Effect of induction chemotherapy on the quality-of-life in patients with advanced stage tongue cancer by a prospective study

Abstract

Abstracts

Objective

To assess how induction chemotherapy affects the quality-of-life (QoL) in patients with advanced tongue cancer.

Methods

This prospective study included patients who were diagnosed with advanced tongue cancer. Each patient was asked to complete the University of Washington QoL (UW-QoL), version 4, questionnaire preoperatively and at 12 months after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not they received induction chemotherapy.

Results

Of the 192 patients included in the analysis, 145 patients had received induction chemotherapy. There were no significant differences regarding age, sex, tumour stage, node stage, flap reconstruction, tumour resection range and radiotherapy between the two groups. The mean total hospital cost was significantly higher in patients who underwent induction chemotherapy compared with those who did not (68 000 versus 44 000 Yuan Renminbi, respectively). The two groups had similar pre-treatment and post-treatment composite QoL scores and in the 12 individual domains.

Conclusion

Induction chemotherapy had a limited effect on postoperative QoL in patients with advanced tongue cancers, but it cost significantly more to administer.

Keywords

Induction chemotherapy quality-of-life advanced tongue cancer chemotherapy

Introduction

The tongue plays a key role in swallowing and speech, so any surgical resection of the tongue tissues might cause functional deficits. Unfortunately, tongue cancer is the most common malignant tumour in the oral cavity and surgical therapy is the main treatment.^1,2 However, the prognosis of advanced stage tongue cancer remains unfavourable.^1,2 Therefore, multi-treatment approaches are required in patients with advanced disease in order to achieve better local regional control and improve the disease-specific survival rate.

Induction chemotherapy has been widely used in patients with advanced head and neck cancer, although controversy exists regarding whether it provides a prognostic advantage.^3–7 Due to the development of the concept of functional surgery, satisfactory oncological outcome as well as good postoperative quality-of-life (QoL) are equally important. However, to the best of our knowledge, no authors have tried to evaluate how induction chemotherapy affects the QoL in patients with tongue cancer. Therefore, the current study aimed to answer this question.

Patients and methods

Patient population

This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients who were diagnosed with advanced tongue cancer (T3T4M0) according to the Union for International Cancer Control 2010 classification system⁸ in the Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China between January 2011 and December 2016. All patients had no impairments in communication.

In the Department of Stomatology, these patients were routinely treated with a first cycle of induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel and cisplatin) and then their response to the chemotherapy was evaluated. If the patient had a good response (i.e. complete response or partial response), then a second cycle of induction chemotherapy was performed followed by surgical resection and radiotherapy. If their response to induction chemotherapy was unsatisfactory (i.e. no significant change or disease progression) then they received surgical treatment directly. Some patients refused to receive the induction chemotherapy due to the associated complications. The cohort of patients was divided on the basis of whether the patient received induction chemotherapy. Patients who had just received one cycle of induction chemotherapy were excluded from the study.

All patients were required to complete the University of Washington QoL (UW-QoL), version 4, questionnaire⁹ preoperatively and at 12 months after surgery by themselves or with the help of a healthcare professional. Information including age, sex, total hospital cost, and tumour stage were obtained and analysed.

The Institutional Research Committee of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China approved the study (no. ZZC201034512) and all participants provided written informed consent.

UW-QoL questionnaire

The UW-QoL questionnaire has been shown to be valid and reliable.^10–14 It consists of 12 single-question domains each of which has three to six response options, which are scaled in equal stages from 0 (worst possible response) to 100 (best possible response). The domains were pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, taste, saliva, mood, and anxiety. The individual domains were scored according to the UW-QoL guidelines.⁹

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS^® statistical package, version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows^®. Student’s t-test and χ²-test were used to evaluate the significance of any differences in the clinical and demographic characteristics between the two groups. The nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test was used to analyse the UW-QoL scores. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 263 patients were enrolled at the beginning of the study and completed the questionnaire, but 33 patients had a poor response to the first cycle of induction chemotherapy and were excluded from the study. Of the 230 patients who were included, 29 patients died of the disease within 1 year after surgery and nine patients were lost to follow-up. Therefore, the analyses included 192 patients (117 male and 75 female). The mean ± SD age of the patients was 60.3 ± 8.8 years (range 36–79 years). All patients had a T3/T4 tongue squamous cell carcinoma, and 71 (37.0%) patients had cervical node metastases. Hemiglossectomy and total glossectomy were performed in 96 and 18 patients, respectively. A total of 131 patients received a free-flap reconstruction, which included 81 anterolateral thigh flaps and 50 radial forearm flaps. A total of 35 patients had received modified radical neck dissection. A total of 152 patients received postoperative radiotherapy within 6 weeks after the operation.

Of the 192 patients, 145 received induction chemotherapy and 47 patients did not. There were no significant differences regarding age, sex, tumour stage, node stage, flap reconstruction, tumour resection range, and radiotherapy between the two groups (Table 1). The mean total hospital cost was significantly higher in the patients who underwent induction chemotherapy compared with those who did not (68 000 versus 44 000 Yuan Renminbi, respectively; P < 0.001).

Table 1.

Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with advanced tongue cancer who did or did not receive induction chemotherapy (IC).

Characteristic	Patients who received ICn = 145	Patients who did not receive ICn = 47
Age, years
<55	42	11
≥55	103	36
Sex
Male	93	24
Female	52	23
Tumour stage
T3	85	30
T4	60	17
Node stage
N0	90	31
N+	55	16
Tumour resection range
Partial glossectomy	27	13
Hemiglossectomy	69	27
Subtotal glossectomy	33	5
Total glossectomy	16	2
Neck dissection
Selective	120	37
Modified radical	25	10
Hospital cost, Yuan Renminbi	68 000	44 000*
Flap reconstruction
Free flap	99	32
Not or none	46	15
Radiotherapy
Yes	113	39
No	32	8

Data presented as mean or n of patients.

*P < 0.001 compared with the IC group; all other comparisons between the two groups were not significant (P ≥ 0.05); continuous data were compared using Student’s t-test and categorical data were compared using χ²-test.

Table 2 presents the pre-treatment composite quality-of-life scores for patients who did and did not receive induction chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the composite scores or the scores for the 12 individual domains between the two groups.

Table 2.

Comparison of the pre-treatment quality-of-life scores of patients with advanced tongue cancer who did or did not receive induction chemotherapy (IC).

Questionnaire domain	Patients who received ICn = 145	Patients who did not receive ICn = 47
Pain	74.5±13.8	69.8±20.7
Appearance	89.5±10.4	94.4±20.5
Activity	94.5±18.3	95.1±21.8
Recreation	91.9±11.1	92.0±13.8
Swallowing	85.8±29.0	89.3±23.8
Chewing	86.3±20.1	84.9±23.7
Speech	96.4±9.4	97.1±8.8
Shoulder	95.4±7.3	96.1±10.1
Taste	94.7±8.5	93.1±9.1
Saliva	100.0±0.0	100±0.0
Mood	90.4±12.1	91.1±13.1
Anxiety	95.3±9.5	96.2±11.8
Composite score	91.4±12.5	91.9±14.7

Data presented as mean ± SD.

No significant between-group differences (P ≥ 0.05); Mann–Whitney U-test.

Table 3 presents the post-treatment composite quality-of-life scores for patients who did and did not receive induction chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the composite scores or the scores for the 12 individual domains between the two groups.

Table 3.

Comparison of the post-treatment quality-of-life scores of patients with advanced tongue cancer who did or did not receive induction chemotherapy (IC).

Questionnaire domain	Patients who received ICn = 145	Patients who did not receive ICn = 47
Pain	94.4±13.3	90.1±16.0
Appearance	85.6±15.8	79.8±24.1
Activity	64.4±20.1	57.3±19.9
Recreation	65.7±18.8	69.3±20.0
Swallowing	47.6±22.5	44.4±17.9
Chewing	69.4±25.6	67.9±23.1
Speech	69.3±22.9	70.4±18.8
Shoulder	83.1±16.9	79.9±17.2
Taste	61.1±20.0	64.1±21.4
Saliva	66.2±13.5	69.1±20.8
Mood	76.3±16.3	72.9±21.3
Anxiety	70.3±18.5	73±24.6
Composite score	71.0±18.7	69.4±20.5

Data presented as mean ± SD.

No significant between-group differences (P ≥ 0.05); Mann–Whitney U-test.

Discussion

The role of induction chemotherapy in terms of providing benefits to patients with head and neck cancers remains unclear.^3–7 In a previous study,³ 8031 patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (T4 or N2b to N3) undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy were divided into concurrent chemotherapy and induction chemotherapy cohorts; and no significant survival advantage was noted in patients receiving induction chemotherapy, but they tended to receive lower radiotherapy doses. Similarly, a randomized phase III trial failed to show any survival advantage by using induction chemotherapy in patients with unresectable head neck cancers.¹⁵ However, in an Italian randomized trial of 421 patients, compared with those treated with locoregional therapy alone without compromising treatment compliance, increased rates of treatment response, overall survival, and progression-free survival were observed in patients with induction chemotherapy.¹⁶ Each of these international trials may be statistically underpowered, highlighting the need for studies with larger sample sizes.

Functional outcomes and oncological results are equally important, because a good postoperative QoL could help cancer survivors regain their normal social life. However, no authors have tried to assess the role of induction chemotherapy in affecting the QoL. A previous study focused on evaluating speech and swallowing ability in 15 patients enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection.¹⁷ The authors concluded that induction chemotherapy had a negligible effect on speech and swallowing physiology, but might provide symptomatic improvement of pain and swallowing after treatment.¹⁷ Similar results were also reported by a pilot study in patients with head and neck cancer.¹⁸ However, both of these studies had a relatively small sample size and only analysed the immediate influence on outcomes.^17,18 Treatment of head and neck cancers usually consists of multiple procedures and long-term functional results are also important.

The current study is the first to report that induction chemotherapy does not appear to help the recovery of the composite QoL score. In contrast, a previous study reported that patients with T4 laryngeal cancer treated with induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy were able to return to, and in many patients exceed, pre-treatment performance and QoL.¹⁹ The difference between these findings might be explained by the fact that, unlike the patients in the current study, those patients were treated using organ-sparing approaches without surgical resection.¹⁹ Previous research has reported that patients with more advanced tumour stages were less likely to have worsened swallowing and more likely to have improved swallowing.²⁰

Restoration of swallowing and speech ability are the main goals of treating tongue cancers. Although the extent of the resection range that was performed in the present study was based on pre-treatment lesion size, it was anticipated that the actual resection range might be smaller than the expected resection range due to tumour shrinkage induced by chemotherapy, which would result in the preservation of more tongue tissue and better post-treatment QoL. However, the present findings showed that the two groups of patients had similar tumour resection ranges. Also, the swallowing, speech and chewing abilities did not differ significantly between the two groups post-treatment. Therefore, limited functional advantages were achieved by induction chemotherapy. No related literature was available for comparison. More studies are needed to address this issue.

The only significant difference between the two groups was that it cost more to treat patients who underwent induction chemotherapy compared with those who did not. One cycle of induction chemotherapy usually costs approximately 10 000 Yuan Renminbi in our hospital, but this finding might be variable owing to different medical insurance policies in different countries.

In conclusion, induction chemotherapy had a limited role in affecting postoperative QoL in patients with advanced tongue cancers, but it costs significantly more to administer.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Fang

Shi

Liu

et al . Tongue squamous cell carcinoma as a possible distinct entity in patients under 40 years old. Oncol Lett 2014; 7: 2099–2102.

Fang

Shi

Liu

et al . Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in ever smokers: a matched-pair analysis of survival. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25: 934–937.

Stokes

Amini

Jones

et al . Survival impact of induction chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis. Head Neck 2017; 39: 1113–1121.

van Herpen

Mauer

Mesia

et al . Short-term health-related quality of life and symptom control with docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (TPF), 5-fluorouracil (PF) for induction in unresectable locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer patients (EORTC 24971/TAX 323). Br J Cancer 2010; 103: 1173–1181.

Chapman

Parvathaneni

and Yom

SS.

Revisiting induction chemotherapy before radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, part II: nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Future Oncol 2017; 13: 581–584.

DE Felice

Abate

Galdieri

et al . Impact of induction chemotherapy in locally advanced HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer. A propensity score-matched analysis. Anticancer Res 2016; 36: 6667–6672.

Chen

Sun

et al . Induction chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer 2016; 35: 94.

The Union of International Cancer Control (UICC). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours 8^th Edition, http://www.uicc.org/resources/tnm (2016, accessed 4 September 2017).

University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL v4). Guidance for scoring and presentation. http://www.headandneckcancer.co.uk/File.ashx?id=10285 (2012, accessed 4 September 2017).

10.

Fang

Shi

et al . Free flap reconstruction versus non-free flap reconstruction in treating elderly patients with advanced oral cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72: 1420–1424.

11.

Fang

Shi

Zhang

et al . Assessment of the quality of life of patients with oral cancer after pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction with a focus on speech. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71: 2004.e1–2004.e5.

12.

Zhang

Fang

et al . A comparison between the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap and the free anterolateral thigh perforator flap for reconstruction in head and neck cancer patients: assessment of the quality of life. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25: 868–871.

13.

Liu

et al . Vascularized free forearm flap versus free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer: assessment of quality of life. Head Neck 2013; 35: 1808–1813.

14.

Yang

et al . Assessment of quality of life of patients with oral cavity cancer who have had defects reconstructed with free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51: 497–501.

15.

Hitt

Grau

López-Pousa

et al . A randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol 2014; 25: 216–225.

16.

Caponigro

Rosati

De Rosa

et al . Cisplatin, raltitrexed, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II randomized study. Oncology 2002; 63: 232–238.

17.

Barringer

Hutcheson

Sturgis

et al . Effect of induction chemotherapy on speech and swallowing function in patients with oral tongue cancer. Head Neck 2009; 31: 611–617.

18.

Mittal

Pauloski

Rademaker

et al . Effect of induction chemotherapy on swallow physiology and saliva production in patients with head and neck cancer: a pilot study. Head Neck 2015; 37: 567–572.

19.

Mouw

Solanki

Stenson

et al . Performance and quality of life outcomes for T4 laryngeal cancer patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. Oral Oncol 2012; 48: 1025–1030.

20.

Salama

Stenson

List

et al . Characteristics associated with swallowing changes after concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134: 1060–1065.