Disaster town watching comprises a participatory technique by a community to observe, identify, understand, and build resilience to natural or human-induced hazards. Participants walk through their communities, taking notes and imagery for subsequent participatory risk mapping exercises. The goal is to develop a more nuanced and contextualized understanding of the community's state of disaster risk management. This article explores the integration of drones in the acquisition of imagery for disaster town watching. It followed standard practices for conducting disaster town watching research in a community in the Philippines. However, in addition to standard walking teams, one team learned to pilot drone missions, take aerial images, and then interpret them. The imagery they produced elicited more spatially significant relationships between and across features and locations in the community. The types of local knowledge identified differed significantly from that taken from images produced with cellular phones or Google Earth. This study revealed that drone imagery can provide new insights into local knowledge on hazards, vulnerability, and resources and the enhancement of social, economic, and environmental resilience it engenders. Participants build greater confidence in their ability to determine self-help solutions and mutual help countermeasures for enhancing disaster preparedness and community resilience against disaster.
AswaniS.DiedrichA.CurrierK.. 2015. “Planning for the Future: Mapping Anticipated Environmental and Social Impacts in a Nascent Tourism Destination.” Society & Natural Resources28 (7): 703–719. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/08941920.2015.1020582.
2.
BrownG.RhodesJ.DadeM.. 2018. “An Evaluation of Participatory Mapping Methods to Assess Urban Park Benefits.” Landscape and Urban Planning178: 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.018
3.
ChambersR.2006. “Participatory Mapping and Geographic Information Systems: Whose Map? Who Is Empowered and Who Disempowered? Who Gains and Who Loses?” EJISDC25 (2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00163.x
4.
City Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (CDRRMC) of Tuguegarao. 2016. Terminal Report on Typhoon Lawin. Tuguegarao City: Self-published.
5.
CochraneL.CorbettJ.. 2018. “Participatory Mapping.” In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change, edited by ServaesJ., 1–9. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8_6-1.
6.
Colloredo-MansfeldM.LasoF.Arce-NazarioJ.. 2020. “Drone-Based Participatory Mapping: Examining Local Agriculture Knowledge in the Galapagos.” Drones4 (4): 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4040062.
7.
CummingsA.CummingsG.HamerE.MosesP.NormanZ.CaptainV.BentoR.ButlerK.. 2017. “Developing a Drone-Based Monitoring Program with Indigenous Peoples.” Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems5 (4): 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2016-0022.
8.
DeLoic LeGaillardJ.GampellA.LoodinN.CadagJ.. 2020. “Participatory Mapping 2.0: New Ways for Children's Participation in Disaster Risk Reduction.” Australian Journal of Emergency Management35 (2): 34–42.
9.
FagerholmN.RaymondC.OlafssonA.BrownG.RinneT.HasanzadehK.BrobergA.KyttaM.. 2021. “A Methodological Framework for Analysis of Participatory Mapping Data in Research, Planning, and Management.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science35 (9): 1848–1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1869747.
10.
GannabanM.AquinoI.LemmaoA.BanguilanJ.BusligR.. 2018. “The Compliance of Tuguegarao City in the Disaster Risk Reduction Management Law.” International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences7 (2): 219–233.
11.
GrenzdörfferG.EngelA.TeichertB.. 2008. “The Photogrammetric Potential of Low-Cost Drones in Forestry and Agriculture.” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences31: 1207–1214.
12.
HallO.DahlinS.MarstorpH.Archila BustosM.ÖborI.JirströmM.. 2018. “Classification of Maize in Complex Smallholder Farming Systems Using Drone Imagery.” Drones2 (3): 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones2030022.
13.
HolnessC.MatthewsT.SatchellK.SwindellE.. 2016. “Remote Sensing Archeological Sites Through Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Imaging.” 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 6695–6698.
14.
LarrainA.McCallM.. 2019. “Participatory Mapping and Participatory GIS for Historical and Archaeological Landscape Studies: A Critical Review.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory26 (2): 643–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-018-9385-z.
15.
LechnerA.VerbruggeL.ChelliahA.AngM.RaymondC.. 2020. “Rethinking Tourism Conflict Potential Within and Between Groups Using Participatory Mapping.” Landscape and Urban Planning203: 103902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103902.
16.
LiQ.DelibertyT.. 2022. “Integrating Drones, Participatory Mapping and GIS to Enhance Resiliency for Remote Villages.” Transactions in GIS26 (2): 818–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12886.
17.
MerkertR.BushellJ.. 2020. “Managing the Drone Revolution: A Systematic Literature Review into the Current Use of Airborne Drones and Future Strategic Directions for Their Effective Control.” Journal of Air Transportation Management89: 101929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101929.
18.
MulyasariF.TakeuchiY.ShawR.. 2009. “Chapter 7: Implementation Tools for Disaster Education.” In Urban Risk Reduction: An Asian Perspective (Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management, edited by ShawR.SrinivasH.SharmaA.. Vol. 1, 137–151. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-7262(2009)0000001014.
OgawaY.FernandezA.YoshimuraT.. 2005. “Town Watching as a Tool for Citizen Participation in Developing Countries: Applications in Disaster Training.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters23 (2): 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072700502300201.
21.
Paneque-GálvezJ.Vargas-RamírezN.NapoletanoB.CummingsA.. 2017. “Grassroots Innovation Using Drones for Indigenous Mapping and Monitoring.” Land6 (4): 86. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3390/land6040086.
SariS.KhatimahK.. 2015. “The Application of School Watching Method to Increase the Earthquake Disaster Preparedness of Primary School Students.” Journal of Education and Learning9 (3): 241–245.
28.
SharifahM.SyedD.MohdY.ChongH.LayK.MansharanS.MohdM.HapizahN.. 2022. “Applications of Drone in Disaster Management: A Scoping Review.” Science & Justice62 (1): 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.11.002.
29.
ShawR.TakeuchiY.. 2009. Town Watching Handbook for Disaster Education. Geneva: UNISDR.
30.
SieberR.2006. “Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers96 (3): 491–507.
31.
Tuguegarao City Government. 2021. Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan. City Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office. Self-published. Tuguegarao City, Philippines.
YoshidaY.TakeuchiY.ShawR.. 2009. “Chapter 10: Town Watching as a Useful Tool in Urban Risk Reduction in Saijo.” In Urban Risk Reduction: An Asian Perspective (Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management), edited by ShawR.SrinivasH.SharmaA.. Vol. 1, 189–205. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-7262(2009)0000001014.
