Student competitions can play an important role in education: they promote interest and engagement of the students, as well as of the teachers. In the case of engineering, one of the most challenging contests in Europe is the Motostudent event, joined by the University of Brescia (UniBS) in 2016 for the first time. It is a typical implementation of Kolb’s theory of experiential learning, where engineering theory and application meet in an intensive, ‘hands-on’ team work experience, resulting in a very effective learning process that involves the so-called soft skills as well. The paper aims at briefly reviewing the scope of competitions like the Formula SAE and sharing the authors’ experience in a similar event, the Motostudent contest.
SiddiqueZHardréPLBradshawACet al. Fostering innovation through experiential learning. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2010, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 15–18 August 2010, Paper No. DETC2010-28892, pp. 791–803.
2.
PascalJPascalTL. Using student developed comics to promote learning of transport phenomena concepts. In: 2017 ASEE annual conference and exposition, Columbus, Oahio (USA), 25–28 June 2017, pp. 321–334.
3.
AzmanFNZaibonSBShiratuddinN.A study on user’s perception towards learner-generated comics.Int Rev Manage Marketing2016;
6: 37–42.
4.
MetragliaRVillaV.Engineering graphics education: webcomics as a tool to improve weaker students’ motivation. RJASET2014;
7: 4106–4114.
KappK.The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. USA: Pfeiffer, 2012.
7.
HuangWH-YSomanD.A practitioner’s guide to gamification of education. Research report series behavioural economics in action. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto (USA), 2013.
8.
BorysMLaskowskiM. Implementing game elements into didactic process: a case study. In: Management, knowledge and learning international conference, Zadar, Croatia, 19-21 June 2013, pp. 819–824.
9.
PavlusJ.The game of life. Sci Am2010;
303: 43–44.
10.
Gómez-JáureguiVManchadoCOteroC. Gamification in a graphical engineering course – learning by playing. Lect Notes Mech Eng2017; 2017: 915–922.
11.
HamzehFTheokarisCRouhanaCet al.
Application of hands-on simulation games to improve classroom experience. Eur J Eng Educ2017;
42: 471–481.
12.
MahmudZWeberPJMoeningJP. Gamification of engineering courses. In: ASEE Annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings, Columbus, Oahio (USA), 25–28 June 2017.
13.
Sánchez-CarmonaARoblesSPonsJ.A gamification experience to improve engineering students’ performance through motivation. J Technol Sci Educ2017;
7: 150–161.
14.
Baalsrud HaugeJMStǍnescuIACarvalhoMBet al. Integrating gamification in mechanical engineering systems to support knowledge processes. In: Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, 1B-2015, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, August 2–5, 2015, pp. V01BT02A015; 8 pages.
15.
KimERothrockLFreivaldsA. The effects of gamification on engineering lab activities. In: Proceedings – frontiers in education conference, FIE, 1-6 November 2016, Eire, PA (USA), pp. 1–6.
16.
LambruschiniBBPizarroWG. Tech-gamification in university engineering education: captivating students, generating knowledge. In: Tenth international conference on computer science and education ICCSE 2015, Cambridge, UK, 22-24 July 2015, pp. 295–299.
17.
MarascoEABehjatLRosehartW. Integration of gamification and creativity in engineering design. In: ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings (122nd ASEE annual conference and exposition: making value for society), Seattle, Washington, USA, 14–17 June 2015, pp. 698–709.
18.
MarkopoulosAPFragkouAKasidiarisPDet al.
Gamification in engineering education and professional training. Int J Mech Eng Educ2015;
43: 118–131.
19.
MinovićMGarcía-PeñalvoFJKearneyN.Gamification ecosystems in engineering education. Int J Eng Educ2016;
32: 308–309.
20.
WankatPCOreoviczFS.Teaching engineering. 2nd ed. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, Indiana (USA), 2015.
21.
BanduraA.Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall, 1986.
22.
BanduraA.Self-efficacy: the exercise of control.
New York:
W.H. Freeman, 1997.
23.
MillerGA.The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev1956;
63: 81–97.
24.
KolbD.Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall, 1984.
25.
KolbAYKolbDA.Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manage Learn Educ2005;
4: 193–212.
26.
BloomBSEngelhartMDFurstEJet al.Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook I: cognitive domain.
New York:
David McKay Company, 1956.
27.
AndersonLWet al. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, USA, 2001.
28.
WickendenPWStobartRK. An evaluation of Formula SAE in the context of the UK engineering education: culture, money and space. In: SAE World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, USA. SAE paper 2007-01-1051, 2007.
BrawnRParrA.Total competition: lessons in strategy from formula one. UK: Simon & Schuster, 2016.
33.
De JuanAet al.
Enhancement of mechanical engineering degree through student design competition as added value. Considerations and viability. J Eng Des2016;
27: 568–589.
34.
BuchalRO.The educational value of student design competitions, The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, 2011.
35.
PradaJGDSabandoALAntònRet al.
An analysis of soft skills development of a Formula-Student (SAE) team. Int J Eng Educ2015;
31: 209–219.
36.
MikesellDRSawyersDRMarquartJE. External engineering competitions as undergraduate educational experiences. In: Proceedings of the ASEE – American Society for Engineering Education annual conference (session 2012-3153), 22–24 June 2012, Washington, DC: ASEE.
37.
GolemanD.Emotional intelligence: why it can matter more than IQ. NewYork, NY, USA: Bantam Books, 1995.
38.
CremaCDepariAFlamminiAet al. Smartphone-based system for vital parameters and stress conditions monitoring for non-professional racecar drivers. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE SENSORS. 7370521, 1–4 November 2015, DOI: 10.1109/ICSENS.2015.7370521
39.
MarchesinFPBarbosaRSAlvesMALet al. Upright mounted pushrod: the effects on racecar handling dynamics. The dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks. In: Proceedings of the 24th symposium of the international association for vehicle system dynamics, IAVSD 2015, Graz, Austria, pp.543–552, DOI: 10.1201/b21185-59
40.
BeniniCGadolaMChindamoDet al.
The influence of suspension components friction on race car vertical dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn2017;
55: 338–350.
41.
ChindamoDGadolaMMarchesinFP.Reproduction of real-world road profiles on a four-poster rig for indoor vehicle chassis and suspension durability testing. Adv Mech Eng2017;
9: 1–10.
42.
ChindamoDEconomouJTGadolaMet al.
A neurofuzzy-controlled power management strategy for a series hybrid electric vehicle. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2014;
228: 1034–1050.
43.
Dal BiancoNLotRGadolaM. Minimum time optimal control simulation of a GP2 race car. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering, First Published Online 9 October 2017, DOI: 10.1177/0954407017728158
44.
GadolaMChindamoDLegnaniGet al. Teaching automotive suspension design to engineering students: bridging the gap between CAD and CAE tools through an integrated approach. Paper under review, 2017.
45.
SharpRS.Chatter vibrations of high-performance motorcycles. Veh Syst Dyn2013;
51: 393–404.
46.
CossalterV.Motorcycle dynamics. 2nd ed., 2006.
47.
MuffoliniD.Reverse engineering e successiva progettazione di un telaio motociclistico in lega leggera a caratteresportivo. MSc Thesis, University of Brescia, Italy, 2011.
