The standard work here is stillStephen D. Krasncr (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), but my later comments do not include the work on regimes by Friedrich Kratochwil and John Ruggie.
2.
One of the best is John S. Odell, US International Monetary System (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press , 1987).
3.
See Robert Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987).
4.
Ibid, pp. xi-xvi.
5.
See Richard K. Ashley , The Political Economy of War and Peace (London: Frances Pinter, 1980).
6.
For the notion of two forms of world economy see Charles-Albert Michalet ' From International Trade to World Economy' in H. Makler et al. (eds.), The New International Economy (London: Sage, 1982), and for an analysis of different structures of political economy, see Susan Strange, States and Markets (London: Pinter Publishers, 1998).
7.
See John Maclean , 'Political Theory, International Theory and the Problem of Ideology', Millennium: Journal of International Studies (Vol. 10. No, 2, Summer 1981), pp. 102-25.
8.
On this point and many others I have found the work of John Gunnell accessible and relevant. See J.G. Gunnell, Philosophy, Science and Political Inquiry (Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1975) and J.G. Gunnell, 'Philosophy and Political Theory'. Government and Opposition (Vol. 14, No. 2, 1979), pp. 198-216.
9.
For a discussion of the common positivist basis of 'historical' and 'scientific' IPE, see Roger Tooze , 'International Political Economy' in Steve Smith (ed.), International Relations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).
10.
John Gunnell , 'Philosophy and Political Theory', op. cit., p. 208.
11.
Ibid, p. 209.
12.
Stanley Hoffmann , 'An American Social Science: International Relations ', Daedalus (Vol. 106, No. 3, 1977), pp. 41-60.
13.
See also Friedrich Kratochwil, Rules, Norms and Decisions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for BISA, forthcoming).
14.
See R. Tooze, op. cit, p. 114.
15.
Perhaps the most influential of the works using this framework was Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye, Power and Interdependence (Boston: Little, Brown, 1977). See also their 'Power and Interdependence Revisited', International Organization (Vol. 41, No. 4, Autumn 1987 ), pp. 725-53.
16.
Andrew Sayer has provided the clearest discussion on this problem that I have yet to discover; see his Method on Social Science: A Realist Approach (London: Hutchinson, 1984).
17.
See John Maclean 'Belief Systems and Ideology in IR: A Critical Approach' in R. Little and S. Smith (eds.), Belief Systems in International Relations ( Oxford; Blackwell, forthcoming 1988 ).
18.
See Roger Tooze, ' "Economic Belief Systems" and Understanding International Relations ' in R. Little and S. Smith (eds.), op. cit For an extended discussion of this crucial point, see John Maclean, 'Belief Systems and Ideology in IR: A Critical Approach', op. cit.
19.
Stanley Hoffmann, op. cit, p. 48. Emphasis added.
20.
Robert Gilpin, op. cit
21.
I have discussed this in Roger Tooze, 'The Emergence of a New International Political Economy: A Realist View', Millennium: Journal of International Studies (Vol. 16, No. 3, Winter 1987), pp. 523-8.
22.
See particularly Robert Gilpin, US Power and the Multinational Corporation (London: Macmillan , 1976), pp. 20-43.
23.
See Andrew Sayer, op. cit, p. 37.
24.
For an extended discussion of this see Roger Tooze, 'Liberal International Political Economy' in R.J. Barry Jones (ed.), Perspectives on Political Economy (London : Pinter Publishers, Second Edition, forthcoming 1988).
25.
Or as Perry Anderson calls it, the 'exorbitation of language'. See Perry Anderson. in the Tracks of Historical Materialism (London : Verso, 1983).