Individual differences in the illusion of self-motion (vection): The role of field dependence,anomalous perceptual experiences,and tolerance of ambiguity
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2025
Individual differences in the illusion of self-motion (vection): The role of field dependence,anomalous perceptual experiences,and tolerance of ambiguity
Vection is an illusion of self-motion that arises from conflicting sensory information. There are large individual differences in experiencing vection, indicating a potential role for individual-difference factors in this illusion. Here, we examined the role of field dependence, anomalous perceptual experiences (a specific domain of psychotic-like experiences) and personality disposition of tolerance of ambiguity. We analyzed data from 170 participants (84 male individuals, 86 female individuals). Biological sex had no significant effect on any of the vection measures. However, we found that higher field dependence was associated with faster onset of vection, and that higher prevalence of anomalous perceptual experiences and lower tolerance of ambiguity were associated with longer duration and higher intensity of the illusion. These results suggest that individual-difference factors reflect internal predispositions that guide the interpretation of incoming sensory signals and, especially in conflicting and ambiguous situations, can modulate the process of creating accurate or illusory percepts.
Alderson-DayB.LimaC. F.EvansS.KrishnanS.ShanmugalingamP.FernyhoughC.ScottS. K. (2017). Distinct processing of ambiguous speech in people with non-clinical auditory verbal hallucinations. Brain, 140(9), 2475–2489. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx206
2.
ApthorpD.NagleF.PalmisanoS. (2014). Chaos in balance: Non-linear measures of postural control predict individual variations in visual illusions of motion. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e113897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113897
3.
BagustJ.RixG. D.HurstH. C. (2005). Use of a computer rod and frame (CRAF) test to assess errors in the perception of visual vertical in a clinical setting—A pilot study. Clinical Chiropractic, 8(3), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clch.2005.07.001
4.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
5.
BellV.HalliganP. W.EllisH. D. (2006). The Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale (CAPS): A new validated measure of anomalous perceptual experience. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(2), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbj014
6.
BertiS.KeshavarzB. (2020). Neuropsychological approaches to visually-induced vection: An overview and evaluation of neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies. Multisensory Research, 34(2), 153–186. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10035
7.
BrittonZ.ArshadQ. (2019). Vestibular and multi-sensory influences upon self-motion perception and the consequences for human behavior. Frontiers in Neurology, 10, 63. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00063
8.
BuryN.-A.JenkinM. R.AllisonR. S.HarrisL. R. (2020). Perceiving jittering self-motion in a field of lollipops from ages 4 to 95. PLoS ONE, 15(10), e0241087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241087
9.
ButlerJ. S.SmithS. T.CamposJ. L.BülthoffH. H. (2010). Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading. Journal of Vision, 10(11), 23. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.11.23
10.
CamposJ. L.ButlerJ. S.BülthoffH. H. (2014). Contributions of visual and proprioceptive information to travelled distance estimation during changing sensory congruencies. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 3277–3289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4011-0
11.
CheungB. S. K.HowardI. P.NedzelskiJ. M.LandoltJ. P. (1989). Circularvection about earth-horizontal axes in bilateral labyrinthine-defective subjects. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 108(5–6), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016488909125537
12.
ClarkA. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477
13.
CorlettP. R.HorgaG.FletcherP. C.Alderson-DayB.SchmackK.PowersA. R. (2019). Hallucinations and strong priors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.001
14.
DalalT. C.MullerA.-M.StevensonR. A. (2021). The relationship between multisensory temporal processing and schizotypal traits. Multisensory Research, 34(5), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10044
15.
D’AmourS.BosJ.KeshavarzB. (2017). The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness. Experimental Brain Research, 235, 2811–2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5009-1
16.
D’AmourS.HarrisL. R.BertiS.KeshavarzB. (2021). The role of cognitive factors and personality traits in the perception of illusory self-motion (vection). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(4), 1804–1817. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02228-3
ErnstM. O.BanksM. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/415429a
FerriF.VenskusA.FotiaF.CookeJ.RomeiV. (2018). Higher proneness to multisensory illusions is driven by reduced temporal sensitivity in people with high schizotypal traits. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.09.006
21.
FetschC. R.TurnerA. H.DeAngelisG. C.AngelakiD. E. (2009). Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(49), 15601–15612. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2574-09.2009
22.
FletcherP. C.FrithC. D. (2009). Perceiving is believing: A Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2536
23.
FristonK. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
24.
FristonK. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
25.
FurnhamA.MarksJ. (2013). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the recent literature. Psychology (Savannah, GA ), 4(9), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.49102
26.
GawędaŁKokoszkaA. (2011). Polish version of the Revised Hallucination Scale (RHS) by Morrison et al. Its factor analysis and the prevalence of hallucinatory-like experiences among healthy participants. Psychiatria Polska, 45(4), 527–543.
GermineL.BensonT. L.CohenF.HookerC. I. (2013). Psychosis-proneness and the rubber hand illusion of body ownership. Psychiatry Research, 207(1–2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.022
29.
HaibachP.SlobounovS.NewellK. (2009). Egomotion and vection in young and elderly adults. Gerontology, 55(6), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1159/000235816
30.
HettingerL. J.SchmidtT.JonesD. L.KeshavarzB. (2014). Illusory self-motion in virtual environments. In HaleK. S.StanneyK. M. (Eds.), Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 435–466). CRC Press.
31.
HillenM. A.GutheilC. M.StroutT. D.SmetsE. M. A.HanP. K. J. (2017). Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 180, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.024
32.
HinterbuchingerB.MossahebN. (2021). Psychotic-like experiences: A challenge in definition and assessment. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 582392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.582392
Jáuregui RenaudK. (2015). Vestibular function and depersonalization/derealization symptoms. Multisensory Research, 28(5/6), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002480
35.
JohnsonW. H.SunaharaF. A.LandoltJ. P. (1999). Importance of the vestibular system in visually induced nausea and self-vection. Journal of Vestibular Research, 9(2), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-1999-9202
36.
KennedyR. S.HettingerL. J.HarmD. L.OrdyJ. M.DunlapW. P. (1996). Psychophysical scaling of circular vection (CV) produced by optokinetic (OKN) motion: Individual differences and effects of practice. Journal of Vestibular Research, 6(5), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-1996-6502
37.
KeshavarzB.CamposJ. L.BertiS. (2015). Vection lies in the brain of the beholder: EEG parameters as an objective measurement of vection. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01581
38.
KeshavarzB.HettingerL. J.VenaD.CamposJ. L. (2014). Combined effects of auditory and visual cues on the perception of vection. Experimental Brain Research, 232(3), 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3793-9
39.
KeshavarzB.Philipp-MullerA. E.HemmerichW.RieckeB. E.CamposJ. L. (2019). The effect of visual motion stimulus characteristics on vection and visually induced motion sickness. Displays, 58, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2018.07.005
40.
KeshavarzB.SpeckM.HaycockB.BertiS. (2017). Effect of different display types on vection and its interaction with motion direction and field dependence. i-Perception, 8(3), 204166951770776. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517707768
41.
KimJ.ChungC. Y. L.NakamuraS.PalmisanoS.KhuuS. K. (2015). The oculus rift: A cost-effective tool for studying visual–vestibular interactions in self-motion perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00248
42.
KlosterhalfenS.MuthE. R.KellermannS.MeissnerK.EnckP. (2008). Nausea induced by vection drum: Contributions of body position, visual pattern, and gender. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 79(4), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.2187.2008
43.
KnillD. C. (2007). Robust cue integration: A Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. Journal of Vision, 7(7), 5. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.7.5
44.
KnillD. C.PougetA. (2004). The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neurosciences, 27(12), 712–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007
45.
KnillD. C.SaundersJ. A. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?Vision Research, 43(24), 2539–2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00458-9
46.
KooijmanL.AsadiH.MohamedS.NahavandiS. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of tactile stimulation in vection research. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(1), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02400-3
47.
KooijmanL.AsadiH.MohamedS.NahavandiS. (2023). A virtual reality study investigating the train illusion. Royal Society Open Science, 10(4), 221622. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221622
48.
KooijmanL.BertiS.AsadiH.NahavandiS.KeshavarzB. (2024). Measuring vection: A review and critical evaluation of different methods for quantifying illusory self-motion. Behavior Research Methods, 56(3), 2292–2310. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02148-8
49.
LachowskaB.LudwikowskaK. (2017). The results of the preliminary validation of the Polish version of the Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 20(4), 875–894. https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych.2017.20.4-5en
50.
LarøiF.BlessJ. J.LaloyauxJ.KråkvikB.Vedul-KjelsåsE.KalhovdeA. M.HirnsteinM.HugdahlK. (2019). An epidemiological study on the prevalence of hallucinations in a general-population sample: Effects of age and sensory modality. Psychiatry Research, 272, 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.003
51.
LeBeauB. (2023). simglm: Simulate models based on the generalized linear model. R package version 0.9.13. https://github.com/lebebr01/simglm
52.
LeeG. C.YooY.JonesS. (1997). Investigation of driving performance, vection, postural sway, and simulator sickness in a fixed-based driving simulator. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 33(3-4), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(97)00186-1
53.
LopezC.ElzièreM. (2018). Out-of-body experience in vestibular disorders—A prospective study of 210 patients with dizziness. Cortex, 104, 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.026
54.
MakowskiD.TeA. S.KirkS.LiangN. Z.ChenS. H. A. (2023). A novel visual illusion paradigm provides evidence for a general factor of illusion sensitivity and personality correlates. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 6594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33148-5
55.
MarsicanoG.CerpelloniF.MelcherD.RonconiL. (2022). Lower multisensory temporal acuity in individuals with high schizotypal traits: A web-based study. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 2782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06503-1
56.
McLainD. L. (1993). The MSTAT-I: A new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001020
57.
McLainD. L. (2009). Evidence of the properties of an ambiguity tolerance measure: The Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-II (MSTAT-II). Psychological Reports, 105(3), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.3.975-988
MorrisonA. P.WellsA.NothardS. (2002). Cognitive and emotional predictors of predisposition to hallucinations in non-patients. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466502760379127
60.
MullerA.-M.DalalT. C.StevensonR. A. (2021). Schizotypal personality traits and multisensory integration: An investigation using the McGurk effect. Acta Psychologica, 218, 103354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103354
61.
MurovecB.SpaniolJ.CamposJ. L.KeshavarzB. (2021). Multisensory effects on illusory self-motion (vection): The role of visual, auditory, and tactile cues. Multisensory Research, 34(8), 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10058
62.
MurovecB.SpaniolJ.CamposJ. L.KeshavarzB. (2022). Enhanced vection in older adults: Evidence for age-related effects in multisensory vection experiences. Perception, 51(10), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066221113770
63.
MurovecB.SpaniolJ.KeshavarzB. (2024). Individual factors and vection in younger and older adults: How sex, field dependence, personality, and visual attention do (or do not) affect illusory self-motion. i-Perception, 15(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695241270302
64.
NourM. M.NourJ. M. (2015). Perception, illusions and Bayesian inference. Psychopathology, 48(4), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437271
65.
OhayonM. M. (2000). Prevalence of hallucinations and their pathological associations in the general population. Psychiatry Research, 97(2-3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1781(00)00227-4
66.
PaigeG. (1994). Senescence of human visual–vestibular interactions: Smooth pursuit, optokinetic, and vestibular control of eye movements with aging. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228423
67.
PalmisanoS.AllisonR. S.SchiraM. M.BarryR. J. (2015). Future challenges for vection research: Definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00193
68.
PowersA. R.MathysC.CorlettP. R. (2017). Pavlovian conditioning-induced hallucinations result from overweighting of perceptual priors. Science, 357(6351), 596–600. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan3458
69.
RieckeB. E.JordanJ. D. (2015). Comparing the effectiveness of different displays in enhancing illusions of self-movement (vection). Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00713
70.
RieckeB. E.MurovecB.CamposJ. L.KeshavarzB. (2023). Beyond the eye: Multisensory contributions to the sensation of illusory self-motion (vection). Multisensory Research, 36(8), 827–864. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10112
71.
RothacherY.NguyenA.LenggenhagerB.KunzA.BruggerP. (2018). Visual capture of gait during redirected walking. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 17974. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36035-6
72.
SangF. Y. P.Jáuregui-RenaudK.GreenD. A.BronsteinA. M.GrestyM. A. (2006). Depersonalisation/derealisation symptoms in vestibular disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 77(6), 760–766. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.075473
73.
SatoH.SandoI.TakahashiH. (1992). Computer-aided three-dimensional measurement of the human vestibular apparatus. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 107(3), 405–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989210700311
74.
SenoT.SawaiK.KanayaH.WakebeT.OgawaM.FujiiY.PalmisanoS. (2017). The oscillating potential model of visually induced vection. i-Perception, 8(6), 204166951774217. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517742176
75.
SenoT.YamadaY.IhayaK. (2011). Narcissistic people cannot be moved easily by visual stimulation. Perception, 40(11), 1390–1392. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7062
76.
SoR. H. Y.LoW. T.HoA. T. K. (2001). Effects of navigation speed on motion sickness caused by an immersive virtual environment. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43(3), 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775898223
77.
StanekK. C.OnesD. S. (2023). Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(23), e2212794120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2212794120
78.
StróżakP.AugustynowiczP.RatomskaM.FrancuzP.Fudali-CzyżA. (2019). Vection attenuates N400 event-related potentials in a change-detection task. Perception, 48(8), 702–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619861882
79.
TeufelC.SubramaniamN.DoblerV.PerezJ.FinnemannJ.MehtaP. R.GoodyerI. M.FletcherP. C. (2015). Shift toward prior knowledge confers a perceptual advantage in early psychosis and psychosis-prone healthy individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(43), 13401–13406. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503916112
80.
TremblayL.ElliottD. (2007). Sex differences in judging self-orientation: The morphological horizon and body pitch. BMC Neuroscience, 8, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-6
81.
TulverK.AruJ.RutikuR.BachmannT. (2019). Individual differences in the effects of priors on perception: A multi-paradigm approach. Cognition, 187, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.008
Van OsJ.LinscottR. J.Myin-GermeysI.DelespaulP.KrabbendamL. (2009). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: Evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder. Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708003814
84.
WeiM.LuoJ.LuoH.SongR. (2017). The effect of gender on vection perception and postural responses induced by immersive virtual rotation drum. In 2017 8th international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering (NER) (pp. 473–476). https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2017.8008392
85.
WitkinH. A.AschS. E. (1948). Studies in space orientation. IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(6), 762–782. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053671
86.
WitkinH. A.MooreC. A.GoodenoughD.CoxP. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
