Comparison of Novice Listeners' Similarity Judgements and Style Categorisation of Classic and Romantic Piano Examplars

Abstract

Cognitive psychologists have recently questioned the role of similarity in categorisation. Results inferred from classification errors in a previous study (Thorisson, 1995) indicated that novices base their categorisation of Classic and Romantic piano exemplars primarily on texture and to less extent chord progression. The study examined (a) the relationship between similarity and style categorisation, (b) whether multidimensional scaling (MDS) of subjects' similarity ratings support the salience of texture and chord progression, (c) whether similarity clustering better reflects classification errors of subjects given explicit or implicit style training and (d) subjects' open-ended written comparisons concur with dimensions identified by a priori attribute scales in previous MDS studies. Results indicated (a) a fairly stable relationship between similarity judgements and style categorisation for implicitly trained subjects, (b) confirmed the significance of texture, mingled, however, with other potency attributes, (c) supported the perceptual dominance of potency and activity as found in earlier MDS studies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berlyne, D. F. (1976). The new experimental aesthetics and the problem of classifying works of art. Scientific Aesthetics/Sciences de lArt, 1, 85-106.

Eastlund, J. O. (1992). A multidimensional scaling analysis of musical style. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 204-215.

Eastlund-Gromko, J. O. (1993). Perceptual differences between expert and novice music listeners: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Psychology of Music, 21, 34-47.

Hare, F. G. (1975). The identification of dimensions underlying verbal and non-verbal responses to music through multidimensional scaling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada).

Hargreaves, D. J. (1986). The developmental psychology of music. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Komatsu, L. K. (1992). Recent views of conceptual structure. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 500-526.

Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.

Medin, D. L. and Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In: S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning, pp. 179-195. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Medin, D. L. , Goldstone, R. L. and Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for Similarity. Psychological Review, 100, No. 2, 254-278.

10.

Miller, R. F. (1979). An analysis of musical perception through multidimensional scaling. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

11.

National standards for arts education: What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts (1994). Reston, Virginia: Music Educators National Conference.

12.

Osgood, C. E. , Suci, G. J. and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

13.

Pollard-Gott, L. (1983). Emergence of thematic concepts in repeated listening to music. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 66-94.

14.

Thorisson, T. (1995). The effects of prototype and exemplar learning and selected musical attributes on high school students' musical style categorisation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, U.S.A. University Microfilms International No. 9614687.

15.

Thorisson, T. (1997). Effects of prototype and exemplar learning and four musical dimensions on the formation of musical style concepts. Bulletin of the Councilfor Research in Music Education, 133, 136-142.

16.

Torgerson, W. S. (1965). Multidimensional scaling of similarity. Psychometrica, 30, 379-393.

17.

Tversky, A. and Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In: E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization, pp. 79-98. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

18.

Wedin, L. (1972). A multidimensional study of perceptual-emotional qualities in music. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13, 241-257.

19.

Wilkinson, Leland . SYSTAT. The System for Statistics. Evanston, IL.: SYSTAT, Inc., 1989.