Calcium looping carbon capture was simulated for a steel plant and three fuel cases were studied: coal, coke, and half coal/coke. The steelmaking production was about 1.2 t of liquid steel per hour at >99.85% purity by weight. This study evaluated the effect of carbon capture efficiency and raw material cost on the lime flow rate in the calcium looping section. Increasing the lime feeding flow rate achieved higher efficiency but at a higher cost. The overall captured efficiency was higher than the flue gas captured efficiency at a low lime feeding flow rate but lower at a high lime feeding flow rate. Then, the overall captured efficiency tended to decrease at high lime feeding flow rate because raw materials were used too much for carbon capture and caused overall carbon dioxide emission more than the content of captured carbon dioxide in the product stream. Coal as fuel plays an important role in carbon emission reduction as one of the raw materials, along with the utility cost and the raw material cost in calcium looping section.
LinYYangHMaL, et al.Low-carbon development for the iron and steel industry in China and the world: status quo, future vision, and key actions. Sustainability2021; 13: 12548.
4.
SuzukiKHayashiKKuribaraK, et al.Quantitative evaluation of CO2 emission reduction of active carbon recycling energy system for ironmaking by modeling with aspen plus. ISIJ Int2015; 55: 340–347.
5.
WangRJiangLWangY, et al.Process simulation of blast furnace operation with biomass syngas injection for clean production. Energy Proc2019; 2: 996.
6.
ZhangHLiHTangQ, et al.Conceptual design and simulation analysis of thermal behaviors of TGR blast furnace and oxygen blast furnace. Sci China Ser E-Technol Sci2010; 53: 85–92.
7.
LucaAVPetrescuL. Membrane technology applied to steel production: investigation based on process modelling and environmental tools. J Clean Prod2021; 294: 126256.
8.
BurgessJM. Fuel combustion in the blast furnace raceway zone. Prog Energy and Combust Sci1985; 11: 61–82.
9.
YilmazCWendelstorfJTurekT. Modeling and simulation of hydrogen injection into a blast furnace to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. J Clean Prod2017; 154: 488–501. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.162
NaiduTSSheridanCMDykLDV. Basic oxygen furnace slag: review of current and potential uses. Miner Eng2020; 149: 106234.
12.
WangR. Energy saving technologies and optimisation of energy use for decarbonized iron and steel industry [dissertation]. Durham (England): Durham University, 2022.
13.
KoornneefJHarmelenTVHorssenAV, et al.Chemistry, Emission Control, Radioactive Pollution and Indoor Air Quality. InTech; 2011. Chapter 2, Carbon dioxide capture and air quality; p. 17–44. doi: 10.5772/1030
14.
EideLIAnhedenMLyngfeltA, et al.Novel capture processes. Oil & Gas Sci Technol2005; 60: 497–508.
15.
MateoM. Assessment of Calcium Looping as a solution for CO2 capture in the steel production process. master’s thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona (Spain), 2014.
16.
ZhangZXWangGXMassarottoP, et al.Optimization of pipeline transport for CO2 sequestration. Energy Convers Manag2006; 47: 702–715.
17.
AliyonKMehrpooyaMHajinezhadA. Comparison of different CO2 liquefaction processes and exergoeconomic evaluation of integrated CO2 liquefaction and absorption refrigeration system. Energy Convers Manag2020; 211: 112752.
LiCMoreno-AtanasioRO’DeaD, et al.Experimental study on the physical properties of iron ore granules made from Australian iron ores. ISIJ Int2019; 59: 253–262.
20.
SciazkoMMertasBKosyrczykL, et al.A predictive model for coal coking based on product yield and energy balance. Energies2020; 13: 4953.
21.
NetoGWFLeiteMBMMarcelinoTOAC, et al.Optimizing the coke oven process by adjusting the temperature of the combustion chambers. Energ2020; 217: 119419. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119419
22.
GaniZFARathnamRKWallT, et al.Ignition and combustion characteristics of Australian coals in air (O2/N2) and oxy-fuel (O2/CO2) conditions. Proc. of the Aust. Combust. Symp. 2007:126–129.
QinSChangS. Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coke production process with waste heat recovery. Energy2017; 141: 435–450. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.105
25.
HwidiRSIzharTNTSaadFNM, et al.Characterization of quicklime as raw material to hydrated lime: effect of temperature on its characteristics. Green Design Manuf2018: 1. doi: 10.1063/1.5066668
26.
MajeedSQudseihREdensFW, et al.Limestone particle size, calcium and phosphorus levels, and phytase effects on live performance and nutrients digestibility of broilers. Poult Sci2020; 99: 1502–1514.
27.
SedghkerdarMHMahinpeyNEllisN. The effect of sawdust on the calcination and the intrinsic rate of the carbonation reaction using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA). Fuel Process Technol2013; 106: 533–538.
28.
GulerCDollimoreDHealGR. The investigation of the decomposition kinetics of calcium carbonate alone and in the presence of some clays using the rising temperature technique. Thermochim Acta1982; 54: 187–199.
29.
ThimsenDMaxsonASmithV, et al.Results from MEA testing at the CO2 technology centre mongstad part I: post-combustion CO2 capture testing methodology. Energy Procedia2014; 63: 5938–5958.
30.
ShanYLiuZGuanD. CO2 Emissions from China’s lime industry. Appl Energy2016; 166: 245–252.
31.
GómezDRWattersonJD. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. 2006. Chapter 2, Stationary combustion; p. 2.1-2.47.
