Natural Disasters,Principled Humanitarianism,and the Prospects for a New Solidarism in International Solidarity

Abstract

This is an inquiry into natural disasters with insights from disaster diplomacy and the English School theory, departing from a debate sparked by France’s call to invoke the R2P in 2008 when Myanmar (Burma) refused to accept international aid following Cyclone Nargis. This call was perceived as turning disasters into a tool of Western interventionism and a new doctrine, the Responsibility to PROVIDE emerged which re-affirmed the consensual nature of disaster assistance. But the debate on coercive humanitarian assistance continues and my contribution links consensual versus coercive disaster response to pluralist and solidarist conceptions of international society, and then points to a new disaster solidarism emerging through (i) Resolution 2165 which authorized coercive aid delivery into Syria and constituted a significant step in the rejection of “apolitical humanitarianism”; (ii) draft articles of the International Law Commission that mention a “duty” to accept disaster aid; (iii) a new transboundary approach to disasters in the UN Sendai Framework; and (iv) robust new climate-disaster projections by climate scientists enabled by artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Keywords

disasters English school coercive humanitarianism resolution 2165 apolitical humanitarianism Sendai framework SMILEs regionally downscaled climate models

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alkhalil

Ekzayez

Rayes

Abbara

(2023). Inequitable access to aid after the devastating earthquake in Syria. Lancet Global Health, 11(5), 653–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00132-8

Anatolian Agency . (2017). Iran rejects Israeli offer to help quake victims. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/iran-rejects-israeli-offer-to-help-quake-victims/965928#

Barber

(2009). The responsibility to protect the survivors of natural disaster: Cyclone Nargis, a case study. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 14(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krn026

Belloni

(2007). The trouble with humanitarianism. Review of International Studies, 33(3), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210507007607

Berchtold

Vollmer

Sendrowski

Neisser

Müller

Grigoleit

(2020). Barriers and facilitators in interorganizational disaster response: Identifying examples across Europe. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00249-y

Brown

McLeman

(2009). A recurring anarchy? The emergence of climate change as a threat to international peace and security: Analysis. Conflict, Security and Development, 9(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800903142680

Bull

(1966). The grotian conception of international society. In Butterfield

Wight

(Eds.), Diplomatic investigations: Essays in the theory of international politics (pp. 51–73). George Allen & Unwin.

Bull

(1995). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press.

Carpi

(2020). Different shades of ‘neutrality’: Arab Gulf NGO responses to Syrian refugees in northern Lebanon. In Fiddian-Qasmiyeh

(Ed.), Refuge in a moving world: Tracing refugee and migrant journeys across disciplines (pp. 415–428). UCL Press.

10.

Cook

A. D.

(2010). Positions of responsibility: A comparison of ASEAN and EU approaches towards Myanmar. International Politics, 47(3-4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.7

11.

Delforge

Below

Speybroeck

van Loenhout

J. A. F.

(2024). Disaster year in review 2023. Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. https://files.emdat.be/2024/04/CredCrunch74.pdf

12.

Donatti

Nicholas

Fedele

Delforge

Speybroeck

Moraga

Blatter

Below

Zvoleff

(2024). Global hotspots of climate-related disasters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Early Access, 108(1), Article 104488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104488

13.

Donovan

Oppenheimer

(2019). Volcanoes on borders: A scientific and (geo)political challenge. Bulletin of Volcanology, 81(5), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-019-1291-z

14.

Duffield

(2001). Governing the borderlands: Decoding the power of aid. Disasters, 25(4), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00180

15.

Duffield

(2007). Development, security and unending war: Governing the world of peoples. Polity Press.

16.

Ehmele

Kautz

L.-A.

Feldmann

Pinto

J. G.

(2020). Long term variance of heavy precipitation across central Europe using a large ensemble of regional climate model simulations. Earth System Dynamics, 11(2), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-469-2020

17.

Ekengren

Matzén

Rhinard

Svantesson

(2006). Solidarity or sovereignty? EU cooperation in civil protection. Journal of European Integration, 28(5), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330600979672

18.

Elnakib

Aly

Asi

Shawar

(2024). The humanitarian system: Politics cannot be avoided. Lancet, 404(10458), 1105–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01648-9

19.

Enia

(2008). Peace in its wake? The 2004 tsunami and internal conflict in Indonesia and Sri Lanka. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 19(1), 7–27. https://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/pr1dr2p86z

20.

Evans

(2008). Facing up to our responsibilities. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/may/12/facinguptoourresponsbilities

21.

Feniger

Kallus

(2016). Expertise in the name of diplomacy: The Israeli plan for rebuilding the Qazvin region, Iran. International Journal of Islamic Architecture, 5(1), 103–134. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijia.5.1.103_1

22.

Field

Barros

Stocker

Dahe

Dokken

Ebi

Mastrandrea

Mach

Plattner

G.-K.

Allen

Tignor

Midgley

(2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/metadata/publications/ipcc-managing-the-risks-of-extreme-events-and-disasters

23.

Foucault

(1979). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Palgrave Macmillan.

24.

Ganapati

Kelman

Koukis

(2010). Analysing Greek-Turkish disaster-related cooperation: A disaster diplomacy perspective. Cooperation and Conflict, 45(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836709347216

25.

Garthwaite

(2023). Syria Earthquake: Why did the UN aid take so long to arrive? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-64866689

26.

Guha-Sapir

Hargitt

Hoyois

(2004). Thirty years of natural disasters. 1974-2003: The Numbers. Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. https://www.unisdr.org/files/1078_publication2004emdat.pdf

27.

Harmer

Stoddard

Sarazen

(2018). Humanitarian access in armed conflict: A need for new principles? Expert Advisory Call Down Service. UK Aid. https://humanitarianoutcomes.org/sites/default/files/publications/scoping_study-humanitarian_access_and_new_principles.pdf

28.

Hyogo Framework for Action . (2005-2015). United Nations office for disaster risk reduction. https://www.unisdr.org/files/1037_hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf

29.

International Humanitarian Law Databases . (nd). Rule 55: Access to humanitarian relief to civilians in need. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule55

30.

International Law Commission . (2016). Draft articles on the protection of persons in the event of disasters. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/6_3_2016.pdf

31.

Israel Defense Forces . (2017). Operation good neighbor. Inside the IDF’s Effort to Provide Aid to Syria. https://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/humanitarian-missions/operation-good-neighbor/operation-good-neighbor-inside-the-idf-s-effort-to-provide-aid-to-syria/

32.

Junk

(2016). Testing boundaries: Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar and the scope of R2P. Global Society, 30(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1092423

33.

Kelman

(2007). Hurricane Katrina disaster diplomacy. Disasters, 31(3), 288–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01010.x

34.

Kelman

Field

Suri

Bhat

G. M.

(2018). Disaster diplomacy in Jammu and Kashmir. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31(1), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.007

35.

Keridis

(2006). Earthquakes, diplomacy and new thinking in foreign policy. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 30(1), 207–214. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/45289344

36.

Lehrs

(2021). Conflict and cooperation in the age of COVID-19: The Israeli-Palestinian case. International Affairs, 97(6), 1843–1862. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab143

37.

Maher

Milinski

Ludwig

(2021). Large ensemble climate model simulations: Introduction, overview, and future prospects for utilising multiple types of large ensemble. Earth System Dynamics, 12(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-401-2021

38.

Mitchell

(2008). Burma (cyclone Nargis). UK Parliament. https://hansard.parliament.uk/%E2%80%8CCommons/2008-05-08/debates/08050857000004/Burma(CycloneNargis)

39.

Pelling

Dill

(2010). Disaster politics: Tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509105004

40.

Pescaroli

Alexander

D. E.

(2015). A definition of cascading disasters and cascading effects: Going beyond the “toppling dominos” metaphor. The Planetary Report, 3(1), 58–67. https://www.preventionweb.net/publication/definition-cascading-disasters-and-cascading-effects-going-beyond-toppling-dominos

41.

Pinheiro

(2023). Epicenter of neglect: Protection of civilians in Syria remains an illusion says UN Syria commission of inquiry. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/03/epicentre-neglect-protection-civilians-syria-remains-illusion-says-un-syria

42.

Rabat Declaration for Disaster Risk Reduction . (2021). https://rp-arabstates.undrr.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/Rabat_Declaration_English.pdf

43.

Raschky

Schwindt

(2009). On the channel and type of international disaster aid (English). Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 4953. World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/317961468160781190/On-the-channel-and-type-of-international-disaster-aid

44.

Relief Web . (2008). Communique issued by Bernard Kouchner - excerpts. https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/communiqu%C3%A9-issued-m-bernard-kouchner-excerpts-paris-8-may-2008

45.

Resolution 2165 . (2014). United Nations. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n14/465/91/pdf/n1446591.pdf?token=v30torlb4SEAEWTB00&fe=true

46.

Resolution 46/182 . (1991). Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian emergency assistance of the United Nations. United Nations. https://documents.un.org/doc/resolution/gen/nr0/582/70/img/nr058270.pdf

47.

Security Council Report . (2023). Syria: Vote on reauthorization of the cross-border aid mechanism. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2023/07/syria-vote-on-reauthorisation-of-the-cross-border-aid-mechanism.php#:∼:text=The_Syria_cross%2Dborder_aid,been_difficult_for_several_years

48.

Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction . (2015-2030). United nations office for disaster risk reduction. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030

49.

Spiegel

Karadag

Blanchet

Undie

Mateus

Horton

(2024). The CHH-lancet commission on health, conflict and forced displacement: Reimagining the humanitarian system. Lancet, 403(10433), 1215–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00426-4

50.

Tan

S. S.

(2017). Providing for the other: Rethinking sovereignty and responsibility in Southeast Asia. Critical Studies on Security, 5(3), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2017.1416519

51.

Tarnas

Karah

Almhawish

Aladhan

Alobaid

Abbara

(2023). Politicization of water, humanitarian response, and health in Syria as a contributor to the ongoing cholera outbreak. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 131(1), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.03.042

52.

Thakur

(2008). To invoke or not to invoke R2P in Burma. Center for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/invoke-or-not-invoke-r2p-burma/

53.

The Telegraph . (2023). King of Morocco refuses aid from France. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/09/11/rescuers-race-find-survivors-morocco-earthquake/

54.

UNDRR . (nd). Disaster terminology. United nations office for disaster risk reduction. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/disaster

55.

UNFCC . (2022). 12 July. Conflict and climate. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/news/conflict-and-climate

56.

UN General Assembly . (2021). 76th session. Targets of unilateral coercive measures: Notion, categories and vulnerable groups. Note by the secretary general. United Nations. A/76/174/Rev.1. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3940128?ln=en&v=pdf

57.

UN News . (2021). Climate and weather related disasters surge five-fold over 50 years, but early warnings save lives – WMO report. https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/09/1098662

58.

US Geological Survey . (2023). M 7.8 – Pazarcik earthquake, Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000jllz/executive

59.

Valencia-Ospina

(2012). Fifth report on the protection of persons in the event of disasters. United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/743167?ln=fr&v=pdf

60.

World Climate Research Program . (nd). Coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment. https://cordex.org/about/history/

61.

Singh

V. P.

(2023). Increasing risks of future compound climate extremes with warming over global land masses. Earth’s Future, 11(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003466