This paper presents an investigation of age and friendship effects on the processes and outcomes of children's musical collaborations. Previous research in this area (Miell and MacDonald, 2000) has highlighted that when children work together with a friend they produce compositions that are rated as being better quality than compositions produced by children who do not work with a friend. In addition, children working with a friend have been shown to communicate (both verbally and musically) in a style that is more conducive to good quality collaboration. In the present study, girls worked together on a keyboard composition, and pairs of different ages were compared since the effect that age might have on children's compositions is currently a topical issue (Barrett, 1998). All verbal and musical communication was coded in line with criteria developed and validated previously. The younger girls who worked with a friend produced compositions that were rated as being of a better quality than the compositions produced by those of the same age who did not work with a friend. In addition, the musical and verbal interactions of these friendship pairs were seen as being more characteristic of good quality collaboration. This effect was not found for the older pairs, and possible reasons for this pattern of findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Azmitia, M.
and Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2(3), 202-221.
2.
Barrett, M.
(1998). Researching children's compositional process and products: connection to music education practice. In: B. Sundrin, G. E. MacPherson and G. Folkestad (Eds), Children Composing, pp. 10-35. Malmo: Malmo Academy of Music.
3.
Barrett, M.
(1996). Children's aesthetic decision-making: and analysis of children's musical discourse as composers. International Journal of Music Education, 28, 37-62.
4.
Brandstrom, S.
and Hogberg, F. (1998). Composing and teaching composition: the Lulea Concept. In: B. Sundin, G. E. McPherson and G. Folkestad (Eds.), Children Composing, pp. 82-97. Malmo: Lund University.
5.
Berkowitz, M.
and Gibbs, J. (1983). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 29, 399-410.
6.
Berkowitz, M. W.
, Gibbs, J. C. and Broughton, J. (1980). The relation of moral judgement disparity to developmental effects of peer dialogue. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 26, 341-357.
7.
Byrne, C.
(1996). The use of pattern and echo in developing the creative abilities of secondary school pupils. British Journal of Music Education, 13, 143-154.
8.
Davies, C.
(1992). Listen to my song: a study of songs invented by children aged 5-7 years. British Journal of Music Education, 9, 19-49.
9.
Davies, C.
(1994). The listening teacher: an approach to the collection and study of invented songs of children aged 5-7. In: H. Lees (Ed.), Musical connections: Tradition and Change (Proceedings of the 1st World Congress of the International Society for Music Education, held in Tampa, Florida) Auckland. N.Z.: Uniprint, The University of Auckland, 120-128.
10.
Dowling W. J.
(1982). Melodic information processing and its development. In: D. Deutsch (Ed.), The Psychology of Music. New York: Academic Press.
11.
Dowling W. J.
(1984). Development of musical schemata in children's spontaneous singing. In: W. R. Crozier and A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive processes in the perception of art. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Press.
12.
Hargreaves, D. J.
, Galton, M. J. and Robinson, S. (1996). Teachers' assessment of primary children's classwork in the creative arts. Educational Research, 38(2), 199-211.
13.
Harrison, C.
and Pound, L. (1996). Talking Music: Empowering children as musical communicators. British Journal of Music Education, 13(3), 233-242.
14.
Hartup, W. W.
(1996). The company they keep: friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1-13.
15.
Hartup, W. W., Daiute, C., Zajac, R. and Sholl, W. (1995). Collaboration in creative writing by friends and non-friends. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota. Cited in Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1-13.
16.
Hickey, M.
(2000). The use of consensual assessment in the evaluation of children's music compositions. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference. Music Perception and Cognition. Keele University, United Kingdom.
17.
Hockaday, F.
(1984). Collaborative learning with young children. Educational Studies, 10, 3-3.
18.
How, C.
, Duchak-Tanner, V. and Tolmie, T. (2000). Co-ordinating support for conceptual and procedural learning in science. In: R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner and D. Miell (Eds.), Rethinking Collaborative Learning, pp. 81-101. London: Free Association Books.
19.
Joiner, R.
, Hall, J., Faulkner, D., Littleton, K., Miell, D. and Thompson, L. (1997). "Chemicals and Computers: The effects of computer-based collaborative learning on the acquisition of scientific reasoning skills." Paper presented at the biennial conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Athens, August.
20.
Kratus, J.
(1989). A time analysis of the compositional processes used by children ages 7 to 11. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37(1), 5-20.
21.
Kruger, A. C.
(1992). The effect of peer and adult-child transactive discussions on moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 191-211.
22.
Kruger, A. C.
(1993). Peer collaboration: conflict, co-operation or both. Social Development, 2(3), 165-182.
23.
MacDonald, R. A. R.
and Miell, D. (2000). Creativity and Music Education: The Impact of Social Variables (2000). International Journal of Music Education, 36, 58-68.
24.
MacDonald, R. A. R.
, Miell, D. and Morgan, L. (2000). Social processes and creative collaboration in children. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 15(4), 405-416.
25.
MacDonald, R. A. R.
, O'Donnell, P. J. and Davies, J. B. (1999). Structured music workshops for individuals with learning difficulty: An empirical investigation. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3), 225-241.
26.
McKernon, P.
(1979). The development of first songs in young children. In: H. Gardner and D. Wolf (Eds.), Early symbolism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Miell, D.
and MacDonald, R. A. R. (2000). Children's creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition. Social Development, 9(3), 348-369.
28.
Moog, H.
(1976). The Musical Experience of the Pre-school Child. London: Schott.
29.
Morgan, L.
, Hargreaves, D. J. and Joiner, R. (2000). Children's collaborative music composition: Communication through music. In: R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner and D. Miell (Eds.), Rethinking Collaborative Learning, pp. 52-65, London: Free Association Books.
30.
Newcomb, A. F.
and Brady, J. E. (1982). Mutuality in boys' friendship relations. Child Development, 53,392-395.
31.
Swanwick, K.
and Tillman, J. (1986). The sequence of musical development: A study of children's composition. British Journal of Music Education, 3, 305-339.
32.
Tomasello, M.
, Kruger, A. C. and Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences. Cited in Kruger, A. C. (1993). Peer collaboration: conflict, co-operation or both. Social Development, 2(3), 165-182.
33.
Wiggins, J. H.
(1999). The nature of shared musical understanding and it's role in empowering independent musical thinking. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 143, 65-90.
34.
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
35.
Younker, B. A.
(2000). Thought processes and strategies of students engaged in music composition. Research Studies in Music Education, 14, 24-39.
