The Role of Musical Experience in Hemispheric Lateralization of Global and Local Auditory Processing

Abstract

The global precedence effect is a phenomenon in which global aspects of visual and auditory stimuli are processed before local aspects. Individuals with musical experience perform better on all aspects of auditory tasks compared with individuals with less musical experience. The hemispheric lateralization of this auditory processing is less well-defined. The present study aimed to replicate the global precedence effect with auditory stimuli and to explore the lateralization of global and local auditory processing in individuals with differing levels of musical experience. A total of 38 college students completed an auditory-directed attention task while electroencephalography was recorded. Individuals with low musical experience responded significantly faster and more accurately in global trials than in local trials regardless of condition, and significantly faster and more accurately when pitches traveled in the same direction (compatible condition) than when pitches traveled in two different directions (incompatible condition) consistent with a global precedence effect. In contrast, individuals with high musical experience showed less of a global precedence effect with regards to accuracy, but not in terms of reaction time, suggesting an increased ability to overcome global bias. Further, a difference in P300 latency between hemispheres was observed. These findings provide a preliminary neurological framework for auditory processing of individuals with differing degrees of musical experience.

Keywords

attention audition global hemispheric lateralization local musical experience P300

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altenmüller

(1989) Cortical DC-potentials as electrophysiological correlates of hemispheric dominance of higher cognitive functions. International Journal of Neuroscience 47: 1–14. doi:10.3109/00207458908987413.

Altenmüller

E. O.

(2001) How many music centers are in the brain? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 930: 273–280. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05738.x.

Alexander, J. A., Wong, P. C. M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005, January). Lexical tone perception in musicians and non-musicians. Paper presented at 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal.

Beaucousin

Simon

Cassotti

Pineau

Houdé

Poirel

(2013) Global interference during early visual processing: ERP evidence from a rapid global/local selective task. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 539. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00539.

Bouvet

Rousset

Valdois

Donnadieu

(2011) Global precedence effect in audition and vision: Evidence for similar cognitive styles across modalities. Acta Psychologica 138: 329–335. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.004.

Broca

P. P.

(1861) Remarques sur le siege de la faculte de la parole articulee, suives d’une observation d’aphemie (perte de parole) [Remarks on the seat of the faculty of articulated language, followed by an observation of aphemia (loss of speech)]. Bulletins de la Société Anatomique de Paris 36: 330–357.

Bukach

C. M.

Phillips

W. S.

Gauthier

(2010) Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72: 1865–1874. doi:10.3758/APP.72.7.1865.

Coles

M. G. H.

Rugg

M. D.

(1996) Event-related brain potentials: An introduction. In: Rugg

M. D.

Coles

M. G. H.

(eds) Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 1–26. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524168.003.0001.

Degé

Kubicek

Schwarzer

(2011) Music lessons and intelligence: A relation mediated by executive functions. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 29: 195–201. doi:10.1525/mp.2011.29.2.195.

10.

Fink

G. R.

Halligan

P. W.

Marshall

J. C.

Frith

C. D.

Frackowiak

R. S.

Dolan

R. J.

(1997) Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain 120: 1779–1791. doi:10.1093/brain/120.10.1779.

11.

Fink

G. R.

Marshall

J. C.

Halligan

P. W.

Frith

C. D.

Frackowiak

R. S. J.

Dolan

R. J.

(1997) Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: The effect of stimulus category. Proceedings of the Royal Society London [Biology] 264: 487–494. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0070.

12.

Fujioka

Ross

Kakigi

Pantev

Trainor

L. J.

(2006) One year of musical training affects development of auditory cortical-evoked fields in young children. Brain 129: 2593–2608. doi:10.1093/brain/awl247.

13.

Fujioka

Trainor

L. J.

Ross

Kakigi

Pantev

(2004) Musical training enhances automatic encoding of melodic contour and interval structure. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1010–1021. doi:10.1162/0898929041502706.

14.

Gauthier

Tarr

M. J.

(1997) Becoming a “Greeble” expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research 37: 1673–1682. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00286-6.

15.

George

E. M.

Coch

(2011) Music training and working memory: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia 49: 1083–1094. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsyhologia.2011.02.001.

16.

Gilman

A. T.

Ebbets

(2013) Musical training and auditory global-local precedence. In: Knauff

Pauen

Sebanz

Wachsmuth

(eds) Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Berlin, Germany: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2392–2397.

17.

Han

Yund

E. W.

Woods

D. L.

(2003) An ERP study of the global precedence effect: The role of spatial frequency. Clinical Neurophysiology 114: 1850–1865. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00196-2.

18.

Herholz

S. C.

Lappe

Pantev

(2009) Looking for a pattern: An MEG study on the abstract mismatch negativity in musicians and nonmusicians. BMC Neuroscience 10: 42. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-42.

19.

Jasper

H. H.

(1958) Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography: 1957. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 10: 370–375. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1.

20.

Justus

List

(2005) Auditory attention to frequency and time: An analogy to visual local-global stimuli. Cognition 98: 31–51. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.001.

21.

Kuriki

Kanda

Hirata

(2006) Effects of musical experience on different components of MEG responses elicited by sequential piano-tones and chords. Journal of Neuroscience 26: 4046–4053. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3907-05.2006.

22.

Leonard

J. A.

(1958) Partial advance information in a choice reaction time task. British Journal of Psychology 49: 89–96. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00644.x.

23.

Liu

Hsiao

J. H.

(2014) Holistic processing in speech perception: Experts’ and novices’ processing of isolated Cantonese syllables. In: Bello

Guarini

McShane

Scassellati

(eds) Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 869–874.

24.

X. S.

Zhou

B. X.

Chen

X. H.

(2005) Unilateral spatial neglect, global processing deficit and prosopagnosia following right hemisphere stroke: A case report. Chinese Medical Journal (English) 118: 1846–1848.

25.

Magliero

Bashore

T. R.

Coles

M. G. H.

Donchin

(1984) On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psychophysiology 21: 171–186. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb00201.x.

26.

Manjaly

Z. M.

Bruning

Neufang

Stephan

K. E.

Brieber

Marshall

J. C.

Fink

G. R.

(2007) Neurophysiological correlates of relatively enhanced local visual search in autistic adolescents. NeuroImage 35: 283–291. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.036.

27.

Martinez

Moses

Frank

Buxton

Wong

Stiles

(1997) Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI. NeuroReport 8: 1685–1689. doi:10.1097/00001756-199705060-00025.

28.

Navon

(1977) Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 9: 353–383. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3.

29.

Navon

(1981) The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research 43: 1–32. doi:10.1007/BF00309635.

30.

NCH Tone Generator [Computer software]. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.nch.com.au/tongegen/.

31.

Ono

Nakamura

Yoshiyama

Kinkori

Bundo

Kato

Ito

(2011) The effect of musical experience on hemispheric lateralization in musical feature processing. Neuroscience Letters 496: 141–145. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.002.

32.

Ouimet

Foster

N. E. V.

Hyde

K. L.

(2012) Auditory global-local processing: Effects of attention and musical experience. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132: 2536–2544. doi:10.1121/1.4747009.

33.

Pallesen

K. J.

Brattico

Bailey

C. J.

Korvenoja

Koivisto

Gjedde

Carlson

(2010) Cognitive control in auditory working memory is enhanced in musicians. PLoS One 5: e11120. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011120.

34.

Patel

S. H.

Azzam

P. N.

(2005) Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected studies of the event-related potential. International Journal of Medical Sciences 2: 147–154. doi: 10.7150/ijms.2.147.

35.

Peretz

(1990) Processing of local and global musical information in unilateral brain-damaged patients. Brain 113: 1185–1205. doi:10.1093/brain/113.4.1185.

36.

Peretz

Morais

(1987) Analytic processing in the classification of melodies as same or different. Neuropsychologia 25: 645–652. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90055-8.

37.

Polich

(1987) Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 68: 311–320. doi:10.1016/0168-5597(87)90052-9.

38.

Sanders

L. D.

Poeppel

(2007) Local and global auditory processing: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Neuropsychologia 45: 1172–1186. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.010.

39.

Schellenberg

E. G.

(2013) Music and cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14: 317–320. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00389.x.

40.

Schiavetto

Cortese

Alain

(1999) Global and local processing of musical sequences: An event-related brain potential study. NeuroReport 10: 2467–2472. doi:10.1097/00001756-199908200-00006.

41.

Semlitsch

H. V.

Anderer

Schuster

Presslich

(1986) A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 23: 695–703. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x.

42.

Shahin

Bosnyak

D. J.

Trainor

L. J.

Roberts

L. E.

(2003) Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. Journal of Neuroscience 23: 5545–5552.

43.

Stephan

K. E.

Marshall

J. C.

Friston

K. J.

Rowe

J. B.

Ritzl

Zilles

Fink

G. R.

(2003) Lateralized cognitive processes and lateralized task control in the human brain. Science 301: 384–386. doi:10.1126/science.1086025.

44.

Tanaka

J. W.

Farah

M. J.

(1993) Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 46: 225–245. doi:10.1080/14640749308401045.

45.

Weissman

D. H.

Woldorff

M. G.

(2005) Hemispheric asymmetries for different components of global/local attention occur in distinct temporo-parietal loci. Cerebral Cortex 15: 870–876. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh187.

46.

Wernicke

(1874) Der aphasische symptomencomplex: eine psychologische studie auf anatomischer basis [The symptom complex of aphasia: A psychological study on an anatomical basis], Breslau, Poland: Cohn und Weigert.

47.

Wetzel

Ohl

F. W.

Scheich

(2008) Global versus local processing of frequency- modulated tones in gerbils: An animal model of lateralized auditory cortex functions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 6753–6758. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707844105.

48.

Zatorre

R. J.

Belin

(2001) Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex 11: 946–953. doi:10.1093/cercor/11.10.946.

49.

Zatorre

R. J.

Evans

A. C.

Meyer

(1994) Neural mechanisms underlying melodic perception and memory for pitch. Journal of Neuroscience 14: 1908–1919.

50.

Zatorre

R. J.

Evans

A. C.

Meyer

Gjedde

(1992) Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science 256: 846–849. doi:10.1126/science.256.5058.846.