power Transmission and Gearing Conference. New York: ASME, pp. 789-794.

11.

Hogan, N. , Rasolee, B.A. , and Andary, J. 1991. Impedance control of robots with harmonic drive systems . Proceedings of the 1991 American Control Conference . Boston, MA: American Control Council , pp. 398-402.

12.

Hsia, L.M. 1988. The analysis and design of harmonic gear drives. Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 1. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE, pp. 616-619.

13.

Hui, R. , et al. 1993. Design of the IRIS facility—a modular, reconfigurable and expandable robot test bed. Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation . Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE, pp. 155-160.

14.

Jia, S. 1993. Model identification of a reconfigurable robot manipulator. M.A.Sc. Thesis, University of Toronto, Department of Mechanical Engineering.

15.

Karlen, J.P. , et al. 1990. A dual-arm dexterous manipulator system with anthropomorphic kinematics. Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE, pp. 368-373.

16.

Kircanski, N. 1993. IRIS grasping and manipulation facility—performance evaluation, modeling and identification. Internal Report. Robotics and Automation Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Toronto.

17.

Kircanski, N. , et al. 1994. Real-time computational aspects of multiple manipulator systems. J. Intell. Robot. Sys.: Theory Applications . 9(2):101-120.

18.

Kiyosawa, Y. , Sasahara, M. , and Ishikawa, S. 1989. Performance of a strain wave gearing using a new tooth profile. Proceedings of the 1989 International Power Transmission and Gearing Conference. New York: ASME, pp. 607-612.

19.

Ljung, L. 1987. System Identification: Theory for the User. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

20.

Margulis, M.V. , and Volkov, D.P. 1987. Calculation of the torsional rigidity of a harmonic power drive with a disc generator. Soviet Engineering Research 7(6):17-19.

21.

Nye, T.W. and Kraml, R.P. 1991. Harmonic drive gear error: characterization and compensation for precision pointing and tracking. Proceedings of the 25th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium. New York: ASME, pp. 237-252.

22.

Oei, P.D. 1991. Transfer of electrical power across a rotating joint using harmonic drive principles. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Pennsylvania, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Science.

23.

Schempf, H. , and Yoerger, D.R. 1993. Study of dominant performance characteristics in robot transmissions. J. Mech. Design, Trans. ASME 115:472-482.

24.

Tuttle, T.D. 1992. Understanding and modeling the behavior of a harmonic drive gear transmission. M.Sc. Thesis; also Technical Report 1365, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.

25.

Tuttle, T.D. , and Seering, W. 1993. Modeling a harmonic drive gear transmission. Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE , pp. 624-629.

26.

Yanabe, S. , et al. 1989. Torsional stiffness of harmonic drive reducers . Trans. Japan Soc. Mechanic. Eng., part C. 55(509):216-221 (in Japanese).

27.

Zhao, Z.Y. , Sagara, S. , and Wada, K. 1992. A new bias-compensating least-squares method for continuous system identification in the presence of colored noise. Int. J. Control 56(6):1441-1452.