How does ‘place’ contribute to the credibility of scientific
claims? The Chicago School of urban studies (1918-32) had close ties to the city for
which it was named: its social scientists lived in Chicago, were affiliated with the
University of Chicago, and made Chicago the object of almost all of their empirical
research. In order for this city to become a legitimate source of claims about urban
form and process, Chicago is textually made to oscillate between two available
authorizing spaces. As a field-site, the city of Chicago becomes a found and
uncorrupted reality, the singularly ideal place to do urban research, and requiring
the analyst to get up-close and personal. As a laboratory, Chicago becomes a
controlled environment where artificial specimens yield generalities true anywhere,
requiring of the analyst distance and objectivity. The distinctive epistemic virtues
of both field and laboratory are preserved as complementary sources of credibility,
and Chicago becomes the right place for the job.
Abbott, Andrew
(1999) Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One
Hundred (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
2.
Abbott, Andrew
(2002)
‘Los Angeles and the Chicago School: A Comment on Michael Dear’
, City and Community1:
33-38
.
3.
Anderson, Nels
(1923) The Hobo (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
4.
Aubin, David
(2003)
‘The Fading Star of the Paris Observatory in the Nineteenth
Century: Astronomers’ Urban Culture of Circulation and Observation’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 18:
79-100
.
5.
Beauregard, Robert A.
(2003)
‘City of Superlatives’
, City and Community2:
183-199
.
6.
Biagioli, Mario
(1993) Galileo Courtier (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
7.
Boas, Franz
(1930) ‘Some Problems of Methodology in the
Social Sciences’, in
Leonard D. White
(ed.), The New Social Science (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 84-98.
8.
Bockman, Johanna
&
Gil Eyal
(2002)
‘Eastern Europe as a Laboratory for Economic Knowledge: The
Transnational Roots of Neoliberalism’
, American Journal of Sociology108:
310-352
.
9.
Bonneuil, Christophe
(2004)
‘Beyond Risk: The Construction of GM-Crop Field Tests as a Social
Problem in France’
, Conference paper, 4S/EASST, Paris, August.
10.
Breckinridge, S.P.
&
L.D. White
(1929) ‘Urban Growth and Problems of Social
Control’, in
T.V. Smith
&
Leonard D. White
(eds), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 194-219.
11.
Bulmer, Martin
(1984) The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization,
Diversity and the Rise of Sociological Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
12.
Burgess, Ernest W.
(1925a) ‘The Growth of the City: An Introduction
to a Research Project’, in
Robert E. Park
&
Ernest W. Burgess
(eds), The City (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 47-62.
13.
Burgess, Ernest W.
(1925b) ‘Can Neighborhood Work Have a Scientific
Basis?’, in
Robert E. Park
&
Ernest W. Burgess
(eds), The City (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 142-155.
14.
Burgess, Ernest W.
(1929a) ‘Basic Social Data’,
in
T.V. Smith
&
Leonard D. White
(eds), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 47-66.
15.
Burgess, Ernest W.
(1929b) ‘Urban Areas’, in
T.V. Smith
&
Leonard D. White
(eds), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 113-138.
16.
Burkhardt, Richard W., Jr.
(2000)
‘Ethology, Natural History, the Life Sciences, and the Problem of Place’
, Journal of the History of Biology32:
489-508
.
17.
Callon, Michel
(1987) ‘Society in the Making: The Study of
Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis’, in
Wiebe Bijker
,
Thomas P. Hughes
&
Trevor Pinch
(eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
): 83-103.
18.
Cavan, Ruth Shonle
(1928) Suicide (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
19.
Cenzatti, Marco
(1993) Los Angeles and the L.A. School: Postmodernism and
Urban Studies (
Los Angeles, CA: Forum for Architecture and
Urban Design
).
20.
Cressey, Paul G.
(1932) The Taxi-Dance Hall (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
21.
Cresswell, Tim
(1996) In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology and
Transgression (
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
).
22.
Cronon, William
(1991) Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great
West (
New York: Norton
).
23.
Cunningham, Andrew
&
Perry Williams
(eds) (1992) The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
).
24.
Daston, Lorraine J.
&
Peter Galison
(1992)
‘The Image of Objectivity’
, Representations40:
81-128
.
25.
Davis, Mike
(1990) City of Quartz (
New York: Verso
).
26.
Davis, Mike
(1998) Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of
Disaster (
New York: Random House
).
27.
Davis, Mike
(2002) Dead Cities (
New York: The New Press
).
28.
De Certeau, Michel
(2002) The Practice of Everyday Life (
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
).
29.
Dear, Michael J.
(2000) The Postmodern Urban Condition (
Oxford: Blackwell
).
30.
Dear, Michael
(2002a)
‘Los Angeles and the Chicago School: Invitation to a Debate’
, City and Community1:
5-32
.
31.
Dear, Michael
(ed.) (2002b) From Chicago to L.A.: Making Sense of Urban
Theory (
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
).
32.
Deegan, Mary Jo
(1986) Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School,
1892-1918 (
New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
).
33.
Derksen, Maarten
(2000)
‘Clinical Psychology and the Psychological Clinic’
, History and Philosophy of Psychology2:
1-17
.
34.
Dibble, Vernon J.
(1975) The Legacy of Albion Small (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
35.
Dierig, Sven
,
Jens Lachmund
&
Andrew Mendelsohn
(2003)
‘Introduction: Toward an Urban History of Science’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 18:
1-20
.
36.
Drayton, Richard
(2000) Nature’s Government: Science, Imperial
Britain and the ‘Improvement’ of the World (
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
).
37.
Ethington, Philip J.
&
Martin Meeker
(2002) ‘Saber y Conocer: The Metropolis of Urban
Inquiry’, in
Michael Dear
(ed.), From Chicago to L.A.: Making Sense of Urban Theory (
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
): 405-420.
38.
Fan, Fa-Ti
(2003)
‘Science in a Chinese Entrepôt: British Naturalists and
their Chinese Associates in Old Canton’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 18:
60-78
.
39.
Faris, Robert E.L.
(1967) Chicago Sociology 1920-1932 (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
40.
Findlen, Paula
(1994) Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific
Culture in Early Modern Italy (
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
).
41.
Fine, Gary Alan
(1995) A Second Chicago School? The Development of a Postwar
American Sociology (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
42.
Forgan, Sophie
&
Graeme Gooday
(1996)
‘Constructing South Kensington: The Buildings and Politics of
T.H. Huxley’s Working Environments’
, British Journal for the History of Science29:
435-468
.
43.
Frazier, E. Franklin
(1932) The Negro Family in America (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
44.
Galison, Peter
(1997) Image and Logic (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
45.
Galison, Peter
&
Emily Thompson
(eds) (1999) The Architecture of Science (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
).
46.
Garber, J.
(1999)
‘Reporting from the Scene of the Accident: Mike Davis and the
American City’
, Studies in Political Economy60:
90-120
.
47.
Gaziano, Emanuel
(1996)
‘Ecological Metaphors as Boundary Work’
, American Journal of Sociology101:
874-907
.
48.
Geison, Gerald L.
(1981)
‘Scientific Change, Emerging Specialties, and Research Schools’
, History of Science19:
20-40
.
49.
Gieryn, Thomas F.
(1999) ‘Two Faces on Science: Building
Identities for Molecular Biology and Biotechnology’, in
Peter Galison
&
Emily Thompson
(eds), The Architecture of Science (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
): 423-455.
50.
Gieryn, Thomas F.
(2002a)
‘Three Truth-Spots’
, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences38:
113-132
.
51.
Gieryn, Thomas F.
(2002b)
‘What Buildings Do’
, Theory and Society31:
35-74
.
52.
Gieryn, Thomas F.
(2005) ‘Instrumentalities of Place in Science
and Art’, in
Helmar Schramm
,
Ludger Schwarte
&
Jan Lazardzig
(eds), Instrumente in Kunst und Wissenschaft: Zur Architektonik
kultureller Grenzen im 17. Jahrhundert (
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
) (In the Press).
53.
Gilbert, G. Nigel
&
Michael Mulkay
(1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological
Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
).
54.
Goffman, Erving
(1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (
New York: Doubleday
).
55.
Golinski, Jan
(1998) Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the
History of Science (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
).
56.
Goodwin, Charles
(1995)
‘Seeing in Depth’
, Social Studies of Science25:
237-274
.
57.
Gosnell, Harold F.
(1927) Getting Out the Vote: An Experiment in the
Stimulations of Voting (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
58.
Gosnell, Harold F.
(1929) ‘The Technique of
Measurement’, in
T.V. Smith
&
Leonard D. White
(eds), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 90-112.
59.
Gottdeiner, M.
(2002) ‘Urban Analysis as Merchandizing: The
“LA School” and the Understanding of Metropolitan
Development’, in
J. Eade
&
C. Mele
(eds), Understanding the City (
Oxford: Blackwell
): 159-180.
60.
Gross, Matthias
(2003) Inventing Nature: Ecological Restoration by Public
Experiments (
Lanham, MD: Lexington Books
).
Gusterson, Hugh
(1998) Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the
Cold War (
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
).
63.
Hallett, Tim
&
Gary Alan Fine
(2000)
‘Ethnography 1900: Learning from the Field Research of an Old Century’
, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography29:
593-617
.
64.
Hannaway, Owen
(1986)
‘Laboratory Design and the Aim of Science’
, Isis77:
585-610
.
65.
Hanson, Elizabeth
(2002) Animal Attractions: Nature on Display in American
Zoos (
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
).
66.
Heilbron, J.L.
(1999) The Sun in the Church: Cathedrals as Solar
Observatories (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
).
67.
Helford, Reid
(1999)
‘Rediscovering the Presettlement Landscape: Making the Oak
Savanna “Real”’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values24:
55-79
.
68.
Henke, Christopher R.
(2000)
‘Making a Place for Science: The Field Trial’
, Social Studies of Science30:
483-511
.
69.
Hevly, Bruce
(1996)
‘The Heroic Science of Glacier Motion’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 11:
66-86
.
70.
Hunt, Darnell M.
(2002) ‘Representing “Los
Angeles”: Media, Space, and Place’, in
Michael Dear
(ed.), From Chicago to L.A.: Making Sense of Urban Theory (
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
): 321-342.
71.
Hunter, Albert
(1980)
‘Why Chicago? The Rise of the Chicago School of Urban Social Science’
, American Behavioral Scientist24:
215-227
.
72.
Jardine, Nicholas
(2000) The Scenes of Inquiry (
Oxford: Oxford University Press
).
73.
Jeter, Helen R.
(1929) ‘Analyzing the Growth of the
City’, in
T.V. Smith
&
Leonard D. White
(eds), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 67-77.
74.
Josephson, Paul R.
(1997) New Atlantis Revisited: Akademgorodok, the Siberian
City of Science (
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
).
75.
Joyce, Nancy E.
(2004) Building Stata: The Design and Construction of Frank
O. Gehry’s Stata Center at MIT (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
).
76.
Knorr Cetina, Karin
(1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make
Knowledge (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
).
77.
Knowles, Scott G.
&
Stuart W. Leslie
(2001)
‘“Industrial Versailles”: Eero
Saarinen’s Corporate Campuses for GM, IBM and AT&T’
, Isis92:
1-33
.
78.
Kohler, Robert E.
(2002a)
‘Place and Practice in Field Biology’
, History of Science40:
189-210
.
79.
Kohler, Robert E.
(2002b)
‘Labscapes: Naturalizing the Laboratory’
, History of Science40:
473-501
.
80.
Kohler, Robert E.
(2002c) Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field
Border in Biology (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
81.
Krohn, Wolfgang
&
Johannes Weyer
(1994)
‘Society as a Laboratory: The Social Risks of Experimental Research’
, Science and Public Policy21:
173-183
.
82.
Kuklick, Henrika
(1980)
‘Chicago Sociology and Urban Planning Policy: Sociological Theory
as Occupational Ideology’
, Theory and Society9:
821-845
.
83.
Kurtz, Lester R.
(1984) Evaluating Chicago Sociology (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
84.
Lachmund, Jens
(2003)
‘Exploring the City of Rubble: Botanical Fieldwork in Bombed
Sites in Germany after World War II’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 18:
234-254
.
85.
Lachmund, Jens
(2004) ‘Knowing the Urban Wasteland: Ecological
Expertise as Local Process’, in
Sheila Jasanoff
&
Marybeth Long Martello
(eds), Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental
Governance (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
): 241-261.
86.
Lafuente, Antonio
&
Tiago Saraiva
(2004)
‘The Urban Scale of Science and the Enlargement of Madrid (1851-1936)’
, Social Studies of Science34:
531-569
.
87.
Latour, Bruno
(1983) ‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise
the World’, in
Karin D. Knorr-Cetina
&
Michael Mulkay
(eds), Science Observed (
London: SAGE Publications
): 141-170.
88.
Latour, Bruno
(1996) Aramis or The Love of Technology (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
).
89.
Latour, Bruno
(1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of
Science Studies (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
).
90.
Law, John
(1987) ‘Technology and Heterogeneous
Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion’, in
Wiebe Bijker
,
Thomas P. Hughes
&
Trevor Pinch
(eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
): 111-134.
91.
Lindner, Rolf
(1996) The Reportage of Urban Culture: Robert Park and the
Chicago School (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
).
92.
Livingstone, David
(2003) Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of
Scientific Knowledge (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
93.
Lynch, Michael
(1988)
‘The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the
Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences’
, Human Studies11:
201-234
.
94.
MacDonald, Sharon
(ed.) (1998) The Politics of Display: Museums, Science,
Culture (
London: Routledge
).
95.
McCook, Stuart
(1996)
‘“It May Be Truth, But It Is Not Evidence”:
Paul du Chaillu and the Legitimation of Evidence in the Field Sciences’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 11:
177-197
.
96.
MacKenzie, Donald
(1990) Inventing Accuracy (
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
).
97.
McKenzie, R.D.
(1925) ‘The Ecological Approach to the Study of
the Human Community’, in
Robert E. Park
&
Ernest W. Burgess
(eds), The City (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 63-79.
98.
Markus, Thomas A.
(1993) Buildings and Power (
London: Routledge
).
99.
Masco, Joseph
(1999) ‘States of Insecurity: Plutonium and
Post-Cold War Anxiety in New Mexico, 1992-96’, in
Jutta Weldes
(ed.), Cultures of Insecurity (
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
): 203-231.
100.
Mendelsohn, J. Andrew
(2003)
‘The Microscopist of Modern Life’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 18:
150-170
.
Mitman, Gregg
(1996)
‘When Nature Is the Zoo: Vision and Power in the Art and Science
of Natural History’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 11:
117-143
.
103.
Molotch, Harvey
(2002)
‘School’s Out: A Response to Michael Dear’
, City and Community1:
39-43
.
104.
Monahan, Torin
(2002)
‘Los Angelas Studies: The Emergence of a Speciality Field’
, City and Society14:
155-184
.
105.
Mowrer, Ernest R.
(1927) Family Disorganization (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
106.
Mukerji, Chandra
(1997) Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of
Versailles (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
).
107.
Murray, Narisara (2004) Lives of the Zoo: Charismatic Animals in the
Social Worlds of the Zoological Gardens of London, 1850-1897, PhD
dissertation, Indiana University.
108.
Ophir, Adi
&
Steven Shapin
(1991)
‘The Place of Knowledge: A Methodological Survey’
, Science in Context4:
3-21
.
109.
Outram, Dorinda
(1996) ‘New Spaces in Natural
History’, in
N. Jardine
,
J.A. Secord
&
E.C. Spary
(eds), Cultures of Natural History (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
): 249-265.
110.
Palmer, Vivien M.
(1928) Field Studies in Sociology: A Student’s
Manual (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
111.
Park, Robert E.
(1925) ‘The City: Suggestions for the
Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment’, in
Robert E. Park
&
Ernest W. Burgess
(eds), The City (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 1-46.
112.
Park, Robert E.
(1929) ‘The City as Social
Laboratory’, in
T.V. Smith
&
Leonard D. White
(eds), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 1-19.
113.
Park, Robert E.
&
Ernest W. Burgess
(1921) Introduction to the Science of Sociology (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
114.
Park, Robert E.
&
Ernest W. Burgess
(eds) (1925) The City (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
115.
Persons, Stow
(1987) Ethnic Studies at Chicago 1905-45 (
Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
).
116.
Picon, Antoine
(2003)
‘Nineteenth-Century Cartography and the Urban Ideal in Paris’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 18:
135-149
.
117.
Plummer, Ken
(ed.) (1997) The Chicago School: Critical Assessments,
4 vols (
London: Routledge
).
118.
Pols, Hans
(2003)
‘Anomie in the Metropolis: The City in American Sociology and Psychiatry’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 18:
194-211
.
119.
Raushenbush, Winifred
(1979) Robert E. Park: Biography of a Sociologist (
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
).
120.
Reckless, Walter C.
(1933) Vice in Chicago (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
121.
Rees, Amanda
(2001)
‘Practising Infanticide, Observing Narrative: Controversial Texts
in a Field Science’
, Social Studies of Science31:
507-531
.
122.
Rice, Stuart A.
(1931) ‘Hypotheses and Verifications in Clifford
R. Shaw’s Studies of Juvenile Delinquency’, in
Stuart A. Rice
(ed.), Method in Social Science: A Case Book (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 549-565.
123.
Richmond, Marsha L.
(1997)
‘“A Lab of One’s Own”: The Balfour
Biological Laboratory for Women at Cambridge University, 1884-1914’
, Isis88:
422-455
.
124.
Roth, Wolff-Michael
&
G. Michael Bowen
(2001)
‘“Creative Solutions” and Fibbing Results:
Enculturation in Field Ecology’
, Social Studies of Science31:
533-556
.
125.
Rothfels, Nigel
(2002) Savages and Beasts: The Birth of the Modern Zoo (
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
).
126.
Rudwick, Martin J.S.
(1976)
‘The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science, 1760-1840’
, History of Science14:
149-195
.
127.
Ruml, Beardsley
(1930) ‘Recent Trends in Social
Science’, in
Leonard D. White
(ed.), The New Social Science (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 90-111.
128.
Salerno, Roger A.
(1987) Louis Wirth: A Bio-Bibliography (
New York: Greenwood Press
).
129.
Sampson, Robert J.
(2002)
‘Studying Modern Chicago’
, City and Community1:
45-48
.
130.
Sampson, Robert J.
,
Jeffrey D. Morenoff
&
Thomas Gannon-Rowley
(2002)
‘Assessing Neighborhood Effects: Social Processes and New
Directions in Research’
, Annual Review of Sociology28:
443-479
.
131.
Scott, Allen J.
(1996) ‘High-Technology Industrial Development
in the San Fernando Valley and Ventura County: Observations on Economic Growth
and the Evolution of Urban Form’, in
Allen J. Scott
&
Edward W. Soja
(eds), The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the
Twentieth Century (
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
): 276-310.
132.
Scott, Allen J.
&
Edward W. Soja
(eds) (1996) The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the
End of the Twentieth Century (
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
).
133.
Secord, Anne
(1994)
‘Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth
Century Lancashire’
, History of Science25:
269-315
.
134.
Servos, John
(1993)
‘Research Schools and their History’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 8:
2-15
.
135.
Shackelford, Joel
(1993)
‘Tycho Brahe, Laboratory Design and the Aim of Science’
, Isis84:
211-230
.
136.
Shapin, Steven
(1988)
‘The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England’
, Isis79:
373-404
.
137.
Shapin, Steven
(1994) A Social History of Truth (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
138.
Shapin, Steven
(1995)
‘Cordelia’s Love: Credibility and the Social Studies of Science’
, Perspectives on Science3:
255-275
.
139.
Shapin, Steven
(1998)
‘Placing the View from Nowhere: Historical and Sociological
Problems in the Location of Science’
, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, n.s.,
23:
5-12
.
140.
Shaw, Clifford R.
(1929) Delinquency Areas (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
141.
Shaw, Clifford R.
(1930) The Jack-Roller: A Delinquent Boy’s Own
Story (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
142.
Shaw, Clifford R.
(1931) The Natural History of a Delinquent Career (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
143.
Shore, Marlene
(1987) The Science of Social Redemption: McGill, the Chicago
School, and the Origins of Social Research in Canada (
Toronto: University of Toronto Press
).
144.
Shoshkes, Ellen
(1989) The Design Process (
New York: Watson-Guptill
).
145.
Silbey, Susan S.
&
Patricia Ewick
(2003) ‘The Architecture of Authority: The Place
of Law in the Space of Science’, in
Austin Sarat
,
Lawrence Douglas
&
Martha Umphrey
(eds), The Place of Law (
Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
): 75-108.
146.
Simmel, Georg
(1971 [1903]) ‘The Metropolis and Mental
Life’, in G. Simmel, On Individuality and Social Forms (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 324-339.
147.
Simmel, Georg
(1971 [1908]) ‘The Stranger’,
in G. Simmel, On Individuality and Social Forms (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 143-149.
148.
Smith, Crosbie
&
Jon Agar
(eds) (1998) Making Space for Science: Territorial Themes in
the Shaping of Knowledge (
London: Macmillan
).
149.
Smith, T.V.
(1929) ‘Social Science Research and the
Community’, in
T.V. Smith
&
Leonard D. White
(eds), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 220-247.
150.
Smith, T.V.
&
Leonard D. White
(eds) (1929) Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science
Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
151.
Soja, Edward W.
(1989) Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in
Critical Social Theory (
New York: Verso
).
152.
Soja, Edward W.
(1996a) ‘Los Angeles, 1965-1992: From
Crisis-Generated Restructuring to Restructuring-Generated
Crisis’, in
Allen J. Scott
&
Edward W. Soja
(eds), The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the
Twentieth Century (
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
): 426-462.
153.
Soja, Edward W.
(1996b) Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other
Real-and-Imagined Places (
Oxford: Blackwell
).
154.
Soja, Edward W.
(2002) Postmetropolis (
Oxford: Blackwell
).
155.
Sorrenson, Richard
(1996)
‘The Ship as a Scientific Instrument in the Eighteenth Century’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 11:
221-236
.
156.
Thrasher, Frederic M.
(1927) The Gang (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
157.
Tobey, Ronald C.
(1981) Saving the Prairies: The Life Cycle of the Founding
School of American Plant Ecology, 1895-1955 (
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
).
158.
Todes, Daniel P.
(2002) Pavlov’s Physiology Factory: Experiment,
Interpretation, Laboratory Enterprise (
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
).
159.
Tönnies, Ferdinand
(1963 [1887]) Community and Society (
New York: Harper & Row
).
160.
Traweek, Sharon
(1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy
Physicists (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
).
161.
Wakeman, Rosemary
(2003)
‘Dreaming the New Atlantis: Science and the Planning of
Technopolis, 1955-1985’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 18:
255-270
.
162.
Walton, John
(1993)
‘Urban Sociology: The Contribution and Limits of Political Ecology’
, Annual Review of Sociology19:
301-321
.
163.
Waterton, Claire
(2002)
‘From Field to Fantasy: Classifying Nature, Constructing Europe’
, Social Studies of Science32:
177-204
.
164.
Weiner, Dora
&
Michael Sauter
(2003)
‘The City of Paris and the Rise of Clinical Medicine’
, Osiris, 2nd ser., 18:
23-42
.
165.
Weinstein, Richard S.
(1996) ‘The First American
City’, in
Allen J. Scott
&
Edward W. Soja
(eds), The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the
Twentieth Century (
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
): 22-46.
166.
Weisz, George
(2001)
‘Spas, Mineral Waters, and Hydrological Science in
Twentieth-Century France’
, Isis92:
451-483
.
167.
White, Leonard D.
(1929a) ‘The Local Community Research Committee
and the Social Science Research Building’, in
T.V. Smith
&
Leonard D. White
(eds), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 20-32.
168.
White, Leonard D.
(1929b) ‘Co-operation with Civic and Social
Agencies’, in
T.V. Smith
&
Leonard D. White
(eds), Chicago: An Experiment in Social Science Research (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 33-46.
169.
Wirth, Louis
(1925) ‘A Bibliography of the Urban
Community’, in
Robert E. Park
&
Ernest W. Burgess
(eds), The City (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 161-228.
170.
Wirth, Louis
(1928) The Ghetto (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
171.
Young, Kimball
(1931) ‘Frederic M. Thrasher’s Study
of Gangs’, in
Stuart A. Rice
(ed.), Method in Social Science: A Case Book (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
): 511-527.
172.
Young, Pauline V.
(1932) The Pilgrims of Russian-Town (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
173.
Zorbaugh, Harvey W.
(1929) The Gold Coast and the Slum (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
).
