The aim of the study was to define the role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the characterization of adnexal complex masses, with particular regard to the distinction between benign and malignant lesions. Conflicting results on this topic have emerged from studies in the last decade, with a consequent substantial limitation to the use of this relatively novel technique in clinical practice.
Methods and study design
Magnetic resonance imaging examinations performed on 91 patients with ovarian masses (56 benign, 35 malignant) were retrospectively evaluated by two observers unaware of the final histopathological diagnosis. Diffusion-weighted sequences with b values of 0, 500 and 1000 were performed in all cases, and apparent diffusion coefficient maps were automatically generated. The signals of both the cystic and solid components of the ovarian masses were evaluated on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images acquired with a b value of 1000. Apparent diffusion coefficient values were measured in all cases.
Results
With regard to the solid components, hypointensity on both the T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images has proved to be a reliable indicator of benignancy. In contrast, hyperintensity on both sequences was suggestive of malignancy. Signal intensity of the cystic components and apparent diffusion coefficient values of both components have not proven useful in characterization of the masses.
Conclusions
Only the definition of the signal intensities on diffusion-weighted images obtained with the use of high b values on the solid component of a complex adnexal mass is useful to characterize an ovarian mass as benign or malignant.
ImaokaI., WadaA., KajiY., HayashiT., HayashiM., MatsuoM., SugimuraM.: Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses.Radiographics, 26: 1431–1438, 2006.
6.
SartyG.E., KendallE.J., LoewyJ., DhirA., OlatunbosunO.A., PiersonR.A.: Magnetic resonance diffusion imaging of ovarian masses: a first experience with 12 cases.MAGMA, 16: 182–193, 2004.
7.
Thomassin-NaggaraI., FournierL.S., RousselA., MarsaultC., BazotM.: IRM de diffusion et pelvis feminin.J Radiol, 91: 431–440, 2010.
8.
Thomassin-NaggaraI., TouissantI., PerrotN., RouzierR., CuenodC.A., BazotM., DaraiE.: Characterization of complex adnexal masses: value of adding perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging.Radiology, 258: 793–803, 2011.
9.
MalayeriA., El KhouliR.H., ZaheerA., JacobsM.A., Corona-VillalobosC.P., KamelI.R., MacuraK.J.: Principles and applications of diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer detection, staging and treatment follow-up.Radiographics, 31: 1173–1191, 2011.
10.
YoshikawaT., KawamitsuH., MitchellD.G., OhnoY., KuY., SeoY., FujiiM., SugimuraK.: ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique.Am J Roentgenol, 187: 1521–1530, 2006.
11.
NakayamaT., YoshimitsuK., IrieH., AibeH., TajimaT., NishieA., AsayamaY., MatakeK., KakiharaD., MatsuuraS., NakanoH., HondaH.: Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas.J Magn Reson Imaging, 22: 271–278, 2005.
12.
NamimotoT., AwaiK., NakauraT., YanagaY., HiraiT., YamashitaY.: Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological disease.Eur Radiol, 19: 745–760, 2009.
13.
KinoshitaT., IshiiK., NaganumaH., HigashiiwaiH.: MR findings of ovarian tumors with cystic components.Br J Radiol, 73: 333–339, 2000.
14.
KierR., SmithR.C., McCarthyS.M.: Value of lipid- and water-suppression MR images in distinguishing between blood and lipid within ovarian masses.Am J Roentgenol, 158: 321–325, 1992.
15.
MoritaS., KojimaS., HirataM., SuzukiK., UenoE.: Perfusion fraction of diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting the presence of blood supply in ovarian masses.J Magn Reson Imag, 34: 1131–1136, 2011.
16.
StevensS.K., HricakH., CamposZ.: Teratomas versus cystic hemorrhagic adnexal lesions: differentiation with proton-selective fat-saturation MR imaging.Radiology, 186: 481–488, 1993.
ChillaB., HauserN., SingerG., TrippelM., FroehlichJ.M., Kubik-HuchR.A.: Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions.Eur Radiol, 21: 1301–1310, 2011.
19.
FeuerleinS., PaulsS., JuchemsM.S., StuberT., HoffmannM.H.K., BrambsH., ErnstA.S.: Pitfalls in abdominal diffusion-weighted imaging: how predictive is restricted water diffusion for malignancy.Am J Roentgenol, 193: 1970–1976, 2009.
20.
LiW., ChuC., CuiY., ZhangP., ZhuM.: Diffusion-weighted MRI: a useful technique to discriminate benign versus malignant ovarian surface epithelial tumors with solid and cystic components.Abdom Imag doi: 10.1007/s00261-011-9814-x, 2011.
21.
BakirB., BakanS., TunaciM., BakirV.L., IyibozkurtA.C., BerkmanS., BengisuE., SalmasliogluA.: Diffusion-weighted imaging of solid or predominantly solid gynaecological adnexial masses: is it useful in the differential diagnosis?Br J Radiol, 84: 600–611, 2011.
22.
TsurudaJ.S., ChewW.M., MoseleyM.E., NormanD.: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain: value of differentiating benign extraxial cysts and epidermoid tumors.Am J Roentgenol, 155: 1059–1068, 1990.
23.
WangJ., TakashimaS., TakayamaF., KawakamiS., SaitoA., MatsushitaT., MomoseM., IshiyamaT.: Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging.Radiology, 220: 621–630, 2001.
24.
PunwaniS.: Diffusion weighted imaging of female pelvic cancers: concepts and clinical applications.Eur J Radiol, 78: 21–29, 2011.
25.
LevyA., MedjhoulA., CaramellaC., ZareskiE., BergesO., ChargariC., BouletB., BidaultF., DromainC., BalleyguierC.: Interest of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in gynecological malignancies: a review.J Magn Reson Imag, 33: 1020–1027, 2011.
26.
WhittakerC.S., CoadyA., CulverL., RustinG., PadwickM., PadhaniA.R.: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of female pelvic tumors: a pictorial review.Radiographics, 29: 759–778, 2009.
27.
SohaibS.A., SahdevA., Van TrappernP., JacobsI.J., ReznekR.H.: Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging.Am J Roentgenol, 180: 1297–1304, 2003.
Thomassin-NaggaraI., DaraiE., CuenodC.A., FournierL., ToussaintI., MarsaultC., BazotM.: Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses.Eur Radiol, 19: 1544–1552, 2009.
30.
SalaE., RockallA., RangarajanD., Kubik-HuchR.A.: The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis.Eur J Radiol, 76: 367–385, 2010.
31.
TroianoR.N., LazzariniK.M., ScouttL.M., LangeR.C., FlynnS.D., McCarthyS.: Fibroma and fibrotechoma of the ovary: MR imaging findings.Radiology, 204: 795–798, 2010.
KatayamaM., MasuiT., KobayashiS., ItoT., SakaharaH., NozakiA., KabasawaH.: Diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging of ovarian tumors: is it useful to measure apparent diffusion coefficients?J Comput Assist Tomogr, 26: 250–256, 2002.
34.
FujiiS., KakiteS., NishiharaK., KanasakiY.: Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions.J Magn Reson Imag, 28: 1149–1156, 2008.
35.
MotekiT., IshizakaH.: Evaluation of cystic ovarian lesions using apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from reordered turboflash MR images.Magn Reson Imaging, 17: 955–963, 1999.
36.
MotekiT., IshizakaH.: Diffusion-weighted EPI of cystic ovarian lesions: evaluation of cystic contents using apparent diffusion coefficients.J Magn Reson Imaging, 12: 1014–1019, 2000.
37.
MotekiT., HorikoshiH., EndoK.: Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in endometrial and other pelvic cysts.Magn Reson Imaging, 20: 463–470, 2002.
38.
MaldjianJ.A., ListerudJ., MoonisG., SidiqiF.: Computing diffusion rates in T2-dark hematoma and areas of low T2 signal.Am J Neuroradiol, 22: 112–118, 2001.
