The International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), a large international
research programme, served to set the research agenda of a number of environmental
sciences around the issue of global warming and global change. This paper examines
the impact of the interdisciplinary cooperation within the IGBP on ecology and the
ecologists’ response. Ecology was an integral part of the IGBP from the
beginning, yet it was sometimes in uneasy cohabitation with the other sciences
involved. The issues of global warming and global change posed opportunities and
challenges to ecology. They posed opportunities because an important cause emerged,
with promises of exciting new (space) technologies and new funds for the
environmental sciences. They posed challenges, because by aligning itself to
sciences that study the earth system as a whole, ecology was invited implicitly to
bracket its focus on the specificity of local ecosystems, that is, to give up
ecology’s traditional focus on field studies of plant and animal
communities. My aim in this paper is to place the opportunities that global change
research offered to ecology in the context of changes within the field that were
already underway. Power relationships between disciplines did not give ecology an
upper hand vis-à-vis the other earth sciences, but ecologists were able
nevertheless to redefine subtly the notion of the global.
Chapin, F. Stuart
, III,
Osvaldo E. Sala
,
Ingrid C. Burke
,
J. Phillip Grime
et al. (13 coauthors including H. Mooney and W. Steffen) (1998)
‘Ecosystem Consequences of Changing Biodiversity’
, BioScience48:
45–52
.
6.
Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences
(1990) Our Changing Planet: The FY 1991 Research Plan of the
US Global Change Research Program (
Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey
).
7.
Earth System Sciences Committee
(1988) Earth System Science: A Closer View (
Washington, DC: NASA
).
8.
Edelson, Burton I.
(1985)
‘Mission to Planet Earth’
, Science227 (25 January):
367–367
.
9.
Edwards, Paul N.
(2001) ‘Representing the Global Atmosphere:
Computer Models, Data, and Knowledge about Climate Change’,
in
Clark A. Miller
&
Paul N. Edwards
(eds), Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental
Governance (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
): 31–65.
10.
Fujimura, Joan
(1988)
‘The Molecular Bandwagon in Cancer Research: Where Social Worlds Meet’
, Social Problems35:
261–283
.
11.
Fujimura, Joan
(1992) ‘Crafting Science: Standardized Packages,
Boundary Objects and “Translation”’, in
Andrew Pickering
(ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (
Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press
): 168–211.
12.
Gibbons, Michael
,
Camille Limoges
,
Helga Nowotny
,
Simon Schwarzman
,
Peter Scott
&
Martin Trow
(1994) The New Production of Knowledge (
London: SAGE Publications
).
13.
Grimm, Volker
(1999)
‘Ten Years of Individual-Based Modelling in Ecology: What Have We
Learned and What Could We Learn in the Future’
, Ecological Modelling115:
129–148
.
14.
Haas, Peter
(1990) Saving the Mediterranean (
New York: Columbia University Press
).
15.
Hajer, Maarten
(1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse (
Oxford: Oxford University Press
).
16.
Halffman, Willem (2003) Boundaries of Regulatory Science: Eco/toxicology
and Aquatic Hazards of Chemicals in the US, England, and the Netherlands,
1970–1995, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
17.
Heclo, Hugh
(1978) ‘Issue Networks and the Executive
Establishment’, in
Anthony King
(ed.), The New American Political System (
Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute
for Public Policy Research
): 87–124.
18.
International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme
(1986) The International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme: A
Study of Global Change. Final Report of the Ad Hoc Planning Group, IGBP
Global Change Report No. 1 (
Berne: ICSU
).
19.
International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme
(1992) Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems: The
Operational Plan, IGBP Global Change Report No. 21 (
Stockholm: IGBP
).
20.
International Group of Funding Agencies
(1998) Resource Assessment for 1995 (
The Hague: IGFA Secretariat
).
21.
Jasanoff, Sheila
&
M.L. Martello
(eds) (2004) Earthly Politics: Local and Global in
Environmental Governance (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
).
22.
Jasanoff, Sheila
&
Brian Wynne
(1998) ‘Science and
Decisionmaking’, in
S. Rayner
&
E.L. Malone
(eds), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol 1: The Societal
Framework (
Columbus, OH: Battelle Press
): 1–87.
23.
Kennedy, David
(1992) This Far and No Further: The Rise and Fall of the
Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences (
Cambridge, MA: Case Program Kennedy School of
Government, Harvard University
).
24.
Kwa, Chunglin
(1993)
‘Modeling the Grasslands’
, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences24:
125–155
; Addendum in Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences
25 (1994): 184–186.
25.
Lambright, W.H.
(1994)
‘The Political Construction of Space Satellite Technology’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values19:
47–69
.
26.
Latour, Bruno
(1986)
‘Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands’
, Knowledge and Society6:
1–40
.
27.
Mack, Pamela
(1990) Viewing the Earth: The Social Construction of the
Landsat Satellite System (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
).
28.
Mack, Pamela
(1998) ‘LANDSAT and the Rise of Earth Resources
Monitoring’, in
P. Mack
(ed.), From Engineering Science to Big Science: The NACA and NASA
Collier Trophy Research Project Winners (
Washington, DC: NASA
): 235–250.
29.
Meilillo, J.M.
,
A.D. McGuire
,
D.W. Kicklighter
,
B. Moore
, III,
C.J. Vörösmarty
&
A.L. Schloss
(1993)
‘Global Change and Terrestial Net Primary Productivity’
, Nature363:
234–240
.
30.
Mooney, Harold A.
(1996) ‘Ecosystem Physiology: Overview and
Synthesis’, in
B.H. Walker
&
W.L. Steffen
(eds), Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
): 13–19.
31.
Mooney, Harold A.
(1998) The Globalization of Ecological Thought (
Nordbünte, Germany: Ecology Institute
).
32.
Mooney, Harold A.
(2000)
‘On the Road to Global Ecology’
, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment24:
1–31
.
33.
Prentice, I.C.
,
W.P. Cramer
,
S.P. Harrison
,
R. Leemans
,
R.A. Monserud
&
A.M. Solomon
(1993)
‘A Global Biome Model Based on Plant Physiology and Dominance,
Soil Properties and Climate’
, Journal of Biogeography19:
117–134
.
34.
Saugier, Bernard
(1995) Ecophysiologie Végétale.
Rapport CNRS URA Equipe Saugier (
Orsay: Université Paris-Sud
). < www.ese.u-psud.fr/rap_ura/ecol/eco-pubs.htm >.
35.
Shackley, Simon
&
Brian Wynne
(1996)
‘Representing Uncertainty in Global Change Science Policy:
Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values21:
275–302
.
36.
Shackley, Simon
,
P. Young
,
S. Parkinson
&
Brian Wynne
(1998)
‘Uncertainty, Complexity and Concepts of Good Science in Climate
Change Modelling: Are GCMs the Best Tools?’
, Climatic Change38:
157–205
.
37.
Shugart, Herman H.
(1998) Terrestrial Ecosystems in Changing Environments (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
).
38.
Star, Susan Leigh
&
James Griesemer
(1989)
‘“Institutional Ecology”,
“Translations”, and Boundary Objects’
, Social Studies of Science19:
387–420
.
39.
Traweek, Sharon
(1999)
‘Doing Cultural Studies of Science, Technology, and Medicine’
, conference presentation, Society for the Social Studies of
Science, San Diego, CA, October 1999.
40.
Traweek, Sharon
(2000) ‘Faultlines’, in
R. Reid
and
S. Traweek
(eds), Doing Science & Culture (
New York and London: Routledge
): 21–48.
41.
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
(1985) Opportunities for Research at the Atmosphere/Biosphere
Interface. Report of a Workshop on Atmosphere/Biosphere Interactions (
Boulder, CO
), July 22–24.
42.
US National Committee for the IGBP
(1988) Toward an Understanding of Global Change: Initial
Priorities for U.S. Contributions to the International Geosphere-Biosphere
Program (
Washington, DC: National Academy Press
).
43.
Waldrop, M. Mitchell
(1984)
‘An Inquiry into the State of the Earth’
, Science226:
33–35
.
44.
Walker, B.H.
&
W.L. Steffen
(1996) ‘GCTE Science, Objectives, Structure and
Implementation’, in
B.H. Walker
&
W.L. Steffen
(eds), Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
): 3–9.
45.
Weingart, Peter
&
Nico Stehr
(eds) (2000) Practising Interdisciplinarity (
Toronto, Ont.: University of Toronto Press
).
