Charity begins with prosocial music: Musical differences in intertemporal prosocial discounting and generosity

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that exposure to music with prosocial lyrics can increase the accessibility of prosocial thoughts, leading to greater empathy and fostering helping behaviors. However, existing studies have largely neglected the intertemporal nature of altruism, limiting their scope of interpretation. The present research investigates the effects of attentively listening to music with prosocial lyrics (Study 1) and playing prosocial background music (Study 2) on intertemporal charitable donations. Both studies indicated that relative to neutral music, listening to songs with prosocial lyrics enhanced intertemporal donation behavior. Interpersonal empathy served a mediating role in this effect. These findings align with the General Learning Model, highlighting the significance of the empathy pathway in elucidating how media exposure impacts intertemporal altruism.

Keywords

prosocial music media effects intertemporal prosocial discounting time delay generosity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

J. J.

Anderson

C. A.

Bushman

B. J.

(2018). The general aggression model. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.034

Alós-Ferrer

Strack

(2014). From dual processes to multiple selves: Implications for economic behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.12.005

Andreoni

Serra-Garcia

(2021). Time inconsistent charitable giving. Journal of Public Economics, 198, 104391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104391

Böhm

Ruth

Schramm

(2016). “Count on me”—The influence of music with prosocial lyrics on cognitive and affective aggression. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 26, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000155

Buckley

K. E.

Anderson

C. A.

(2006). A theoretical model of the effects and consequences of playing video games. In Vorderer

Bryant

(Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 363–378). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chung

Lee

E. J.

Jung

Y. J.

Kim

S. H.

(2016). Music-induced mood biases decision strategies during the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00453

Coyne

S. M.

Padilla-Walker

L. M.

Holmgren

H. G.

Davis

E. J.

Collier

K. M.

Memmott-Elison

M. K.

Hawkins

A. J.

(2018). A meta-analysis of prosocial media on prosocial behavior, aggression, and empathic concern: A multidimensional approach. Developmental Psychology, 54(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000412

Craig

A. C.

Garbarino

Heger

S. A.

Slonim

(2017). Waiting to give: Stated and revealed preferences. Management Science, 63(11), 3672–3690. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2504

Crick

N. R.

Dodge

K. A.

(1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74

10.

Damgaard

M. T.

Gravert

(2017). Now or never! The effect of deadlines on charitable giving: Evidence from two natural field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.013

11.

Davis

M. H.

(1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

12.

Dreber

Fudenberg

Levine

D. K.

Rand

D. G.

(2016, February 17). Self-control, social preferences and the effect of delayed payments. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2139/ssrn.2477454

13.

Jiang

Man

Jiang

(2020). The effects of background music on neural responses during reading comprehension. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 18651. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75623-3

14.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

15.

Felix

Philipp

Armin

Thomas

W. G.

(2021). Intertemporal altruism. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3771742

16.

Greitemeyer

(2009a). Effects of songs with prosocial lyrics on prosocial behavior: Further evidence and a mediating mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(11), 1500–1511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209341648

17.

Greitemeyer

(2009b). Effects of songs with prosocial lyrics on prosocial thoughts, affect, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.003

18.

Greitemeyer

(2022). Prosocial modeling: Person role models and the media. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.024

19.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100

20.

Hong

Liang

(2023). “Fill the world with love”: Songs with prosocial lyrics enhance online charitable donations among Chinese adults. Behavioral Sciences, 13(9), 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13090739

21.

Hong

Liang

(2024). Can you change my generosity towards future others? The impact of observability on intertemporal pro-social decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 37(1), e2365. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2365

22.

Huesmann

L. R.

(1986). Psychological processes promoting the relation between exposure to media violence and aggressive behavior by the viewer. Journal of Social Issues, 42(3), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00246.x

23.

Jacob

Guéguen

Boulbry

(2010). Effects of songs with prosocial lyrics on tipping behavior in a restaurant. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 761–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.02.004

24.

Jones

Rachlin

(2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17(4), 283–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01699.x

25.

Kniffin

K. M.

Yan

Wansink

Schulze

W. D.

(2017). The sound of cooperation: Musical influences on cooperative behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2128

26.

Kou

Hong

H. F.

Tan

(2007). Revisioning prosocial tendencies measure for adolescent. Psychological Development and Education, 23(1), 112–117.

27.

Kovarik

(2009). Giving it now or later: Altruism and discounting. Economics Letters, 102(3), 152–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2008.12.005

28.

Liang

Hong

(2023). Time matters: Time perspectives predict intertemporal prosocial preferences. Behavioral Sciences, 13(7), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070590

29.

Ludwig

Dignath

Lukas

(2021). Positive and negative action-effects improve task-switching performance. Acta Psychologica, 221, 103440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103440

30.

Xia

Zhang

Tao

(2023). The effects of prosocial lyrics music on attentional bias. Psychology of Music, 51(1), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356221100285

31.

Wang

(2021). The role of empathy in the mechanism linking parental psychological control to emotional reactivities to COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study among Chinese emerging adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110399

32.

Noguchi

Gel

Y. R.

Brunner

Konietschke

(2012). nparLD: An R software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. Journal of Statistical Software, 50(12), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v050.i12

33.

North

A. C.

Hargreaves

D. J.

(1995). Subjective complexity, familiarity, and liking for popular music. Psychomusicology: A Journal of Research in Music Cognition, 14, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094090

34.

Ogawa

Ida

(2015). Investigating donating behavior using hypothetical dictator game experiments. Review of Social Economy, 73(2), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2015.1035908

35.

Olson

E. A.

Rosso

I. M.

Demers

L. A.

Divatia

Killgore

W. D. S.

(2016). Sex differences in psychological factors associated with social discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1876

36.

Gao

Tobler

P. N.

(2021). Testosterone reduces generosity through cortical and subcortical mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(12), e2021745118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021745118

37.

Pornpattananangkul

Chowdhury

Feng

(2017). Social discounting in the elderly: Senior citizens are good samaritans to strangers. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 74(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx040

38.

Ruth

(2017). “Heal the World”: A field experiment on the effects of music with prosocial lyrics on prosocial behavior. Psychology of Music, 45(2), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616652226

39.

Ruth

(2018). “They don’t really care. . .”: Effects of music with prosocial content and corresponding media coverage on prosocial behavior. Musicae Scientiae, 22(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864917716735

40.

Ruth

(2019a). “If you wanna make the world a better place”: Factors influencing the effect of songs with prosocial lyrics. Psychology of Music, 47(4), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618766687

41.

Ruth

(2019b). “Where is the love?” Topics and prosocial behavior in German popular music lyrics from 1954 to 2014. Musicae Scientiae, 23(4), 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864918763480

42.

Schram

(2005). Artificiality: The tension between internal and external validity in economic experiments. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780500086081

43.

Schulreich

Heussen

Gerhardt

Mohr

Binkofski

Koelsch

Heekeren

(2014). Music-evoked incidental happiness modulates probability weighting during risky lottery choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 981. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00981

44.

Strombach

Weber

Hangebrauk

Kenning

Karipidis

I. I.

Tobler

P. N.

Kalenscher

(2015). Social discounting involves modulation of neural value signals by temporoparietal junction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(5), 1619–1624. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.1414715112

45.

Stupacher

Witek

M. A. G.

Vuoskoski

J. K.

Vuust

(2020). Cultural familiarity and individual musical taste differently affect social bonding when moving to music. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 10015. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66529-1

46.

Touré-Tillery

Fishbach

(2017). Too far to help: The effect of perceived distance on the expected impact and likelihood of charitable action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000089

47.

Vekaria

K. M.

Brethel-Haurwitz

K. M.

Cardinale

E. M.

Stoycos

S. A.

Marsh

A. A.

(2017). Social discounting and distance perceptions in costly altruism. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(5), 100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0100

48.

Zhang

J.-X.

Fang

(2019). Lyrics only or lyrics with music? The effect of different lyric conditions on prosocial-related outcomes. Psychology Journal, 8(4), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.269

49.

Zhang

F.-f.

Dong

Wang

(2010). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index-C. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 155–157.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.99 MB