Giving your organisation SPIRIT: an overview and call to action for directors on issues of corporate governance,corporate reputation and corporate responsibility
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2004
Giving your organisation SPIRIT: an overview and call to action for directors on issues of corporate governance,corporate reputation and corporate responsibility
This paper links Corporate Governance, Corporate Reputation and Corporate Responsibility through an examination of stakeholder relationships. It argues that a focus on relationships will allow directors to manage the issues relating to these complex areas in a practical way. Definitions are as follows: governance is seen to be concerned with the mechanism by which businesses’ relationships are directed and controlled. Reputation is concerned with stakeholder views of a business in key relationships and in terms of key relationship issues. Responsibility is concerned with the way a business conducts its activities and in particular how it relates to its primary and secondary stakeholders. A tool to analyse relationships in these three ways is then presented. The tool is known as a Stakeholder Performance Indicator, Relationship Improvement Tool or SPIRIT, for short.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeliveauB., CottrillM. and O'NeillH. M. (1994), ‘Predicting Corporate Social Responsiveness: A Model Drawn from Three Perspectives’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 13, 9, pp. 731–738.
2.
CadburySir A. (1992), ‘Report on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance’, London: Gee and Company.
3.
ClarkeT. (2004), ‘Accounting for the Fall of Enron: Agency Theory and Stakeholder Interests’, 7th International Conference on Corporate Governance and Board Leadership, Henley Management College, UK, 11–13 October 2004.
4.
CramerJ., Van der HeijdenA., and JanJonker (2004), ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Balancing Between Thinking and Acting’, Paper presented at The Inter-Disciplinary CSR Research Conference at the University of Nottingham 22/23 October 2004.
5.
The Economist (2000), ‘Business Ethics: doing well by doing good: anti globalisation protesters see companies as unethical as well as exploitative. Firms demur, of course, but face an awkward question: does virtue pay?’, The Economist, 22 April 2000, Vol. 3174, pp. 83–86.
6.
The Economist (1995), ‘Hollow Shell: Greenpeace's irrational victory’, The Economist, 24 June 1995, Vol. 335, pp. 43–45.
7.
ElangovanA. R., and ShapiroD. L. (1998), ‘Betrayal of trust in organizations’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, 3, pp. 547–566.
8.
ElkingtonJ. (1998), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
9.
EpsteinM. J., and SchnietzK. E. (2002), ‘Measuring the Cost of Environmental and Labor Protests to Globalization: An Event Study of the Failed 1999 Seattle WTO Talks’, The International Trade Journal, Volume 16, No 2., pp. 129–160.
10.
FombrunC. J. (1996), Reputation, Boston: Harvard University Press.
11.
FombrunC. J. and Van RielC. B. M. (2004), Fame & Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Financial Times, Prentice Hall.
12.
ForemanS., MoneyA. H., and PageM. J. (1998), ‘How Reliable is Reliable? A Note on the Estimation of Cronbach Alpha’, Proceedings of the International Management Conference, May 1998, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 1–26.
13.
FreemanE. (2004), ‘Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Responsibility: Some Practical Questions’, keynote presentation at the 3rd Annual Colloquium of the European Academy of Business in Society.
14.
GarrattR. (foreword by MonksR. A. G., author of Power and Accountability) (2003), Thin on Top: Why Corporate Governance Matters and How to Manage, and Improve Board Performance, Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
15.
HairJ. F., AndersonR. E., TathamR. L. and BlackW. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, the Fifth Edition, London: Prentice Hall.
16.
HambrickD. C., NadlerD. A., and TushmanM. L. (1998) (eds.), Navigating Change: How CEO's, Top Teams and Boards Steer Transformation, Harvard Business School Press.
17.
KleinN. (2001), No Logo, Hammersmith, London: Flamingo.
18.
KramerR. M., and TylerT. R. (1996), Trust in Organisations, London: Sage Publications.
19.
LaffertyB. A., and GoldsmithR. E. (1998), ‘Corporate Credibility’s Role in Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions When a High Versus a Low Credibility Endorser Is Used in the Ad’, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 44 (February), pp. 109–116.
20.
LewellynP. G. (2002), ‘Corporate Reputation: Focusing the Zeitgeist’, Business and Society, Vol. 41 (4), pp. 446–456.
21.
MacMillanA. (2004), ‘Goodwill and the Third Place’, Journal of General Management, Special Issue, Dec 2004.
22.
MacMillanK., and DowningS. J. (1999), ‘Governance and Performance: Goodwill Hunting’, Journal of General Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, Spring.
23.
MacMillanK., MoneyK. G., and DowningS. J. (2000), ‘Successful Business Relationships’, Journal of General Management, Vol. 26, No 1, Autumn.
24.
MahonF. J. and WartickS. L. (2003), ‘Dealing with Stakeholders: How Reputation, Credibility and Framing Influence the Game’, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 6, 1, pp. 19–35.
MoneyK.G. (2000), Relationship Intimacy as a Moderator of Commitment and Trust, Brunel University: Phd Thesis.
27.
MonksR. A. G., and MinowN. (2001), Corporate Governance, 2nd edn., Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
28.
MorganR. M. and HuntS. D. (1994), ‘The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 58, pp. 20–38.
29.
PostJames E., PrestonL. E., and SachsS. (2002), Redfining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth, Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.
30.
PrusakL., and CohenD. (2001), ‘How to invest in social capital’Harvard Business Review, June 2001, pp. 86–94.
31.
RaynerJ. (2003), Managing Reputational Risk: curbing threats, leveraging opportunities, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
32.
RingJ. (2004), ‘Connecting with Communities at Dow Chemical’, Corporate Responsibility Management, Volume 1, Issue 2, October/November.
33.
RutterD., and QuineL. (1994), Social Psychology and Health, Aldershot: Avebury.
34.
SchultzM., HatchM. J., and Holten LarsenM. (2000) (eds.), The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation and the Corporate Brand, New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
StevensP. (2003), ‘CSR – Effective Stakeholder Engagement in Financial Services’, Henley Management College, MBA Thesis.
37.
TuckerS. (2004), ‘Ministers retreat on company reporting’, London: Financial Times, 17 November.
38.
WaddockS. (2003), ‘Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics, and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship’, Boston College Working Paper, pp. 1–34.
39.
WaddockS. (2003), ‘Stakeholder performance implications of corporate responsibility’, International Journal of Performance Management, Vol. 5, 2/3, pp. 114–124.
40.
WaddockS. (2002), Leading Corporate Citizens: visions, values, value added, New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
WheelerD., and SillanpääM. (1997), The Stakeholder Corporation: a blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value, London: Pitman Publishing.
42.
WoodD. (1991), ‘Corporate social Performance revisited’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, 4, pp. 691–718.
43.
ZamanA. (2003), Reputational Risk: How to manage for value creation, Harlow, UK: FT Prentice Hall, Pearson Education.
