Nine survivors of Hurricane Katrina, who were residents in two Red Cross shelters, provided the researchers with a total of 90 Polaroid photographs of their lives in their respective disaster shelters. After they completed the photographic activity, they participated in semi-structured interviews about their individual photos. The following research questions were addressed to discover the emic (insider) perspectives of the shelter residents: a) what features of shelter life did the residents photograph and discuss; and b) what needs were evident in their photos and interviews? The results showed that the residents had particular needs related to a) privacy, b) interpersonal relationships, c) security, and d) outreach. The discussion covers recommendations for using visual research methodologies to understand the needs of shelter residents and suggests practical implications for shelter managers and other professionals serving those displaced by disaster.
AmmermanMary S., and FryrearJerry L. 1975. “Photographic Enhancement of Children's Self-Esteem.” Psychology in the Schools12(3): 319–325.
2.
BlinnLynn M.1987. “Phototherapeutic Intervention to Prevent Pregnancies Among Adolescents.” Family Relations36(3): 252–258.
3.
BlinnLynn. 1988. “The Family Photo Assessment Process (FPAP): A Method of Validating Cross- Cultural Comparisons of Family Social Identities.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies19(1): 17–35.
4.
BlinnLynn, and HarristAmanda W.. 1991. “Combining Native Instant Photography and Photo-Elicitation.” Visual Anthropology4(2): 175–192.
5.
BolinRobert C., and StanfordLois. 1990. “Shelter and Housing Issues in Santa Cruz County.” Pp. 98–108 in The Loma Prieta Earthquake: Studies of short-term impacts, edited by BolinR.. Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center.
6.
BossPauline. 1999. Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BossPauline. 2006. Loss, Trauma, and Resilience: Therapeutic Work with Ambiguous Loss.New York: Norton.
8.
BunsterXimena. 1977. “Talking Pictures: Field Method and Visual Mode.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society3(1): 278–293.
9.
BurtonLinda M., WinnDonna-Marie, StevensonHoward, and ClarkSherri L.. 2004. “Working with African American Clients: Considering the “Homeplace” in Marriage and Family Therapy Practice.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy30(4): 397–410.
10.
CollierJohn. 1967. Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11.
CollierJohn, and CollierMalcolm. 1986. Visual Anthropology Photography as a Research Method.Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
12.
EnarsonElaine. 1999. “Violence Against Women in Disasters: A Study of Domestic Violence Programs in the US and Canada.” Violence Against Women5(7): 742–768.
13.
ErlandsonDavid A., and HarrisEdward L., and SkipperBarbara, and AllenSteven. 1998. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
FryrearJerry L., and NuellLeon, and WhitePamela. 1977. “Enhancement of Male Juvenile Delinquents’ Self-Concepts through Photographed Social Interactions.” Journal of Clinical Psychology33(3): 833–838.
15.
FulliloveMindy T.1996. “Psychiatric Implications of Displacement: Contributions from the Psychology of Place.” American Journal of Psychiatry153(12): 1516–1523.
16.
GradyJohn. 2001. “Sociology's New Workshop: The Visual Challenge to Sociology.” Sociological Imagination38(1/2): 4–6.
17.
HaradaTakashi. 2000. “Space, Materials, and the “Social”: In the Aftermath of a Disaster.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18(2): 205–212.
18.
HarveyJohn H, and SteinShelley K., and OlsenNils, and RobertsRichard J.1995. “Narratives of Loss and Recovery from a Natural Disaster.” Journal of Social Behavior & Personality10(2): 313–330.
19.
HummonDavid. 1986. “Place Identities: Localities of the Self.” Pp. 34–37 in Purposes in Built Form and Culture Research, edited by CarswellJ., and SaileD.. Proceedings of the 1986 International Conference on Built Form and Culture Research, University of Kansas Press.
20.
HummonDavid. 1990. Commonplaces: Community Ideology and Identity in American Culture.New York: SUNY Press.
21.
JencsonLinda. 2001. “Disastrous Rites: Liminality and Communitas in a Flood Crisis: Anthropology and Humanism26(1): 46–58.
22.
LindellMichael K, and PerryRon. 2004. Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
LoperAnn B., and GildeaJennifer W.. 2004. “Social Support and Anger Expression Among Incarcerated Women.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation38(4): 27–50.
24.
McCoinJohn M.1985. “Evolution of Adult Foster Care.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare12(2): 392–412.
25.
MilfordSarah A., and FryrearJerry L., and SwankPaul. 1983. “Photography with Disadvantaged Boys.” Arts in Psychotherapy10(4): 221–228.
26.
NewmanEvelyn S., and ShermanSusan R.. 1980. “Foster-Family Care for the Elderly: Surrogate Family or Mini-Institution?” International Journal of Aging and Human Development10(2): 165–176.
27.
NiggJoanne M., and BarnshawJohn, and TorresManuel R.. 2006. “Hurricane Katrina and the Flooding of New Orleans: Emergent Issues in Sheltering and Temporary Housing.” Annals, AAPSS604(March): 113–128.
28.
Oliver-SmithAnthony. 1999. “The Brotherhood of Pain: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Post-Disaster Solidarity.” Pp. 156–172 in The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective, edited by Oliver-SmithA., & HoffmanS. A.. New York: Routledge.
29.
OlsonBradley D., and CurtisCarmen E., JasonLeanord A.2003. “Physical and Sexual Trauma, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Sense of Community Among Women in Recovery: Toward a New Model of Shelter Aftercare.” Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community26(1): 67–80.
30.
PhillipsBrenda. 1995. “Creating, Sustaining and Losing Place: Homelessness in the Context of Disaster.” Humanity and Society, 19(4): 94–101.
31.
PhillipsBrenda D.1993. “Cultural Diversity in Disaster.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters11(1): 99–110.
32.
QuarantelliEnrico L.1982. “General and Particular Observations on Sheltering and Housing after American Disasters.” Disasters6(3): 277–281.
33.
QuarantelliEnrico L.2005. “Catastrophes are different from disasters: some implications for crisis managing and planning after Katrina.” Accessed October 12, 2006 at http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/.
34.
SucharCharles S.1989. “The Sociological Imagination and Documentary Still Photography: The Interrogatory Stance.” Pp. 51–63 in Eyes Across the Water: The Amsterdam Conference on Visual Anthropology and Sociology edited by FlaesR. B.. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
35.
TeckenbergWolfgang. 1982. “Bildwirklichkeit und Soziale Wlrklichkeit: der Einsatz von Fotos in der Sociologie j [Photo Reality and Social Reality: The Use of Photography in Sociology].” Soziale Welt33(2): 169–207.
36.
TierneyKathleen, and LindellMichael, and PerryRon. 2001. Facing the Unexpected.Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.
37.
TierneyKathleen, and BaisdenBarbara. 1979. Crisis Intervention Programs for Disaster Victims: a Sourcebook and Manual for Smaller Communities.Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
38.
TurnerRalph H.1967. “Types of Solidarity in the Reconstituting of Groups.” Pacific Sociological Review10(2): 60–69.
39.
TurnerRalph H.1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure.Chicago: Aldine.
40.
WhitmanCraig. 1995. “Residential Care and Treatment for Abused Women and Children.” Adult Residential Care Journal9(1): 23–34.
41.
WorthSol, and AdairJohn. 1972. Through Navajo Eyes.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
42.
YelvingtonKevin. 1997. “Coping in a Temporary Way: the Tent Cities.” Pp. 92–115 in Hurricane Andrew, edited by PeacockWalter Gillis, and MorrowBetty Hearn, and GladwinHugh. London: Routledge.
43.
ZillerRobert C., and VernHerman, and de SantoraChristine. 1988. “The Psychological Niche of Children of Poverty or Affluence through Auto-Photography.” Children's Environment Quarterly5(2): 34–40.
44.
ZillerRobert C.2000. “Self-Counseling through Re-Authored Photo-Self-Narratives.” Counseling Psychology Quarterly13(3): 265–278.
