Having outlined in the first part of the paper the principles guiding the selection of indicators to measure development at the level of human beings, the authors proceed in this second and concluding part to present such indicators, without, however, making any claims to finality. The idea is to measure development by the size of the sufficiency group in society; that is, the proportion of the population that is enabled to satisfy its fundamental and almost fundamental needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GaltungJ. (1967). On the effects of international economic sanctions with examples from the case of Rhodesia. World Politics, April, 378–416.
2.
GaltungJ. (1967). Theory and Methods of Social Research. George Allen and Unwin: London, ch. II, 2.3.
3.
GaltungJ. (1970). Cooperation in Europe. Oslo: Universitets forlaget. (Particularly Part I).
4.
GaltungJ. (1971). A structural theory of exploitation. Journal of Peace Research, 81–117.
5.
GaltungJ. (1974). Economic and Peace Research. Chair in Conflict and Peace Research: Oslo (mimeo).
6.
GaltungJ. (1975). The True Worlds: A Transnational Perspective (in print), ch. 3.
7.
GaltungJ.BeckC.JaastadJ. (1974). Educational growth and educational disparity (mimeo). Chair in Conflict and Peace Research.
8.
GaltungJ. (1975). Measuring world development. Alternatives, Vol. I. No. I.
9.
GaltungJ.HoivikT. (1971). Structural and direct violence. Journal of Peace Research.
10.
GaltungJ.WieseV. (1974). Measuring non-formal education (mimeo). Chair in Conflict and Peace Research.
11.
GleditschN.HoivikT. (1969). Structural parameters of graphs: a theoretical investigation. Quality and Quantity, IV, 1, 139–209.
12.
IllichIvan. (1974). Energy and Equity. Harper and Row: New York.
13.
NossArne. (1973). The shallow and the deep: long-range ecology movement. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.
