Patients with cervical cancer report experiencing physical, psychological, economic, and social problems daily. An exploration of supportive care needs is important for patients and their families to cope with diagnosis, treatment, recovery or even death.
Objective:
This study explores the perceived supportive care needs of Nepali patients with cervical cancer who are undergoing cancer treatment.
Methods:
A descriptive qualitative research design was utilized with semi-structured interviews to probe patients with cervical cancer’s supportive care needs. The study was conducted at a cancer-specific hospital in Nepal. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 30 patients with cervical cancer. Qualitative thematic analysis techniques were employed to identify the supportive care needs of Nepalese patients with cervical cancer.
Results:
Supportive care needs were identified with five main themes and sixteen sub-themes: 1) psychological trauma (regret on delaying medical consultation, fear of disease, death and dying, ambivalence about the future and treatment, feeling of loss, caring/rearing of children, feeling and burden to partner/family); 2) financial distress (loss of income and challenges with treatment costs); 3) sexual disharmony; 4) physical dependency on others for day-to-day care and; 5) hunger for information (cause of disease, prognosis of disease, dietary counseling, and information on sexuality).
Conclusion:
Recognizing the supportive care needs of patients with cervical cancer during treatment by health care professional and family members is vital to facilitate optimal care at the hospital and home for overall improvement in the patient’s quality of life. Acknowledgment that the expensive treatment regime creates an economic and psychological burden for the patients.
BrayFFerlayJSoerjomataramI, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin2018; 68: 394–424.
2.
TorreLAIslamiFSiegelRL, et al. Global cancer in women: Burden and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2017; 26: 444–57.
3.
ZhangXZengQCaiW, et al. Trends of cervical cancer at global, regional, and national level: data from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019. BMC Public Health2021; 21: 1–10.
4.
ArbynMWeiderpassEBruniL, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Heal2020; 8: e191–203.
5.
StelzleDTanakaLFLeeKK, et al. Estimates of the global burden of cervical cancer associated with HIV. Lancet Glob Heal2021; 9: e161–9.
KhatiwodaSRDhunganaRRSapkotaVP. Estimating the direct cost of cancer in Nepal : A cross-sectional study in a tertiary cancer hospital. Front Public Heal2019; 7: 1–8.
11.
GyawaliBSharmaSShilpakarR, et al. Overview of delivery of cancer care in Nepal: Current status and future priorities. JCO Glob Oncol2020; 6: 1211–1217.
12.
GautamDAdhikariS. Palliative care services for cancer patients in Nepal, a lower-middle-income country. Palliat Care Soc Pract2021; 15: 1–8.
13.
PrintzC. Psychological stress is associated with a higher risk of cervical cancer mortality. Cancer2020; 126: 240–241.
14.
KlügelSLückeCMetaA, et al. Concomitant psychiatric symptoms and impaired quality of life in women with cervical cancer: A critical review. Int J Womens Health2017; 9: 795–805.
15.
SangYPBaeDSJooHN, et al. Quality of life and sexual problems in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer compared with the general population. Cancer2007; 110: 2716–2725.
16.
KhalilJBellefqihSSahliN, et al. Impact of cervical cancer on quality of life : beyond the short term: Results from a single institution. Gynecol Oncol Res Pract2015; 2: 1–6.
17.
ConwayJLFelderSTangJ, et al. Long-term patient-reported distress in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol2020; 23: 1–8.
18.
CullACowieVJFarquharsonDIM, et al. Early stage cervical cancer: psychosocial and sexual outcomes of treatment. Br J Cancer1993; 68: 1216–20.
19.
FitchMI. Supportive care framework. Can Oncol Nurs J2008; 18: 6–24.
20.
ArandaSSchofieldPWeihL, et al. Mapping the quality of life and unmet needs of urban women with metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)2005; 14: 211–222.
21.
FitchMMaamounJ. Unmet supportive care needs and desire for assistance in patients receiving radiation treatment: Implications for oncology nursing. Can Oncol Nurs J2016; 26: 53–59.
22.
BrownNMKLuiCWRobinsonPC, et al. Supportive care needs and preferences of lung cancer patients: a semi-structured qualitative interview study. Support Care Cancer2015; 23: 1533–1539.
23.
RahmanMS. The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: a literature review. J Educ Learn2016; 6: 102–112.
24.
WilliamsNGriffinGFarrellV, et al. Gaining insight into the supportive care needs of women experiencing gynaecological cancer: A qualitative study. J Clin Nurs2020; 29: 1684–1694.
25.
WalshSJonesMBressingtonD, et al. Adherence to COREQ reporting guidelines for qualitative research: a scientometric study in nursing social science. Int J Qual Methods2020; 19: 1–9.
26.
HannesKHeyvaertMSlegersK, et al. Exploring the potential for a consolidated standard for reporting guidelines for qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods2015; 14: 160940691561152.
27.
ZengYChengASKLiuX, et al. Cervical cancer survivors’ perceived cognitive complaints and supportive care needs in mainland China: A qualitative study. BMJ Open2017; 7: 1–8.
28.
LopezALJButowPNPhilpS, et al. Age-related supportive care needs of women with gynaecological cancer: A qualitative exploration. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)2019; 28: 1–9.
29.
DsouzaSMVyasNNarayananP, et al. A qualitative study on experiences and needs of breast cancer survivors in Karnataka, India. Clin Epidemiol Glob Heal2018; 6: 69–74.
30.
BarrettDTwycrossA. Data collection in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs2018; 21: 63–64.
31.
SandelowskiM. Focus on research methods whatever happened to qualitative description?Res Nurs Heal2000; 23: 334–340.
32.
MilesMBHubermanAM. Qualitative data analysis. In: HollandR (ed.) An Expanded Source Book, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publication, 1994, pp.1–338.
33.
AlhojailanMIIbrahimM. Thematic analysis : a critical review of its process and evaluation. WEI Int Eur Acad Proc2012; 1: 8–21.
34.
NowellLSNorrisJMWhiteDE, et al. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods2017; 16: 1–13.
35.
GaleNKHeathGCameronE, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol2013; 13: 117.
36.
Arikan DönmezAKuru AliciNBormanP. Lived experiences for supportive care needs of women with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a phenomenological study. Clin Nurs Res2021;30:799-808
37.
GuentherJStilesAChampionJD. The lived experience of ovarian cancer: A phenomenological approach. J Am Acad Nurse Pract2012; 24: 595–603.
38.
BowenGA. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qual Res2008; 8: 137–152.
39.
ChuaGPTanHK. A qualitative approach in determining the patient-centered information and supportive care needs of cancer patients in Singapore. BMJ Open2020; 10: 1–10.
40.
AfiyantiYMilantiAPutriRH. Supportive care needs in predicting the quality of life among gynecological cancer patients. Can Oncol Nurs J2018; 28: 22–29.
41.
OwengaJANyambedhaEO. Perception of cervical cancer patients on their financial challenges in western Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res2018; 18: 1–8.
42.
PitcherSFakieNAdamsT, et al. Sexuality post gynaecological cancer treatment: A qualitative study with South African women. BMJ Open2020; 10: 12–14.
43.
VermeerWMBakkerRMKenterGG, et al. Cervical cancer survivors’ and partners’ experiences with sexual dysfunction and psychosexual support. Support Care Cancer2016; 24: 1679–1687.
44.
TsaiLYWangKLLiangSY, et al. The lived experience of gynecologic cancer survivors in Taiwan. J Nurs Res2017; 25: 447–454.
