This study revealed the modes of communication employed between the members of a professional string quartet during rehearsal and performance. Results of this study enabled comparison with modes of communication employed by a student jazz sextet revealed in a previous study by the first author. Six modes of communication were revealed in both studies (i.e., verbal and non-verbal, instruction/cooperation/ collaboration). Results indicated that the modes of communication employed by both groups of musicians (i.e., the string quartet and the jazz sextet) were the same, although, at times, the content of the communication differed based on the presence of a pre-composed score and conventions of the musical genre. Participants in both studies confirmed researcher interpretations of the modes of communication during member checks. Results also indicated that when playing from a pre-composed score the string quartet were able to become empathetically attuned and produce ‘spontaneous musical variations’ during performance. The authors propose that these spontaneous musical variations are examples of ‘empathetic creativity’.
Arnold, R. ( 2004). Empathic intelligence: Relating, educating, transforming . Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
2.
Berliner, P.F. ( 1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3.
Berliner, P.F. ( 1997). Give and take: The collective conversation of jazz performance . In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp 9-41). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
4.
Blum, D. ( 1986). The art of quartet playing: The Guarneri Quartet in conversation with David Blum. New York: Cornell University Press.
5.
Brown, L.M., & Gilligan, C. ( 1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girl’s development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Butterworth, T. ( 1990). ‘Detroit String Quartet’, in J.R. Hackman (Ed.), Groups that work (and those that don’t) (pp. 207-224). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Clayton, M. ( 2005). Communication in Indian raga performance. In D. Miell, R. MacDonald , & D. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 361-382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Cohen, A.J. ( 2005). Music cognition: Defining constraints on musical communication . In D. Miell, R. MacDonald, & D. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 61-84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
Davidson, J.W. ( 2005). Bodily communication in musical performance. In D. Miell, R. MacDonald, & D. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 215-238) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Davidson, J.W., & Good, J.M.M. ( 2002). Social and musical co-ordination between members of a string quartet: An exploratory study. Psychology of Music , 30(2), 186-201.
11.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
12.
Hoogsteder, M., Maier, R., & Elbers, E. ( 1998). Adult-child interaction, joint problem solving and the structure of co-operation. In M. Woodhead , D. Faulkner, & K. Littleton (Eds.), Cultural worlds of early childhood (pp. 178-195). London: Routledge .
13.
Kenny, B.J., & Gellrich, M. ( 2002). Improvisation. In R. Parncutt & G.E. McPherson (Eds.), The science & psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 117-134). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
King, E.C. ( 2006). The roles of student musicians in quartet rehearsals . Psychology of Music, 34(2), 262-282.
15.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. ( 1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
McLeod, J. ( 1994). Doing counselling research. London , Sage.
17.
Monson, I. ( 1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
18.
Murnighan, J.K., & Conlon, D.E. ( 1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165-186.
19.
Palmer, C. ( 1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology , 48, 139-162.
20.
Punch, K.F. ( 1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
21.
Quartetto Paul Klee (n.d.) Website. Retrieved 16 December 2008, from http://www.quartettopaulklee.it
22.
Rounds, D. ( 1999). The four and the one: In praise of string quartets. Fort Bragg, CA: Lost Coast Press.
23.
Sawyer, K. ( 2005). Music and conversation. In D. Miell, R. MacDonald, & D.J. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 45-60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
Sawyer, K. ( 2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration . Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148-165.
25.
Schutz, A. ( 1964). Making music together: A study in social relationships . In A. Brodessen (Ed.), Collected papers, Vol. 2: Studies in social theory (pp. 159-178). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
26.
Seddon, F.A. ( 2004). Empathetic creativity: The product of empathetic attunement . In D. Meill & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative creativity (pp. 56-78). London: Free Association Books.
27.
Seddon, F.A. ( 2005). Modes of communication during jazz improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 47-61.
28.
Seddon, F.A., & O’Neill, S.A. (2003). Creative thinking processes in adolescent computer-based composition: An analysis of strategies adopted and the influence of formal instrumental training. Music Education Research, 5(2), 125-138.
29.
Tovstiga, G., Odenthal, S., & Goerner, S. ( 2005). ‘Sense making and learning in complex organisations: The string quartet revisited’. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 1(3), 215-231.
30.
Underwood, J. & Underwood, G. ( 1999). Task effects on co-operative and collaborative learning with computers. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with Computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp.10-23). London: Routledge.
